Background: Spinal computer-assisted navigation (CAN) is proven to increase instrumentation accuracy. Adoption remains limited by workflow restrictions, learning curves and costs. Here, we assess spinal CAN usage among Ontario surgeons to identify gaps in application, and temporal trends of usage. Methods: A prospectively-collected database of provincial insurance billables and diagnostic codes was reviewed retrospectively, from 2002-2014. Patients undergoing instrumented spinal fusions or percutaneous vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty were identified. Fee and diagnostic codes were applied to distinguish surgical indication and approach. The use of intra-operative navigation was determined for each case. Results: We identified 4607 instrumented spinal fusions in our cohort. Most cases were performed by orthopedic surgeons (63.2%) and the remainder by neurosurgeons. Of 2239 cases with identifiable etiology, CAN was utilized in 8.8%, predominantly for trauma and degenerative pathologies rather than deformity. In univariate analyses, CAN was used more often by neurosurgeons (21.0% vs. 12.4%, p<0.001), in academic institutions (15.9% vs. 12.3%, p<0.001), and when performed in/after 2010 (18.9% vs. 8.9%, p<0.001). Differences by specialty and year remained significant in multiple logistic regression. Conclusions: Spinal CAN has proven benefit for instrumentation accuracy, but is used preferentially by academic neurosurgeons. Significant gains must be made in cost and usability to improve access across disciplines and institutions.