Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T12:57:06.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P.062 Does the intensity of brain parenchymal contrast staining on post-recanalization dual energy head CT (DECT) of stroke patients predict the fate of brain tissue?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2022

B Alomran
Affiliation:
(Vancovour)*
D Byrne
Affiliation:
(Vancovour)
J Walsh
Affiliation:
(Vancovour)
N Murray
Affiliation:
(Vancovour)
F Settecase
Affiliation:
(Vancovour)
B Rohr
Affiliation:
(Vancovour)
A Rohr
Affiliation:
(vancovour)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: On DECT, the ratio of maximum iodine concentration within parenchyma compared to the superior sagittal sinus has been shown to predict hemorrhagic transformation. We aimed to determine if this ratio also predicts the development of an infarct. Methods: 53 patients with small infarct cores (ASPECTS≥7) and good endovascular recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) were enrolled. Maximum brain parenchymal iodine concentration as per DECT relative to the superior sagittal sinus (iodine ratio) was correlated with the development of an infarct on follow up CT. Results: All patients showed contrast staining, 52 developed infarcts in the area of staining. The extent of infarction (smaller, equal or larger than area of staining) did not correlate with the iodine ratio. Conclusions: Brain parenchyma with contrast staining on post-procedure head CT almost invariably goes on to infarct, however the extent of infarct development is not predicted by the intensity of contrast staining.

n=53 patients with successful recanalization of anterior circulation LVO infarct (TICI2b,3) with post procedural parenchymal iodine staining

F/U infarct extentNumberHemorrhage(n)Iodine ratio on intial CT(median/range)
0: No infarct in area of staining10101(101-101)*
1: Infarct smaller than staining80138(64-341)*
2: Infarct equal to staining140140(74-259)*
3:Infarct larger than staining306120(23-1715)*
0,1:No or smaller infarct than staining90114(64-341)*
2,3 :equal or larger infarct than staining446126(23-1714)*
all536123(23-1714)*

There was no correlation between the degree of contrast staining on initial post procedural CT as expressed in iodine ratio and F/U infarct extent.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation