Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T12:13:12.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Human Resources Survey of Clinical Neurophysiologists in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

K. Ming Chan ,
G. Bryan Young  and
Sharon Warren
K. Ming Chan*
Affiliation:
Division of Physical Medical & Rehabilitation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
G. Bryan Young
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Sharon Warren
Affiliation:
Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
*
513 Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Although electromyography (EMG), electroencephalography (EEG) and evoked potential (EP) studies are common investigation tools for patients with neurologic illnesses, no formal data on the manpower supply in Canada exists. Because of the importance of these on training requirements and future planning, the purpose of this study was to establish a comprehensive profile of the human resources situation in clinical neurophysiological services across Canada.

Methods:

A questionnaire was sent to all clinical neurophysiologists in Canada. To capture the maximal number of respondents, a total of three rounds of mail out were done. In addition, to obtain accurate demographic data on supporting technologists, a separate survey was also carried out by the Association of Electrophysiological Technologists of Canada.

Results:

Of the 450 clinical neurophysiologists identified and surveyed, the provincial response rate was 59±14% (mean±SD). Of these, the vast majority practiced in urban centres. There was substantial regional disparity in different provinces. While the wait time for most EEG and EP laboratories was less than six weeks, the wait time for EMG was substantially longer. With the age of the largest number of practitioners in their sixth decade, projected retirement over the next 15 years was 58%. The demographic distribution of the supporting technologists showed a similar trend.

Conclusions:

In addition to considerable regional disparity and urban/rural divide, a large percentage of clinical neurophysiologists and supporting technologists planned to retire within the coming decade. To ensure secure and high standard services to Canadians, solutions to fill this void are urgently needed.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 321 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2009

References

1. Bailey, P, Warren, S, Buske, L. Highlights of the 2002 Canadian Neurological Society (CNS) manpower survey. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005; 32(4): 425–32.Google Scholar
2. Keene, DL, Humphreys, P. Inventory of pediatric neurology “manpower” in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005; 32(3): 306–10.Google Scholar
3. Bellan, L, Buske, L. Ophthalmology human resource projections: are we heading for a crisis in the next 15 years? Can J Ophthalmol. 2007; 42(1): 34–38.Google Scholar
4.Statistics Canada. Structure and change in Canada’s rural femography: an update to 2006 with provincial detail. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/21-601-m/21-601m2008090-eng.pdf Google Scholar