Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:50:03.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intracranial Telemetry Recording of Intractable Epilepsy at London Health Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

David A. Steven
Affiliation:
Epilepsy Program, Western University, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
Richard S. McLachlan*
Affiliation:
Epilepsy Program, Western University, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
*
Epilepsy Programme, Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, LHSC - University Hospital, 339 Windermere Rd London, Ontario, N6A5A5, Canada. Email: rick.mclachlan@lhsc.on.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Routine EEG telemetry using scalp electrode recordings is carried out in all patients being considered for epilepsy surgery. However this, along with other testing, may not yield sufficient information about the location of seizure onset to allow a decision regarding surgery to be made. Various methods have been developed to implant electrodes for chronic recording closer to the cortical surface from which seizures arise including the use of sphenoidal, foramen ovale, epidural peg, subdural and depth electrodes. This is a review of the last two techniques particularly as utilized at London Health Sciences Centre.

Résumé

RÉSUMÉ

L'enregistrement ÉEG par télémétrie au moyen d'électrodes appliquées sur le cuir chevelu est fait de routine chez tous les patients évalués en vue d'une chirurgie de l'épilepsie. Cependant cet enregistrement, ainsi que les autres tests effectués, ne fournissent pas toujours suffisamment d'information sur le site où les crises prennent naissance pour permettre de prendre une décision concernant la chirurgie à effectuer. Différentes méthodes ont été développées pour implanter des électrodes afin de procéder à un enregistrement prolongé plus près de la surface corticale au site où les crises prennent naissance dont l'utilisation d'électrodes sphénoïdales, d'électrodes du trou ovale, d'électrodes épidurales PEG, d'électrodes sous-durales et d'électrodes profondes. Nous revoyons l'utilisation de ces deux dernières techniques au London Health Sciences Centre.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2012

References

1. Sperling, MR, Shewmon, DA. General Principles for Presurgical Evaluation. In: Engel, JJ, Pedley, TA, eds. Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:1697705.Google Scholar
2. Bancaud, J, Angelergues, R, Bernouilli, C, et al. [Functional stereotaxic exploration (stereo-electroencephalography) in epilepsies]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1969;120:448.Google Scholar
3. Bancaud, J, Angelergues, R, Bernouilli, C, et al. Functional stereotaxic exploration (SEEG) of epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970;28:856.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Olivier, A, Gloor, P, Quesney, LF, Andermann, F. The indications for and the role of depth electrode recording in epilepsy. Appl Neurophysiol. 1983;46:336.Google Scholar
5. Spencer, SS. Depth electroencephalography in selection of refractory epilepsy for surgery. Ann Neurol. 1981;9:20714.Google Scholar
6. Adelson, PD, Black, PM, Madsen, JR, et al. Use of subdural grids and strip electrodes to identify a seizure focus in children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22:17480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Cohen-Gadol, AA, Spencer, DD. Use of an anteromedial subdural strip electrode in the evaluation of medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:9213.Google Scholar
8. Steven, DA, Andrade-Souza, YM, Burneo, JG, McLachlan, RS, Parrent, AG. Insertion of subdural strip electrodes for the investigation of temporal lobe epilepsy. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2007;106:11026.Google Scholar
9. Wyler, AR, Ojemann, GA, Lettich, E, Ward, AA Jr., Subdural strip electrodes for localizing epileptogenic foci. J Neurosurg. 1984;60:1195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Spencer, SS, Spencer, DD, Williamson, PD, Mattson, R. Combined depth and subdural electrode investigation in uncontrolled epilepsy. Neurology. 1990;40:749.Google Scholar
11. Behrens, E, Zentner, J, van Roost, D, Hufnagel, A, Elger, CE, Schramm, J. Subdural and depth electrodes in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;128:847.Google Scholar
12. van Veelen, CW, Debets, RM, van Huffelen, AC, et al. Combined use of subdural and intracerebral electrodes in preoperative evaluation of epilepsy. Neurosurgery. 1990;26:93101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Spencer, SS, Spencer, DD, Williamson, PD, Mattson, RH. The localizing value of depth electroencephalography in 32 patients with refractory epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 1982;12:24853.Google Scholar
14. Gloor, P. Neurosurgical management of the epilepsies. Adv Neurol. 1975; 9: 59105 Google Scholar
15. So, EL. Integration of EEG, MRI, and SPECT in localizing the seizure focus for epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2000;41 Suppl 3:S4854.Google Scholar
16. Wellmer, J, von der Groeben, F, Klarmann, U, Weber, C, Elger, CE, Urbach, H, Clusmann, H, von Lehe, M. Risks and benefits of invasive epilepsy surgery workup with implanted subdural and depth electrodes. Epilepsia. 2012; 10:15281167 Google Scholar
17. Dubeau, F, McLachlan, RS. Invasive electrograhic recording techniques in temporal lobe epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci. 2000; 27 Suppl 1: S2934 Google Scholar
18. Cossu, M, Cardinale, F, Castana, L, et al. Stereoelectro-encephalography in the Presurgical Evaluation of Focal Epilepsy: a Retrospective Analysis of 215 Procedures. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:70618.Google Scholar
19. MacDougall, KW, Steven, DA, Parrent, AG, Burneo, JG. Supplementary implantation of intracranial electrodes in the evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Res. 2009;87:9510120.Google Scholar
20. Pilcher, WH, Roberts, DW, Flanigin, HF, Crandall, PH, Wieser, HG, Ojemann, GA. Complications of epilepsy surgery. In: Engel, J, ed. Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. 2 ed. New York: Raven Press; 1993:56581.Google Scholar
21. de Almeida, N. A, Olivier, A, et al. Efficacy of and morbidity associated with stereoencephalography using computed tomography- or magnetic resonance imaging-guided electrode implantation. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:4837.Google Scholar
22. Van Buren, JM. Complications of surgical procedures in the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy. In: Engel, J, ed. Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. New York: Raven Press; 1987:46575.Google Scholar
23. Ross, DA, Brunberg, JA, Drury, I, Henry, TR. Intracerebral depth electrode monitoring in partial epilepsy: the morbidity and efficacy of placement using magnetic resonace image-guided stereotactic surgery. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:32734.Google Scholar
24. Spencer, SS, So, NK, Engel, J, Williamson, PD, Levesque, MF, Spencer, DD. Depth electrodes. In: Engel, J, ed. Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. New York: Raven Press; 1993:35976.Google Scholar
25. Tanriverdi, T, Ajlan, A, Poulin, N, Olivier, A. Morbidity in epilepsy surgery: an experience based on 2449 epilepsy surgery procedures from a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2009; 110:111123.Google Scholar
26. Wyler, AR, Walker, G, Somes, G. The morbidity of long-term seizure monitoring using subdural strip electrodes. J Neurosurg 1991;74: 7347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Burneo, JG, Steven, DA, McLachlan, RS, Parrent, AG. Morbidity associated with the use of intracranial electrodes for epilepsy surgery. Can J Neurol Sci. 2006;33:2237.Google Scholar
28. MacDougall, KW, Burneo, JG, McLachlan, RS, Steven, DA. Outcome of epilepsy surgery in patients investigated with subdural electrodes. Epilepsy Res. 2009;85:23542 Google Scholar