Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T13:12:50.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimal Relations for Certain Wreath Products of Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

D. L. Johnson
D. L. Johnson*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let p be a rational prime, G a non-trivial finite p group, and K the field of p elements, regarded as a trivial G-module according to context; then we define:

d(G) = dimKH1(G, K), the minimal number of generators of G,

r(G) = dimKH2(G, K),

r′(G) = the minimal number of relations required to define G,

where, in the last equation, it is sufficient to take the minimum over those presentations of G with d(G) generators. It is well known (see § 2) that the following inequalities hold:

We shall consider only finite p-groups, so that the class of groups with r = d coincides with that consisting of those groups whose Schur multiplicator is trivial.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , 01 October 1970 , pp. 1005 - 1009
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1970

References

1. Bogacenko, I. V., On the structure of the cohomology rings of Sylow subgroups of symmetric groups, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 27 (1963), 937–942.Google Scholar
2. Borevic, Z. I. and Faddeev, D. K., Theory of homology in groups. II. Projective resolutions of finite groups, Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. 14 (1959), 72–87.Google Scholar
3. Gruenberg, K. W., Some cohomological topics in group theory, Queen Mary College Mathematics Notes, London, 1967.Google Scholar
4. Lyndon, R. C., The cohomology theory of group extensions, Duke Math. J. 15 (1948), 271–292.Google Scholar
5. Lyndon, R. C., Cohomology theory of groups with a single defining relation, Ann. of Math. (2) 52 (1950), 650–665.Google Scholar