^{page 155 note a} The first and last letters of this word are damaged.

^{page 155 note b} This word is damaged.

^{page 155 note 1} 1286–87.

^{page 155 note 2} 1287–88.

^{page 155 note 3} 1284–85.

^{page 156 note a} per tall', interlined.

^{page 156 note b} A short erasure, covered with a dash, follows.

^{page 156 note c} The figures in this sum have been altered.

^{page 156 note 1} At this time one of the abbot's tenants at Staines, and perhaps also bailiff of the manor (W.A.M. 16911).

^{page 156 note 2} The composition of 1283–84 bound Wenlok to assign Great Amwell to the convent, and he did so later in 1288 (below, p. 231 and note).

^{page 157 note d} preposito preposito, MS.

^{page 157 note e} ij, altered from iij.

^{page 157 note 1} Sacrist in 1288 (Monks, p. 62).Google Scholar

^{page 158 note a} This entry is written in different ink.

^{page 158 note b} Sic in MS.

^{page 158 note c} Summa expensarum per idem tempus celix li. ix s. x d. ob. qua., struck out.

^{page 158 note 1} 17 Mar. 1288–20 June 1289. The account here audited consisted of three receipts rolls and concurrent expenses rolls.

^{page 158 note 2} 17 Mar.–29 Sept. 1288. The receipts account for this period is now W.A.M. 24252 (above, II. 1); in fact it runs from 13 Mar. to 29 Sept. 1288.

^{page 158 note 3} A fragment of the current household day-account, covering the period 1–28 Sept. 1288, survives (W.A.M. 24494).

^{page 158 note 4} 29 Sept. 1288–20 Mar. 1289.

^{page 158 note 5} Less than half these expenses appear on the current household day-account, which now runs from 17 Oct. 1288 to 20 Mar. 1289 (W.A.M. 24495). The rest would have appeared on a classified expenses account, no longer extant (see above, p. 13). The first membrane of W.A.M. 24495 is missing; originally, no doubt, the account ran from 29 Sept. 1288.

^{page 159 note d} qu', struck out.

^{page 159 note e} The account began with an entry of arrears which was struck out and is now illegible.

^{page 159 note f} x, written over an erasure.

^{page 159 note g} ij, written over an erasure.

^{page 159 note h} v, written over an erasure.

^{page 159 note i} x, written over an erasure.

^{page 159 note j} The sum is written over an erasure.

^{page 159 note 1} 20 Mar.–20 June 1289.

^{page 159 note 2} Kilburn Priory was a dependency of Westminster Abbey.

^{page 159 note 3} The balance should have been £1 Is. 7¾d.

^{page 160 note a} xlv, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note b} vij, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note c} iiij, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note d} vij, altered from vj.

^{page 160 note e} vij s. iiij d., written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note f} li. vij s. ix d. ob. qua., written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note g} vij, altered from vj.

^{page 160 note h} ix d. ob. qua., written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note i} j, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note j} ix, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note k} xvj, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note l} ix, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note m} The last digit of lvij, and li.j, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note n} ij, written over an erasure.

^{page 160 note 1} A payment instead of a yearly hospice to which the abbot was entitled from his tenant at Deene (Stenton, First Century of English Feudalism, pp. 267–69).

^{page 161 note O} cclvj li. xiiij s. ix d. ob., in the margin, of which sum xiiij s. is interlined, xix s. having been struck out.

^{page 161 note p} xl, interlined.

^{page 161 note q} MS. illegible.

^{page 161 note 1} A similar payment from the abbot's tenant at Hendon (see Westminster Domesday, fos 121V–122V; Flete, pp. 123–24).Google Scholar

^{page 161 note 2} Controller of the king's wardrobe (Tout, , Chapters, vi, p. 28Google Scholar, ‘Langton’).

^{page 161 note 3} The abbot seems to have been entitled to 10 marks a year from the convent instead of a hospice at Oakham (below, p. 231). As Oakham was, at this date, assigned to the pittancery, it may be assumed that Brother Henry de Waledene was pittancer in 1289–90. The fruits of the church of Uppingham were probably the revenues of the church accruing to the abbot of Westminster during the vacancy which ended with the institution of William de Bray on 24 Aug. 1289 (Rolls and Register of Bishop Oliver Sutton, 1280–1299, ed. R. M. T. Hill, ii (Lincoln Record Soc., xliii, 1950), p. 77Google Scholar). Wenlok appears to have employed the pittancer, who was warden of the nearby manor of Oakham, to collect them.

^{page 161 note 4} A contribution from the warden of St Mary's chapel in Westminster Abbey for the anniversary of Prior Robert de Molesham (see Customary, ii, p. 92).Google Scholar

^{page 162 note a} Sic in MS.

^{page 162 note b} lxvj s., written over an erasure.

^{page 162 note c} cclxxiij li., interlined; cclxiij li., struck out. A different sum has been erased.

^{page 162 note d} dclxvij li. vij s., interlined; dclviij li. iij d. ob. qua., struck out; a different sum of receipts has been erased.

^{page 162 note e} Sic in MS.

^{page 162 note f} Sic in MS.;? read et dimidie marce.

^{page 162 note 1} Botecourte and Marche were later royal justices (C.C.R., 1288–96, p. 222Google Scholar, ‘Buteturt’; C.P.R., 1281–92, p. 457).Google Scholar

^{page 163 note f} coco, interlined.

^{page 163 note 1} Wife of William le Brun senior (C.C.R., 1288–96, p. 66).Google Scholar

^{page 163 note 2} Probably the royal justice of this name (C.P.R., 1281–92, p. 396Google Scholar, ‘Peuelesdon’); but see also I. 265, 314, and below, p. 175.

^{page 163 note 3} 7 Feb. 1290.

^{page 163 note 4} 9 Feb. 1290.

^{page 163 note 5} 10 Feb. 1290.

^{page 164 note 1} 29 Sept. 1289.

^{page 164 note 2} 1 Jan. 1290.

^{page 164 note 3} 1 Oct. 1289.

^{page 164 note 4} 2 Oct. 1289.

^{page 165 note a} sol' written above the sum.

^{page 165 note 1} 8 Oct. 1289.

^{page 165 note 2} 13 Oct. 1289.

^{page 165 note 3} Knights of Edward I, ed. C. Moor, v (Harleian Soc., lxxxiv, 1932), pp. 20–24Google Scholar, ‘Tibotot’.

^{page 165 note 4} 13 Oct. 1289.

^{page 165 note 5} 14 Oct. 1289.

^{page 166 note a} festum, interlined.

^{page 166 note b} The last three digits of viij are written over an erasure.

^{page 166 note 1} In 1289 the abbot and convent of Westminster appealed against Archbishop Pecham's assertion of visitation rights at Great Malvern Priory. The bishops of Bath and Wells and of Winchester were judges delegate in the case, which was remitted to Rome, however, on the lapse of the term set for its hearing; see W.A.M. 22931–32.

^{page 167 note c} pignus, interlined.

^{page 167 note d} An erasure follows.

^{page 167 note e} Sic in MS.

^{page 167 note f} sol', written above the sum.

^{page 167 note 1} Fee for the quarter beginning on 29 Sept. 1289.

^{page 167 note 2} Part of fee for the quarter beginning on 25 Dec. 1289.

^{page 167 note 3} Fee for the same quarter.

^{page 167 note 4} Master John de Pelham, rector of St Bride's, Fleet Street (W.A.M. 22929).

^{page 167 note 5} The abbot was repaying a loan of 60 marks from the nuns of Kilburn (W.A.M. 4848).

^{page 167 note 6} Stipends for the quarter beginning on 29 Sept. 1289.

^{page 168 note a} festum, interlined.

^{page 168 note b} sic in MS.

^{page 168 note c} sol', written above the sum.

^{page 168 note 1} 12 Nov. 1289.

^{page 168 note 2} 31 Oct. 1289.

^{page 168 note 3} 11 Nov. 1289.

^{page 168 note 4} The anniversary of Henry III was observed on 14 or 15 Nov. (W. A. M. 33351, 5258B).

^{page 168 note 5} 8 Dec. 1289.

^{page 168 note 6} 14 Nov. 1289.

^{page 169 note d} d., interlined.

^{page 169 note e} In the summary day-accounts which follow here and on pp. 179–83 and pp. 188–91 three sets of initial letters which occur frequently—J. S., K. W. and R. P.—have not been extended unless they are extended in the MS., and the word soluti—indicating a cash transaction—which in the MS. is written indifferently above the sum it describes or after it, has been transcribed as part of the text and not as a superscription. In the MS. the entries are arranged in columns and the place-names are marginal entries.

^{page 169 note 1} I. 156, note.

^{page 169 note 2} 29 Sept. 1289. The summary day-account which follows extends until 26 Nov. 1289.

^{page 170 note a} ibidem, struck out.

^{page 170 note b} Totum de stauro, written against the last two entries, which are bracketed.

^{page 170 note 1} The manor of Wandsworth was assigned to the infirmary.

^{page 170 note 2} 31 Oct. 1289.

^{page 171 note c} ibidem, struck out.

^{page 171 note d} P., interlined.

^{page 171 note e} Summa denariorum solutorum istius partis rotuli xxxvj s. viij d. ob., written in the top left-hand corner of this roll; this note does not appear to relate to this account.

^{page 171 note 1} 25 Dec. 1289.

^{page 171 note 2} 28 Dec. 1289.

^{page 171 note 3} 2 Jan. 1290.

^{page 172 note a} xiij s., interlined.

^{page 172 note b} There is an erasure above this sum; sol', written in the left-hand margin against this entry.

^{page 172 note c} sol', written above this sum.

^{page 172 note d} quia in mareskallia forinseca, written above In candelis P[ar]is', struck cut.

^{page 172 note e} The second letter of this name is interlined.

^{page 172 note f} This entry is in the margin.

^{page 172 note g} iij, altered from iiij.

^{page 172 note h} quia in mareskallia forinseca, written above In xvj libris candelarum P[ar]is' ij s. Item in iiij libris candelarum de sepo vj d., struck out.

^{page 172 note i} x d., interlined.

^{page 172 note 1} 4 Jan. 1290.

^{page 172 note 2} 14 Jan. 1290.

^{page 172 note 3} Probably William Louth, keeper of the king's wardrobe (Tout, , Chapters, vi, p. 26).Google Scholar

^{page 172 note 4} 28 Jan. 1290.

^{page 172 note 5} 1 Feb. 1290.

^{page 172 note 6} 3 Feb. 1290. Kirkeby was treasurer of the Exchequer (Tout, , Chapters, vi, p. 19).Google Scholar

^{page 172 note 7} 4 Feb. 1290.

^{page 172 note 8} 8 Feb. 1290.

^{page 173 note j} sotularum, interlined.

^{page 173 note k} There is an erasure above this figure.

^{page 173 note l} Sic in MS. In ij pixidibus de pinaz viij s. Item in x libris albi pulveris vj s. viij d. In viij libris seminis ij s., struck out; quia supra, written above each of these three entries. The second entry was written over an erasure.

^{page 173 note m} xij s., written over an erasure.

^{page 173 note n} ix, written over an erasure.

^{page 173 note o} Memorandum de vino, in margin.

^{page 173 note p} Sic in MS.

^{page 173 note q} deb', struck out.

^{page 173 note 1} 14 and 18 Oct. 1289.

^{page 173 note 2} Above, pp. 169–70.

^{page 173 note 3} A payment on account for credit of more than £7 from John de Sawbridge-worth entered on this roll or overstanding from the last.

^{page 173 note 4} 13 Oct. 1289.

^{page 173 note 5} A payment on account for credit of more than £26 from Robert de Coleworth, alias Pikeman, entered on this roll or overstanding from the last (above, p. 171; below, p. 183).

^{page 174 note a} The rest of this entry is left blank.

^{page 174 note b} Pensiones. Liberati domino R. de Sancto Albano clerico regine in partem solucionis pensionis sibi debite de termino … [MS. blank] xxvj s. Item magistro Waltero de Clune in partem solucionis termini sancti Michaelis, anno regni Edwardi xviij, x s., unde aquietancia. Summa xxxvj s. Lib' Willelmo de Clune in partem solucionis terre de Sponhull' ab eodem empte xxxiij li. xiij s. iiij d., unde aquietancia. Item liberati Thome de Lodelawe ad prosequendam seysinam ejusdem terre vj s. Item pro fine levata in bancho et pro scriptura iiij s. iiij d., struck out; quia inferius plenius, in the margin.

^{page 174 note c} sol', written above the sum.

^{page 174 note 1} See above, pp. 169–71 and below, pp. 179–81. The period mentioned was 13 Oct. 1289–15 Feb. 1290.

^{page 174 note 2} 26 Dec. 1289.

^{page 174 note 3} 8 Feb. 1290.

^{page 174 note 4} Stipends for the quarter beginning on 25 Dec. 1289.

^{page 175 note d} Sic in MS.

^{page 175 note e} Sic in MS.; read puncturam.

^{page 175 note f} iij s., written over an erasure.

^{page 175 note g} sol', written above the sum.

^{page 175 note h} Sic in MS.

^{page 175 note i} MS. blank.

^{page 175 note 1} Stipend for the same quarter.

^{page 175 note 2} 25 Feb. 1290.

^{page 175 note 3} 26 Feb. 1290.

^{page 175 note 4} 2 Apr. 1290.

^{page 175 note 5} 2 Feb. 1290.

^{page 175 note 6} 10 Mar. 1290.

^{page 175 note 7} 20 June 1290.

^{page 176 note a} ij, altered by erasure.

^{page 176 note b} The last eight words are interlined.

^{page 176 note c} unde aquietancia, written above.

^{page 176 note 1} The term is probably the half-year beginning on 29 Sept. 1289.

^{page 176 note 2} 1289–90.

^{page 176 note 3} In fact 40s. was the amount of Leham's fee for the whole year (above, pp. 28–30, note).

^{page 176 note 4} Fee for the half-year beginning at Easter (2 Apr.) 1290.

^{page 176 note 5} Fee for the same term; the acquittance from Bereford is dated at West minster, 9 May 1290 (W.A.M. 28857).

^{page 176 note 6} Fee for the years 1288–90; the acquittance from Kellawe is dated at West-minster, 9 May 1290 (W.A.M. 28855).

^{page 176 note 7} This and the next three payments are fees for the half-year beginning at Easter (2 Apr.) 1290; acquittances from Southcot, Barre and Gosfield are dated at Westminster on 9 May 1290, and from Alexander de Coventry at Westminster on 10 May 1290 (W.A.M. 28854, 28856, 28858–59).

^{page 176 note 8} These acquittances are dated respectively at Westminster, 14 Feb. 1290, at Sutton-under-Brailes, 9 Apr. 1290, at Westminster, 23 May 1290, and at Wenlock, 26 July 1290 (W.A.M. 28852*, 28853, 28860, 28865; see Pearce, , Walter de Wenlok, pp. 62–63Google Scholar). The money paid to Clun was the price of land, together with crops and implements, at Spoonbill, which he had sold to the abbot's mother. A recognizance was executed on 14 Feb. 1290, when the first instalment was paid (C.C.R., 1288–1296, p. 126).Google Scholar

^{page 177 note d} longe harnesii, MS.; but longe is marked for transposition.

^{page 177 note e} The last three entries are in the margin but are marked for insertion at this point.

^{page 177 note 1} The hospital of St James at Westminster.

^{page 177 note 2} 2 Apr. 1290.

^{page 177 note 3} 30 Mar. 1290.

^{page 177 note 4} 5 Apr. 1290.

^{page 178 note a} ob., interlined.

^{page 178 note b} A sum has been erased in the margin at this point.

^{page 178 note c} viiij, altered from viij.

^{page 178 note d} ciij s., written over an erasure.

^{page 178 note 1} 2 May 1290.

^{page 178 note 2} 16 Apr. 1290.

^{page 178 note 3} 1 Aug. 1290.

^{page 178 note 4} 14 Apr. 1290.

^{page 178 note 5} 27 Apr. 1290.

^{page 179 note e} xj s. ix d. qua., written over an erasure.

^{page 179 note f} Sic in MS.

^{page 179 note g} sabbato, written above.

^{page 179 note h} See above, p. 169, note.

^{page 179 note i} The sum is written in the margin.

^{page 179 note 1} 14 Jan. 1290. See below, p. 180.

^{page 179 note 2} 27 Nov. 1289. The summary day-account which follows extends until 3 May 1290.

^{page 180 note a} A mark has been made in the margin against the last two entries.

^{page 180 note b} A mark has been made in the margin against this entry.

^{page 181 note c} The sum is illegible.

^{page 181 note d} viij, altered from vij.

^{page 181 note e} ob., interlined.

^{page 181 note f} This entry is written vertically in the margin but marked for insertion.

^{page 181 note g} Sic in MS.

^{page 182 note a} Sic in MS.

^{page 183 note 1} 4 May 1290.

^{page 183 note 2} Repayment of part of a loan of £48; the acquittance from Romain is dated at London, 29 Aug. 1290 (W.A.M. 28866).

^{page 184 note a} ij s. ij s., MS.

^{page 184 note 1} 9 Mar. 1290. Part of the debt thus acquitted is entered at the head of the dorse of the last roll, before the day entries begin (above, p. 179).

^{page 184 note 2} 2 Apr.–28 May 1290.

^{page 184 note 3} 28 Sept. 1289.

^{page 184 note 4} 1288–89.

^{page 185 note b} viij d., written over an erasure.

^{page 185 note c} lxviij s., in the margin.

^{page 185 note 1} Stipends for the quarter beginning at Easter (2 Apr.) 1290.

^{page 185 note 2} 18 June 1290.

^{page 185 note 3} 20 June 1290.

^{page 185 note 4} The abbot was defendant against Ralph le Rus in a plea of novel disseisin relating to land at Westminster and ‘Eye’ (P.R.O., C.P.40/83, m. 28 d).

^{page 185 note 5} 21 May 1290.

^{page 186 note a} Part of this sum is written over an erasure.

^{page 186 note 1} 12 May 1290.

^{page 186 note 2} 20 June 1290.

^{page 186 note 3} 24 June.

^{page 186 note 4} Stipend for the quarter beginning at Easter (2 Apr.) 1290.

^{page 186 note 6} 14 July 1290.

^{page 186 note 6} 17 July 1290.

^{page 186 note 7} Probably the payment to the infirmarer of the tithes of St Andrew's church, Pershore, which the abbot of Westminster received from Great Malvern Priory in accordance with an agreement made in the early thirteenth century (W.A.M. 22493). The tithes were assigned to the infirmarer for the anniversary of Abbot William Humez (Flete p. 102).Google Scholar

^{page 186 note 8} 19 July 1290.

^{page 187 note b} vj, written over an erasure.

^{page 187 note c} The first three letters of this word are written over an erasure.

^{page 187 note d} cxviij s. xj d. ob., in the margin.

^{page 187 note 1} Stipend for the quarter beginning on 24 June 1290.

^{page 187 note 2} 30–31 July 1290.

^{page 187 note 3} 5 Aug. 1290.

^{page 187 note 4} 9 Aug. 1290.

^{page 187 note 5} 13 Aug. 1290.

^{page 187 note 6} 16 Aug. 1290.

^{page 187 note 7} 22 Aug. 1290.

^{page 188 note a} et, written over an erasure.

^{page 188 note b} Summa ciiij^xx li. vij s. xj d. ob. qua. [altered from clxx li. vij s. j d. ob. qua.], and Summa solucionum clij li. xix s. vij d. ob. qua. [struck out], at the bottom edge of the roll and now in the fold between it and the membrane stitched on as a wrapper.

^{page 188 note c} See above, p. 169, note.

^{page 188 note d} pro sale, written above the sum.

^{page 188 note 1} 6 Sept. 1290.

^{page 188 note 2} 4 May 1290. The summary day-account which follows extends until 5 Sept. 1290.

^{page 191 note a} The last five words are written over an erasure.

^{page 191 note b} MS. blank.

^{page 192 note a} Memorandum quod magister Robertus de Brug' tenetur respondere Roberto Pikeman de xxxvij s. j d. qui non intrantur in rotulo, in the margin.

^{page 192 note b} Sum interlined; ix li. xvij s. viij d. ob., struck out.

^{page 192 note c} Sum interlined; xxiiij li. xix s. iiij d., struck out.

^{page 192 note d} Sum interlined; lxxvij s. ix d. ob., struck out.

^{page 192 note 1} 1289–90.

^{page 193 note e} xviij li., written over an erasure.

^{page 193 note f} v tallias, interlined; iiij tallias, struck out.

^{page 193 note g} The last two digits are written over an erasure.

^{page 193 note h} Sum interlined; iiij li. iij s. iiij d., struck out.

^{page 193 note i} Sum interlined; cxxviij li. xj s. vij d. ob., struck out.

^{page 193 note j} et deficit breve de iiij li. xiij s. x d., struck out.

^{page 193 note k} The same sum is struck out on the right.

^{page 193 note 1} 1297. The sum of 10 marks should have acquitted the abbot's claim to a hospice at Oakham for a whole year (below, p. 231). It would appear that Brother R. de Bures was pittancer (above, p. 161, note).

^{page 193 note 2} 1296–97.

^{page 193 note 3} One of these writs is I.138.

^{page 193 note 4} I.136–38. The sum of £8 2s. ½d. was paid to Brother Adam without written warrant.

^{page 194 note a} The same sum is struck out on the right.

^{page 194 note b} xx s., interlined; xxx s., struck out.

^{page 194 note c} ij, interlined.

^{page 194 note d} Sic in MS. ij, interlined; idem, struck out.

^{page 194 note e} xx s., interlined; xxx s., struck out.

^{page 194 note f} Item Rogero de Hegham x s. per aquietanciam et breve, struck out.

^{page 194 note g} Sum interlined; vj s. viij d., struck out.

^{page 194 note h} x s., struck out.

^{page 194 note i} Spigurnel x s., struck out.

^{page 194 note j} xiij li., interlined; xv li., struck out. A short erasure follows this sum.

^{page 194 note k} The last four words are interlined.

^{page 194 note 1} I.138.

^{page 194 note 2} Ibid. This writ also warrants the next three payments.

^{page 194 note 3} One of these writs is I.138.

^{page 194 note 4} Ibid.

^{page 194 note 5} This and the next three payments are fees for the year beginning on 29 Sept. 1297. In each case the first instalment was paid without written warrant. Acquittances for it from Barre and Southcot are dated at Westminster, 30 Oct. and 7 Nov. 1297 respectively (W. A.M. 29031–32). I.138 warrants the second instalment.

^{page 194 note 6} The tenth of 1297 from the abbot's temporalities in Islip, due in two instalments, on 13 Jan. and 16 Mar. 1298 (Reg. Roberti Winchelsey, i, p. 211).Google Scholar

^{page 194 note 7} The same from the abbot's temporalities in London and Midd. I.138 warrants the payment of the first instalment.

^{page 195 note l} ob. et qua., interlined; xv li. xvj s. xj d., struck out on the right.

^{page 195 note m} The last four words are interlined.

^{page 195 note n} There is an erasure above this sum.

^{page 195 note o} vj s., written over an erasure.

^{page 195 note p} Sum written over an erasure.

^{page 195 note q} Sic in MS.

^{page 195 note 1} The procurations of the cardinal bishops of Albano and Palestrina from the abbot's temporalities in Islip for 1296 and 1297. This sum represents 4d. in the mark for 1296 and 3d. in the mark for 1297 on the valuation of Islip (£17 9s.) in the Taxation of Pope Nicholas (Taxatio Ecclesiastica, p. 45Google Scholar; see Lunt, , Financial Relations of the Papacy with England, pp. 554–55).Google Scholar

^{page 195 note 2} The same, at the same rates, for the abbot's temporalities in the archdeaconry of Middlesex (see Taxatio Ecclesiastica, p. 13).Google Scholar

^{page 195 note 3} See I.138.

^{page 195 note 4} Ibid.

^{page 195 note 5} The reference is to Brother Alexander's receipts and expenses accounts as steward of the household for the year 1289–90 (17–18 Edward I), II. 3, 5.

^{page 195 note 6} Presumably the account for the period of Brother Henry's joint receivership with Brother Roger de Aldenham earlier in 1305 (above, p. 27, note).

^{page 196 note a} per talliam, interlined.

^{page 196 note b} per talliam, interlined.

^{page 196 note c} liber', interlined.

^{page 196 note 1} 13 Dec. 1305.

^{page 196 note 2} Above, p. 161, note. Hendon was now held in demesne by the prior and convent of Westminster, but the abbot continued to claim his hospice.

^{page 196 note 3} One of these is I. 162.

^{page 196 note 4} I.159.

^{page 197 note d} unde tallia, interlined.

^{page 197 note e} mandatum domini, interlined over an erasure.

^{page 197 note f} Sic in MS.

^{page 197 note g} decima, in the margin.

^{page 197 note h} videantur rotuli hospicii de istis et aliis parcellis hospicium tangentibus, in the margin.

^{page 197 note i} Sic in MS.

^{page 197 note j} fiat tallia de v j li., in the margin.

^{page 197 note k} This entry was added later.

^{page 197 note l} cxxxv li. xv s. vij d. qua. et lx s., in the margin.

^{page 197 note 1} I. 186, 191, 193, 209.

^{page 197 note 2} I. 160.

^{page 197 note 3} I. 215.

^{page 197 note 4} I. 179, 194.

^{page 197 note 5} I. 189.

^{page 197 note 6} I. 194.

^{page 197 note 7} See I. 200.

^{page 197 note 8} I. 203.

^{page 197 note 9} I. 204.

^{page 197 note 10} I. 210.

^{page 197 note 11} I. 216.

^{page 197 note 12} I. 211.

^{page 197 note 13} I. 208.

^{page 197 note 14} Fee for the period from Easter (18 Apr.) 1305 to 29 Sept. 1306.

^{page 198 note a} Sum altered from xxij li. … s. ij d. ob.

^{page 198 note b} li., written over an erasure; summa patet, in the margin.

^{page 198 note c} viij s., written over an erasure.

^{page 198 note d} xiij s., written over an erasure.

^{page 198 note e} d. per preceptum, interlined. The sum is written over an erasure.

^{page 198 note f} xx s., written over an erasure.

^{page 198 note g} The same sum is repeated in the margin.

^{page 198 note h} dandum, interlined.

^{page 198 note i} domino, interlined.

^{page 198 note j} s., interlined.

^{page 198 note 1} See I. 167, note.

^{page 198 note 2} I.156.

^{page 198 note 3} Ibid.

^{page 198 note 4} Fee for the half-year beginning on 1 Nov. 1305.

^{page 198 note 5} Repayment of part of a loan of 9 marks; the acquittance from Rokesle is dated at Westminster, 26 Mar. 1306 (W.A.M. 29192). For Rokesle see Beaven, , Aldermen of the City of London, i. p. 173.Google Scholar

^{page 198 note 6} I. 187.

^{page 198 note 7} I. 180.

^{page 198 note 8} I. 184.

^{page 198 note 9} I. 190.

^{page 198 note 10} I. 205.

^{page 198 note 11} I. 178.

^{page 198 note 12} I. 183.

^{page 198 note 13} I. 188.

^{page 199 note k} The same sum is repeated in the margin.

^{page 199 note l} Primus rotulus, added later.

^{page 199 note m} ij d., altered from iiij d.

^{page 199 note 1} I. 192.

^{page 199 note 2} I. 195.

^{page 199 note 3} I. 196.

^{page 199 note 4} I. 197.

^{page 199 note 5} I. 201.

^{page 199 note 6} I. 217.

^{page 199 note 7} I. 200.

^{page 199 note 8} I. 220.

^{page 200 note a} Hole in MS.

^{page 200 note b} litera obligatoria liberabatur fratri R. de Beby, in the margin.

^{page 200 note c} Sic in MS.

^{page 200 note 1} Probably the farm of Yeoveney for the year beginning on 29 Sept. 1306.

^{page 200 note 2} 1305–6.

^{page 200 note 3} John de la More was reeve of Siaines from 7 Dec. 1302 until 22 June 1306 (W.A.M. 16926–27).

^{page 200 note 4} 5 June 1307.

^{page 201 note d} vini, interlined.

^{page 201 note e} acquietancia traditur Willelmo de Curtl', in the margin.

^{page 201 note f} alocantur per indenturam W. Merre, written above per aquietanciam, struck out; debet acquietancias, in the margin. The superscription means that the original indenture between Hegham and the abbot was accepted as a sufficient voucher by the steward of the lands when he audited the account; the usual acquittance was lacking. The words in the margin relate to this entry and the next.

^{page 201 note g} allocantur per indenturam W. Merr', written above per aquietanciam, struck out. For the meaning of the superscription see n.f above.

^{page 201 note h} unde aquietancia, interlined.

^{page 201 note 1} This precept may be I. 262.

^{page 201 note 2} I. 227.

^{page 201 note 3} I. 219.

^{page 201 note 4} I. 221.

^{page 201 note 5} I. 222.

^{page 202 note a} The last entry was added later.

^{page 202 note b} The last four words are interlined.

^{page 202 note c} ij d., written over an erasure.

^{page 202 note d} xxvij, de quibus liberabantur Thome de An'mot xx floreni ut patet in compoto ultimi anni, interlined at this point. (In fact the entry appears in the following account; see below, p. 213.)

^{page 202 note e} de quibus inde habet respectum in presenti compoto, in the margin.

^{page 202 note f} tallia per dominum, interlined; litera obligatoria, struck out.

^{page 202 note 1} I. 174.

^{page 202 note 2} I. 224.

^{page 202 note 3} I. 223.

^{page 202 note 4} I. 225.

^{page 202 note 5} I. 226.

^{page 202 note 6} I. 228.

^{page 202 note 7} 28 July–30 Nov. 1306.

^{page 202 note 8} Fee for the year beginning on 25 Dec. 1306. For the first instalment see 1.229. The acquittance from Abingdon for the second instalment is dated at West-minster, 7 July 1307 (W.A.M. 29237).

^{page 202 note 9} I. 229.

^{page 202 note 10} Fee for the half-year beginning on 29 Sept. 1306; the acquittance from Barre is dated at Westminster, 11 Nov. 1306 (W.A.M. 29195).

^{page 203 note g} et missis cardinali, interlined.

^{page 203 note 1} I. 230.

^{page 203 note 2} I. 231.

^{page 203 note 3} I. 232.

^{page 203 note 4} I. 233.

^{page 203 note 5} I. 234.

^{page 203 note 6} I. 235.

^{page 203 note 7} Peter of Spain, cardinal bishop of Sabina.

^{page 203 note 8} The second instalment of the septennial tenth of 1305 from the abbot's temporalities in Midd., due on 7 Dec. 1306 (Lunt, , Financial Relations of the Papacy with England, p. 384).Google Scholar

^{page 204 note a} et remanent, interlined.

^{page 204 note b} per aquietanciam, interlined.

^{page 204 note c} viij, altered from vij.

^{page 204 note d} per talliam, struck out.

^{page 204 note e} per ij, interlined.

^{page 204 note 1} According to the Annales Londonenses Peter of Spain arrived in London on 11 Feb. 1307 (Chronicles of the Reigns of Edward I and Edward II, ed. W. Stubbs (Rolls Ser., 1882–1883), i, p. 150).Google Scholar

^{page 204 note 2} Fee for the half-year beginning on 29 Sept. 1306; the acquittance from Ludgarshall is dated at London, 1 Feb. 1307 (W.A.M. 29226).

^{page 204 note 3} I. 236.

^{page 204 note 4} I. 237.

^{page 204 note 5} See I. 239.

^{page 204 note 6} See I. 241.

^{page 204 note 7} I. 238.

^{page 204 note 8} I. 240.

^{page 205 note f} lx, altered from l.

^{page 205 note g} xxx, altered from xx.

^{page 205 note h} Sic in MS; read item.

^{page 205 note i} This entry was added later.

^{page 205 note j} MS damaged.

^{page 205 note k} per, written over an erasure.

^{page 205 note l} Sic in MS.

^{page 205 note m} per, written over an erasure.

^{page 205 note 1} I. 241.

^{page 205 note 2} I. 242.

^{page 205 note 3} I. 243.

^{page 205 note 4} I. 244.

^{page 205 note 6} I. 246.

^{page 205 note 6} Fee for the year beginning on 29 Sept. 1306.

^{page 205 note 7} See n. 5 above.

^{page 205 note 8} I. 245.

^{page 205 note 9} I. 247.

^{page 205 note 10} I. 248.

^{page 205 note 11} I. 249.

^{page 205 note 12} I. 251.

^{page 206 note a} per, written over an erasure.

^{page 206 note b} per acquietanciam, interlined.

^{page 206 note c} anni xxxiii^ti, interlined.

^{page 206 note d} parte x s., written over an erasure; per talliam, interlined.

^{page 206 note 1} I. 250.

^{page 206 note 2} I. 252.

^{page 206 note 3} I. 253.

^{page 206 note 4} Public notary (W.A.M. 29155).

^{page 206 note 5} The third instalment of the septennial tenth of 1305 from the abbot's temporalities in Pyrford, due on 8 May 1307 (Lunt, Financial Relations of the Papacy with England, p. 384).

^{page 206 note 6} Duddele's fee for the period 29 Sept. 1306–25 July 1307.

^{page 206 note 7} Peter de Columna, cardinal deacon of St Angelus in foro piscium (C. Eubel, Hierarchia Catholica Medii Aevi, i (Leipzig, 1898), p. 47).

^{page 206 note 8} 14 May 1307.

^{page 206 note 9} I. 254.

^{page 206 note 10} I. 255.

^{page 206 note 11} I. 257.

^{page 207 note e} solut', interlined; mutuat', struck out.

^{page 207 note f} de exitu respondetur in anno sequenti, in the margin.

^{page 207 note g} s., interlined.

^{page 207 note h} xl, altered; iiij d., struck out.

^{page 207 note i} Both figures have been altered.

^{page 207 note 1} I. 256.

^{page 207 note 2} I. 258.

^{page 207 note 3} I. 259.

^{page 207 note 4} I. 260.

^{page 207 note 5} I. 261.

^{page 207 note 6} Arrears of fee for the year beginning on 25 Dec. 1305, and fee for the year beginning on 25 Dec. 1306; the acquittance from Nassington is dated at London, 29 Aug. 1307 (W.A.M. 29242).

^{page 208 note a} Sic in MS.

^{page 208 note b} iij d., interlined; per talliam, struck out.

^{page 208 note c} The last sixteen words are interlined.

^{page 208 note 1} The acquittance is dated at Westminster, 14 Sept. 1307 (W.A.M. 29243).

^{page 208 note 2} Wenlok deprived Prior Reginald de Hadham of his office on 2 Sept. 1307 (above, p. 18).

^{page 208 note 3} Fee for the period 24 June 1307–Easter (14 Apr.) 1308. For the cup, see above, p. 204.

^{page 208 note 4} 23 July–29 Sept. 1307.

^{page 208 note 5} I. 262 warranted these payments to the stewards of the household.

^{page 208 note 6} I. 218.

^{page 208 note 7} I. 237.

^{page 209 note d} The last five words were written later than the rest of the heading.

^{page 209 note e} MS., ixd. d.; ix d., interlined. The sum has been altered by erasure.

^{page 209 note f} Perschor', written over an erasure.

^{page 209 note 1} 1 Aug.–29 Sept. 1307.

^{page 209 note 2} A reference to the abbot-elect shows that the account was not in fact closed before Brother Richard de Kedyngton's election on 26 Jan. 1308 (below, p. 211).

^{page 209 note 3} 1305–6.

^{page 210 note a} de, written over an erasure.

^{page 210 note b} per talliam, interlined.

^{page 210 note c} iiij, written over an erasure.

^{page 210 note d} viij, interlined; ix, struck out.

^{page 210 note e} v d., struck out.

^{page 210 note f} iiij, interlined.

^{page 210 note 1} Probably the farm of Yeoveney for the half-year beginning on 29 Sept. 1307.

^{page 210 note 2} 1306–7.

^{page 210 note 3} The quarter beginning on 29 Sept. 1307.

^{page 211 note g} A short erasure follows.

^{page 211 note h} The last eleven words are interlined; liberat' preposito de Peryford pro quadam mola emenda per Willelmum Merre, struck out. A cross is written in the margin at this point.

^{page 211 note i} per talliam, interlined.

^{page 211 note j} iiij, altered.

^{page 211 note 1} 24 Nov. 1307.

^{page 211 note 2} 3 Dec. 1307.

^{page 211 note 3} 4 Nov. 1307.

^{page 211 note 4} Br. Richard de Kedyngton, alias de Sudbury, was elected abbot of West-minster on 26 Jan. 1308 (Monks, p. 73Google Scholar; Pearce, , Walter de Wenlok, p. 225Google Scholar). He was present at Westminster on the occasion.

^{page 211 note 5} 14 Sept.–21 Dec. 1307.

^{page 212 note a} cum, cum, MS.

^{page 212 note b} The last four words are interlined; de thesauria domini, struck out.

^{page 212 note c} The last three words are interlined; thesauria domini missus, struck out.

^{page 212 note d} quia non recepit, written above Item j cuppa deaurata data marescallo domini regis pro libertate recuperanda per Willelmum Merre, struck out. Three words, of which the first two were de empcione, have been erased above this entry.

^{page 212 note e} Sic in MS.

^{page 212 note 1} Above, p. 204.

^{page 212 note 2} Ibid.

^{page 212 note 3} Edward I was buried in Westminster Abbey on 27 Oct. 1307 (Dictionary of National Biography, vi (London, 1921–1922), p. 456).Google Scholar

^{page 212 note 4} See I. 156, note.

^{page 212 note 5} 17 Dec. 1307.

^{page 212 note 6} Public notary (W.A.M. 5415, 9496).

^{page 213 note f} per aquietanciam, struck out. Merre, irr[otuletur], written later above this entry. 3 in the margin. It is likely that the words Allocator per indenturam ejusdem, written above the next entry, refer in fact to this one. The meaning of these superscriptions is that when the steward of the lands audited the receiver's account he accepted the original indenture between Hegham and the abbot as proof of payment, instead of an acquittance. There are similar entries in the last account (above, p. 201, note).

^{page 213 note g} Item Thome de Amyotesham in perpacationem maritagii neptis domini lx s. per talliam, struck out; the name had been interlined.

^{page 213 note h} This entry was added later.

^{page 213 note i} x li. xiij s. iiij d., struck out.

^{page 213 note 1} The acquittance from Inge is dated at Westminster, 28 Oct. 1307 (W.A.M. 29246).

^{page 213 note 2} Fee for the year beginning at Easter (26 Mar.) 1307.

^{page 213 note 3} Fee for the half-year beginning on 29 Sept. 1307; the acquittance from Gloucester is dated at Westminster, 14 Oct. 1307 (W.A.M. 29244).

^{page 213 note 4} Fee for the year beginning at Easter (26 Mar.) 1307.

^{page 213 note 5} Presumably a fee for the half-year beginning at Easter 1307.

^{page 213 note 6} Above, p. 202, note.

^{page 213 note 7} The third instalment of the septennial tenth of 1305 from the abbot's temporalities in Midd., due on 8 May 1307 (Lunt, , Financial Relations of the Papacy with England, p. 384).Google Scholar

^{page 213 note 8} The same from the abbot's temporalities in Islip.

^{page 213 note 9} The fourth instalment of the same from the abbot's temporalities in Islip, due on 1 Dec. 1307 (ibid.).

^{page 214 note a} This section was inserted later.

^{page 214 note b} Sic in MS.

^{page 214 note c} MS. blank. The sum at the end of the next section includes this loan.

^{page 214 note d} xvj, altered.

^{page 214 note e} xviij., altered.

^{page 214 note f} Principaux, written above.

^{page 214 note g} MS. blank.

^{page 214 note 1} The payments which follow were Queen Eleanor's alms for the period 29 Sept.–29 Dec. 1307.

^{page 214 note 2} This entry suggests that Brother John de Wigorn' became almoner late in 1307.

^{page 214 note 3} Wenlok died on 25 Dec. 1307 at Pyrford and was buried to the south of the high altar at Westminster on 2 Jan. 1308 (Flores Historiarum, iii, p. 140Google Scholar; Flete, p. 119).Google Scholar

^{page 214 note 4} Above, p. 202 and note.