^{page 31 note 1} Reprinted from the Cambridge University Reporter, 23 December 1926. This paper will appear in full in The Numismatic Chronicle 1927.

^{page 33 note 1} Perhaps corrupt. Or the elision may have an influence.

^{page 33 note 2} See Schneider on Callim. L. III, 7 μή μοι φοῑβος ἐρίζῃ.

^{page 33 note 3} ὅκωσπερ is used by Heraclitus. ὥσπερ may introduce a new sentence.

^{page 37 note 1} As noted above this does not actually occur: its non-occurrence may only be a corollary and not a rule.

^{page 37 note 2} With exceptions noted above.

^{page 37 note 3} Once πολλὰ δ' (adv.), twice parts of .

^{page 38 note 1} If per ridiculum we read -ν ὠσὶν, we should have a rhythm (two unconnected nouns) unexampled in tragedy! A late writer of the Christian Era has (A.P. xvi. 52Google Scholar) Ἤλις, Ἄρϓος, Ἄκτιον. I find the phenomenon common in schoolboys' exercises.

^{page 40 note 1} Read χόρτον.

^{page 40 note 2} Who merely chronicle absurd corruptions.

^{page 40 note 3} Hesychius is of immense value in that he glosses almost every other word in Hipponax. But to the metrist his citations of one or two words avail little.

^{page 41 note 1} For trimeters the proportion is seventeen to thirty-five.

^{page 41 note 2} But see below, p. 46.

^{page 42 note 1} There is no proof that Hipponax never wrote whole poems in pure iambi.

^{page 43 note 1} Perhaps μιν = “it,”αὐτόν = “him,” αὐτῇ = “her” in the Ephesian dialect.

^{page 43 note 2} Two resolved feet are incredible, since not even Herodes permits them.