Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:26:41.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long mid vowels in Attic-Ionic and Cretan1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Rupert Thompson
Rupert Thompson
Affiliation:
Selwyn College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

§1. Common Greek inherited from proto-Indo-European a simple five vowel system as shown in (1), with one mid vowel on each of the front and back axes. Only the long vowel system is shown here; the short vowel system had the same structure.

The inherited system was inherently stable: there was balance between the short and long vowel systems and between the front and back axes, and with only one mid vowel on each axis, there was no problem of overcrowding. The individual phonemes were, so far as we can tell, optimally distributed in the available phonological space. (The diagram shows the back axis as being shorter than the front, since anatomical constraints mean there is less articulatory space at the back of the mouth; see Laver (1994)272–3).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 52 , 2006 , pp. 81 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adrados, Francisco Rodríguez (2005) A history of the Greek language: from its origins to the present day, translated by Francisca Rojas del Canto, Leiden and Boston. Originally published as Historia de la lingua griega, Madrid.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aura Jorro, Francesco (1985–1993) Diccionario Micénico, 2 vols., Madrid.Google Scholar
Ahrens, H. L. (1843) De graecae linguae dialectis. Vol. 2. De dialecto dorica. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1959) ‘Some remarks on the structure of Greek vowel systems’, Word 15, 240–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1987) ‘The development of the Attic vowel system: conspiracy or catastrophe?’, in Killen, John T., Melena, José L. and Olivier, Jean-Pierre, (eds.) Studies in Mycenaean and classical Greek presented to John Chadwick, Salamanca [= Minos 20–2], 21–32.Google Scholar
Bartoněk, Antonín (1966) Development of the long-vowel system in ancient Greek dialects, Opera universitatis purkynianae brunensis facultas philosophica 106, Prague.Google Scholar
Bile, Monique (1988) Le dialecte cretois ancien: étude de la langue des inscriptions, recueil des inscriptions posterieures aux IC. Études crétoises 27, Paris.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora (1990) Historical Linguistics (repr.) Cambridge. Original edition 1977.Google Scholar
Chadwick, John (1956a) ‘La représentation des sifflantes en grec mycénien’, in Lejeune, M. (ed.) Études mxcéniennes. Actes du colloque international sur les textes mycéniennes (Gif-sur-Yvette, 3–7 avril 1956). Paris, 83–91.Google Scholar
Chadwick, John (1956b) ‘The Greek dialects and Greek prehistory’, Greece & Rome n.s. 3, 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1968) Dictionnaire etymologique de la lange grecque. Histoire des mots, Paris.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. M. and Cooke, D. (1992) A basic course in statistics (3rd edn.) London, Melbourne and Auckland.Google Scholar
Guarducci, Margherita (1935–1950) Inscriptiones creticae, 4 vols., Rome.Google Scholar
Guarducci, Margherita (1952–1954) ‘Iscrizioni vascolari archaiche da Phaistos,’ Annuario Scuola Atene 30–2, n.s. 14–16, 167–73.Google Scholar
Guarducci, Margherita (1967) Epigrafia greca. Vol. 1. Caratteri e storia delta disciplina. La scrittura greca dalle origini all' età imperiale, Rome.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich (1991) Principles of historical linguistics. (2nd edn., revised and updated) Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey (1997a) Greek. A history of the language and its speakers, London and New York.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey (1997b) ‘Homer's dialect’, in Morris, Ian and Powell, Barry (eds.) A new companion to Homer, Leiden, New York and Cologne, 193–217.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L. H. (1990) The local scripts of archaic Greece, revised edn. with a supplement by Johnson, A. W., Oxford Monographs on Classical Archaeology, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, Lilian H. and Morpurgo-Davies, Anna (1970) ‘Ποινκαστας and πποινικαζϵν: BM 1969. 4–2. I, a new archaic inscription from Crete’, Kadmos 9, 118–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasso de la Vega, J. S. (1956) ‘Sobre la historia de las vocales largas en griego,’ Emerita 24, 261–93.Google Scholar
Laver, John (1994) Principles of phonetics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lejeune, Michel (1958) Mémoires de philologie mycénienne, lère série, Paris.Google Scholar
Lejeune, Michel (1987) (repr.) Phonétique historique du mycénien et du grec ancien, Paris. Original edition 1972.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1955) Économic des changements phonétiques, Berne.Google Scholar
Martin, Peters. (1980) Untersuchungen zur Vertretung der indogermanischen Laryngale im Griechischen, Vienna.Google Scholar
Ruipérez, Martín S. (1956) ‘Esquisse d'une histoire du vocalisme grec’, Word 12, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes (1872) Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen, Weimar.Google Scholar
Andrew, Sihler. (1995) A new comparative grammar of Greek and Latin, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Threatte, Leslie (1980) The grammar of Attic inscriptions. Vol. 1: Phonology, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Ventris, Michael, and Chadwick, John (1973) Documents in Mycenaean Greek (2nd edn.) Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woods, Anthony, Fletcher, Paul and Hughes, Arthur (1986) Statistics in language studies, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar