Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T06:40:33.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First Meeting1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2015

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Lent Term, 1903
Information
Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (First Series) , Volume 64 , 1904 , pp. 1 - 3
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1904

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 3 note 1 Even if Hülsen's latest theory (in Lehmann's Beiträge zur alten Geschichte), that the writing is not all of the same age, were true, the argument would not be affected. But the theory is founded only on the fact that the mason worked sometimes from one side of the stone, sometimes from the other.