Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T03:57:54.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aristarchus or a Sophist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

N. G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Lincoln College, Oxford

Extract

Mr A.G.Lee's acute consideration of my remarks on the maxim (PCPS n.s.21 [1975] 63—4) arrives at an important conclusion. This maxim, one of the basic rules of ancient and, with suitable qualification, modern scholarship, was first formulated in the fifth century B.C. I should be happy to believe that he is right, and that credit for a valuable idea should be given to a sophist whose identity can no longer be ascertained (cf. Dr N.J.Richardson, ibid., 65ff.). My reason for venturing to raise the matter again is a feeling that the premisses of his argument are not quite beyond dispute.

In discussing the anecdote about Agathon Mr Lee says that the use of the verb is surprising, since would be expected. Perhaps I am insensitive to nuance, but I confess to being unable to follow him at this point. ‘To cause to disappear’ seems to me at least as good as ‘to strip’ in the context of the anecdote. Certainly LSJ suggest that the verb is common in several closely related senses in Attic authors of the classical period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)