Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-hl5gf Total loading time: 0.48 Render date: 2023-01-31T05:16:48.249Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Beyond the Hazard Ratio: Generating Expected Durations from the Cox Proportional Hazards Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2017

Abstract

The Cox proportional hazards model is a commonly used method for duration analysis in political science. Typical quantities of interest used to communicate results come from the hazard function (for example, hazard ratios or percentage changes in the hazard rate). These quantities are substantively vague, difficult for many audiences to understand and incongruent with researchers’ substantive focus on duration. We propose methods for computing expected durations and marginal changes in duration for a specified change in a covariate from the Cox model. These duration-based quantities closely match researchers’ theoretical interests and are easily understood by most readers. We demonstrate the substantive improvements in interpretation of Cox model results afforded by the methods with reanalyses of articles from three subfields of political science.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Politics, University of Virginia (email: jkropko@virginia.edu); Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, (email: jeff.harden@nd.edu). Previous versions of this article benefited from presentation at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Athens, GA. We would also like to thank Justin Kirkland, Bruce Desmarais, Meg Shannon, Fred Boehmke, Anand Sokhey, the editor and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Data replication sets and code are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ELT9VD and online appendices at https://doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S000712341700045X.

References

Beck, Nathaniel, and Jackman, Simon. 1998. Beyond Linearity by Default: Generalized Additive Models. American Journal of Political Science 42 (2):596627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Ralf, Augustin, Thomas, and Blettner, Maria. 2005. Generating Survival Times to Simulate Cox Proportional Hazards Models. Statistics in Medicine 24 (11):17131723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2002. Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947–98. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):190199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. 1996. A Dynamic Analysis of the Role of War Chests in Campaign Strategy. American Journal of Political Science 40 (2):352371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Arnold, Laura W., and Zorn, Christopher J. W.. 1997. The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement. American Political Science Review 91 (2):324338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collett, David. 2003. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research, 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Cox, Christopher, Chu, Haitao, Schneider, Michael F., and Munoz, Alvaro. 2007. Parametric Survival Analysis and Taxonomy of Hazard Functions for the Generalized Gamma Distribution. Statistics in Medicine 26 (23):43524374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, David R. 1972. Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society . Series B (Methodological) 34 (2):187220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, David R. 1975. Partial Likelihood. Biometrika 62 (2):269276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, David R., and Oakes, David. 1984. Analysis of Survival Data. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and van Roozendaal, Peter. 1998. The Duration of Cabinet Formation Processes in Western Multi-Party Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 28 (4):609626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2004. Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace After Civil War. International Studies Quarterly 48 (2):269292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanmer, Michael J., and Kalkan, Kerem Ozan. 2013. Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models. American Journal of Political Science 57 (1):263277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2011. A Bootstrap Method for Conducting Statistical Inference with Clustered Data. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11 (2):223246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernan, Miguel A. 2010. The Hazards of Hazard Ratios. Epidemiology 21 (1):1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalbfleisch, John D., and Prentice, Ross L.. 2002. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jonathan N., and Sala, Brian R.. 1996. Careerism, Committee Assignments, and the Electoral Connection. American Political Science Review 90 (1):2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):341355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropko, Jonathan; Harden, Jeffrey J 2017. “Replication Data for: Beyond the Hazard Ratio: Generating Expected Durations from the Cox Proportional Hazards Model”, doi:10.7910/DVN/ELT9VD, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:GaAP2KOYxqS0AjITdz96nw==.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krustev, Valentin L. 2006. Interdependence and the Duration of Militarized Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 43 (3):243260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Aldrich, John H.. 2015. How Political Science Can Better Communicate its Value: 12 Recommendations from the APSA Task Force. PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (S1):119.Google Scholar
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2003. Wasting Time? The Impact of Ideology and Size on Delay in Coalition Formation. British Journal of Political Science 33 (2):323344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Michaela, and Savun, Burcu. 2010. Information, Agreement Design, and the Durability of Civil War Settlements. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2):511524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meernik, James, and Brown, Chelsea. 2007. The Short Path and the Long Road: Explaining the Duration of U.S. Military Operations. Journal of Peace Research 44 (1):6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royston, Patrick, and Parmar, Mahesh K. B.. 2002. Flexible Parametric Proportional-Hazards and Proportional-Odds Models for Censored Survival Data, with Application to Prognostic Modelling and Estimation of Treatment Effects. Statistics in Medicine 21 (15):21752197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipan, Charles R., and Shannon, Megan L.. 2003. Delaying Justice(s): A Duration Analysis of Supreme Court Confirmation. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4):654668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uno, Hajime, Brian Claggett, Lu Tian, Eisuke Inoue, Paul Gallo, Toshio Miyata, Deborah Schrag, Masahiro Takeuchi, Yoshiaki Uyama, Lihui Zhao, Hicham Skali, Scott Solomon, Susanna Jacobus, Michael Hughes, Milton Packer, and Lee-Jen Wei. 2014. Moving Beyond the Hazard Ratio in Quantifying the Between-Group Difference in Survival Analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology 32 (22):23802385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, Simon N. 2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Simon N. 2011. Fast Stable Restricted Maximum Likelihood and Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 73 (1):336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Kropko and Harden Supplementary Material

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Kropko and Harden supplementary material

Kropko and Harden supplementary material 1

Download Kropko and Harden supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 259 KB
10
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Beyond the Hazard Ratio: Generating Expected Durations from the Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Beyond the Hazard Ratio: Generating Expected Durations from the Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Beyond the Hazard Ratio: Generating Expected Durations from the Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *