Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T04:33:31.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Architecture of Parliaments: Legislative Houses and Political Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Charles T. Goodsell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The architecture of houses of parliament and of legislative chambers in countries around the world is analysed for its relationship to political culture. It is argued that parliamentary buildings and spaces (1) preserve cultural values of the polity over time; (2) articulate contemporaneous political attitudes and values; and (3) contribute to the formation of political culture. Preservation is illustrated by how parliament buildings occupy sacred sites, symbolize the state and assure the continuity of legislative traditions. Articulation is exemplified by reflecting the relative importance of the two legislative houses and making expressive statements about the role of parties, executives and individual legislators. Formation can be affected by the physical dimensions of chambers, the arrangement of seats, aisles and lecterns, and spatial relationships between houses and the parliament versus the executive. It is concluded that the advent of television broadcasting of parliamentary sessions may make these architectural features even more important in perpetuating, manifesting and shaping political culture.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 287 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goodsell, Charles T., The Social Meaning of Civic Space: Studying Political Authority Through Architecture (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988), pp. 7–10.Google Scholar

2 Lasswell, Harold D., The Signature of Power: Buildings, Communication, and Policy (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1979).Google Scholar

3 Milne, David, ‘Architecture, Politics and the Public Realm’, Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 5 (1981), 131–46.Google Scholar

4 Patterson, Samuel C., ‘Party Opposition in the Legislature: The Ecology of Legislative Institutionalization’, Polity, 4 (1972), 344–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Koehler, Cortus T., ‘City Council Chamber Design: The Impact of Interior Design Upon the Meeting Process’, Journal of Environmental Systems, 10 (1980), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Bonta, Juan Pablo, Architecture and Its Interpretation: A Study of Expressive Systems in Architecture (London: Lord Humphries, 1979).Google Scholar

7 Canter, David, The Psychology of Place (New York: St Martin's Press, 1977).Google Scholar

8 Rapoport, Amos, Human Aspects of Urban Form (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977Google Scholar, and The Meaning of the Built Environment (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1982).Google Scholar

9 Lerup, Lars, Building the Unfinished: Architecture and Human Action (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1977).Google Scholar

10 The Austrian Parliament (Vienna: Osterreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1975), p. 22.Google Scholar

11 Shipley, W. Ivor, ‘The Parliament Building of Malaysia’, Journal of the Parliaments of the Commonwealth, 46 (1965), 177–81.Google Scholar

12 Meyers, A. R., Parliaments and Estates in Europe to 1789 (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975).Google Scholar

13 Gooch, R. K., Parliamentary Government in France: Revolutionary Origins, 1789–1791 (New York: Russell and Russell, 1960)Google Scholar. Laponce, J. A., Left and Right: The Topography of Political Perceptions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981).Google Scholar

14 Herman, Valentine, Parliaments of the World: A Reference Compendium (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1976), pp. 260–66.Google Scholar

15 Paul Goodman suggests that the Senators' separate desks portray them as a kind of state ambassador. (Utopian Essays and Practical Proposals (New York: Random House, 1952), pp. 171–72.)Google Scholar

16 Harbeson, John F., ‘The National Legislative Chambers’, Journal of the American Institute of Architects, 18 (1952), 2559–64.Google Scholar

17 Barker, Roger G., Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behaviour (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

18 Black, John W., ‘The Effect of Room Characteristics Upon Vocal Intensity and Rate’, Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 22 (1961), 174–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 James, Robert R., ed., Winston S. Churchill, His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963 (New York: Chelsea House, 1974), Vol. VII, pp. 6869–73.Google Scholar

20 Peschel, Kurt, ‘Council Chambers of the Great Parliaments’, Parliamentary Affairs, 14 (1961), 518–33, p. 526.Google Scholar

21 Osmond, Humphrey, ‘Function as the Basis of Psychiatric Ward Design’, Mental Hospital, 8 (1957), 23–9.Google Scholar

22 Pullicino, Philip, ‘The Parliament House of Uganda’, The Parliamentarian, 45 (1964), 390–4.Google Scholar

23 Sheppard, Fergus C. F., ‘Parliamentary Buildings, Wellington, New Zealand’, The Parliamentarian, 47 (1966), 207–8.Google Scholar

24 Fewtrell, Terry, ‘A New Parliament House: A New Parliamentary Order’, unpublished, 1984.Google Scholar

25 Garay, Ronald, Congressional Television (Boulder, Colorado: Greenwood Press, 1984).Google Scholar