Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T15:53:56.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urease (EC 3.5.1.5) inhibition in the sheep rumen and its effect on urea and nitrogen metabolism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

F. G. Whitelaw ,
J. S. Milne  and
Shelley A. Wright
F. G. Whitelaw
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. S. Milne
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Shelley A. Wright
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The urease (EC 3.5.1.5) inhibitor, phenylphosphoryldiamidate (PPDA), was given by continuous infusion into the rumen of two sheep nourished by intragastric infusion and into either the rumen or abomasum of four sheep given a pelleted diet containing 119 g crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25)/kg dry matter. PPDA was given at 1 g/d in infusion sheep and 1.5 g/d in the normally-fed sheep. Measurements of urea kinetics were made using single injections of [14Clurea. Urease inhibition was complete within 24 h of starting PPDA infusions to the rumen; in this time-period, urea concentration in rumen contents reached equilibrium with that in plasma and this situation persisted until infusions were terminated. Relative to the control periods, plasma urea and rumen ammonia concentrations were unchanged but urea irreversible loss rate decreased by 26% in infusion sheep and 33% in fed sheep when PPDA was given. Urinary urea excretion was not affected, hence urea degradation, measured by difference, decreased by 77 and 58% respectively in response to urease inhibition. Administration of PPDA to the abomasum resulted in a reduction in rumen urease activity to about 40% of control values but had no effect on urea metabolism. Differences between treatments in daily nitrogen retention were not significant, indicating that under the dietary conditions imposed in these experiments, even substantial changes in urea recycling had only minor effects on the overall N economy of the animal.

Keywords

RuminantUreaUreaseKinetics
Type
Nitrogen Metabolism
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , September 1991 , pp. 209 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1991

References

REFERENCES

Abdel Rahman, S. & Decker, P. (1966). Comparative study of the urease in the rumen wall and rumen content. Nature 209, 618–619.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, Suppl. No. 1. Farnham Royal, Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Ash, R. W. & Dobson, A. (1963). The effect of absorption on the acidity of rumen contents. Journal of Physiology 169, 39–61.Google Scholar
Austin, E. R., Bradford, T. J. & Lupin, M. S. (1984). High performance liquid chromatographic determination and hydrolysis studies of phenyl phosphorodiamidate, a urease inhibitor. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 32, 1090–1096.Google Scholar
Byrnes, B. H., Savant, N. K. & Crasswell, E. T. (1983). Effect of a urease inhibitor phenyl phosphorodiamidate on the efficiency of urea applied to rice. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47, 270–274.Google Scholar
Cheng, K. -J., McCowan, R. P. & Costerton, J. W. (1979). Adherent epithelial bacteria in ruminants and their roles in digestive tract function. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 139–148.Google Scholar
Cheng, K. -J. & Wallace, R. J. (1979). The mechanism of passage of endogenous urea through the rumen wall and the role of ureolytic epithelial bacteria in the urea flux. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinsdale, D., Cheng, K. -J., Wallace, R. J. & Goodlad, R. A. (1980). Digestion of epithelial tissue of the rumen wall by adherent bacteria in infused and conventionally fed sheep. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 39, 1059–1066.Google Scholar
Dixon, N. E., Gazzola, C., Watters, J. J., Blakely, R. L. & Zerner, B. (1975). Inhibition of Jack Bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5) by acetohydroxamic acid and by phosphoramidate. An equivalent weight for urease. Journal of the American Chemical Society 97, 4130–4131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, A. R., Boda, K. & Varady, J. (1986). Regulation of nitrogen metabolism and recycling. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 386–402 [Milligan, L. P.Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Genstat, (1987). Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Houpt, T. R. (1970). Transfer of urea and ammonia to the rumen. In, Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 119–131 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Houpt, T. R. & Houpt, K. A. (1968). Transfer of urea nitrogen across the rumen wall. American Journal of Physiology 214, 1296–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, G. A. & Milligan, J. D. (1975). Influence on some rumen and blood parameters of feeding acetohydroxamic acid in a urea-containing ration for lambs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 55, 39–47.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1980). The degradation and utilization of endogenous urea in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 205–221.Google Scholar
Liao, C. F. -H. & Raines, S. G. (1985). Inhibition of soil urease activity by amido derivatives of phosphoric and thiophosphoric acids. Plant and Soil 85, 149–152.Google Scholar
McCowan, R. P., Cheng, K. J., Bailey, C. B. M. & Costerton, J. W. (1978). Adhesion of bacteria to epithelial cell surfaces within the reticulo-rumen of cattle. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 35, 149–155.Google Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Miller, H. (1965). Automated and manual direct methods for the determination of blood urea. Clinical Chemistry 11, 624–627.Google Scholar
Martens, D. A. & Bremner, J. M. (1984). Urea hydrolysis in soils: factors influencing the effectiveness of phenylphosphorodiamidate as retardent. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 16, 515–519.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1974). Isotope techniques for studying the dynamics of nitrogen metabolism in ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 33, 1–8.Google Scholar
Norton, B. W., Janes, A. N. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). The effect of intraruminal infusions of sodium bicarbonate, ammonium chloride and sodium butyrate on urea metabolism in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 265–274.Google Scholar
Oncuer, A., Milne, J. S. & Whitelaw, F. G. (1990). The effect of a hind-gut fermentation on urea metabolism in sheep nourished by intragastric infusion. Experimental Physiology 75, 689–700.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Wenham, G. & Corrigall, W. (1979). The sustenance of growing and fattening ruminants by intragastric infusion of volatile fatty acids and protein. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 553–558.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W., Holland, S. M., Tait, C. A. G. & Lee, N. H. (1983). The feeding value of ruminants of straw and whole crop barley and oats treated with anhydrous or aqueous ammonia or urea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 8, 247–257.Google Scholar
Piatkowski, B. & Voigt, J. (1981). Investigations of the effect of phosphoric phenyl ester diamide as inhibitor of the rumen urease of dairy cows. 4. Feed intake and milk yield. Archives Tierernährung 31, 181–185.Google Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1980). Maximum Likelihood Programme, Version 3.07. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Streeter, C. L., Oltjen, R. R., Slyter, L. L. & Fishbein, W. N. (1969). Urea utilization in wethers receiving the urease inhibitor, acetohydroxamic acid. Journal of Animal Science 29, 88–93.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. F. (1970). Urea excretion in ruminants. II. Studies in sheep whose rumen contents were replaced with physiological saline. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 337–344.Google Scholar
Vlek, P. L. G., Stumpe, J. M. & Byrnes, B. H. (1980). Urease activity and inhibition in flooded soil systems. Fertilizer Research 1, 191–202.Google Scholar
Voigt, J., Piatkowski, B. & Bock, J. (1980). Investigations of the effect of phosphoric phenyl ester diamide as inhibitor of the rumen urease of dairy cows. 1. Influence on urea hydrolysis, ammonia release and fermentation in the rumen. Archives Tierernährung 30, 811–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G. & Milne, J. S. (1991). Urea degradation in sheep nourished by intragastric infusion: effects of level and nature of energy inputs. Experimental Physiology. 76, 77–90.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Milne, J. S. & Chen, X. B. (1991). The effect of a rumen microbial fermentation on urea and nitrogen metabolism of sheep nourished by intragastric infusion. Experimental Physiology. 76, 91–101.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Milne, J. S., Ørskov, E. R., Stansfield, R. & Franklin, M. (1990). Urea metabolism in sheep given conventional feeds or nourished by intragastric infusion. Experimental Physiology 75, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed