Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T08:35:03.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of the toxicity of copper to pigs

2.* Effect of protein source and other dietary components on the response to high and moderate intakes of copper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. F. Suttle  and
C. F. Mills
N. F. Suttle
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
C. F. Mills
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Six groups of three (Expt 1) or four (Expt 2) female litter-mate Large White pigs were allocated after weaning to three or four treatments in a randomized block design. 2. In Expt 1, 600ppm copper were added to diets based on maize meal and containing either soya-bean meal, dried skim milk or white-fish meal to provide 16% total crude protein. Severity of Cu toxicosis was assessed by estimating aspartate transaminase (AST) activity in serum, Cu levels in serum and liver, haemoglobin concentration and the incidence of jaundice. 3. Toxicosis was severe only in pigs receiving white-fish meal, but liver Cu and haemoglobin levels were similar in all groups. 4. In Expt 2, 0, 250 or 425 ppm Cu or 425 ppm Cu+150 ppm zinc+150 ppm iron were added to the maize-white-fish meal diet from which the normal Zn and Fe supplements were omitted, creating optimal conditions for development of Cu toxicosis. 5. In the absence of Zn and Fe supplements, 425 ppm Cu caused the development of a severe toxicosis. Simultaneous addition of Zn and Fe supplements eliminated all signs of toxicosis. 6. Under the same conditions 250 ppm Cu caused a mild toxicosis and also exaggerated the slight signs of parakeratosis or Zn deficiency noted in control animals. 7. High calcium levels of 1.7% in a basal diet containing 30 ppm Zn probably induced a marginal Zn deficiency which favoured the development of Cu toxicosis. Differences in calcium level were probably responsible for the apparent effects of the different protein supplements in Expt 1. 8. Occasional occurrences of toxicity in pigs given 250 ppm Cu as a growth stimulant may be partly due to the use of diets low in Zn and Fe and high in calcium. Correcting these factors would extend the safety of Cu supplementation of the commercial diets.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , May 1966 , pp. 149 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Bellis, D. B. (1961). Anim. Prod. 3, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellis, D. B. & Philp, J. McL. (1957). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 8, Suppl. p. 119.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Townsend, J. M., Harrington, C. & Rowell, J. G. (1962). J. agric. Sci., Camb., 58, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dammers, J. & Stolk, K. (1959). Versl. landbouwk. Onderz. Ned. 65. 12, 1.Google Scholar
Davis, P. N., Norris, J. C. & Kratzer, F. H. (1962). J. Nutr. 77, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, K. M., Ely, R. E. & Huffman, C. F. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, V. J., Iles, R. D., Slowitsky, Z. & Brocksopp, R. E. (1961). J. agric. Sci., Camb., 56, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, R. M. & Yohe, M. (1960). J. Nutr. 70, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forshaw, R. P. (1961). Proc. Can. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 32.Google Scholar
Gray, L. F. & Daniel, L. J. (1954). J. Nutr. 53, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggenheim, K. (1964). Blood, 23, 786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard, S. L., Butler, W. O., Comar, C. L. & Hobbs, C. S. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. A. & Dishington, I. W. (1960). Medlemsblad för den Norske Veterinaerforening, no. 1, p. 3.Google Scholar
Hoefer, J. A., Miller, E. R., Ullrey, D. E., Ritchie, H. D. & Luecke, R. W. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, W. G., Lewis, P. K. Jr, Phillips, P. H. & Grummer, R. H. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hove, E., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1938). Am. J. Physiol. 124, 750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernkamp, H. C. H. & Ferrin, E. F. (1953). J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 123, 217.Google Scholar
Kirchgessner, M. & Weser, U. (1963). Z. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 18, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, R. M., Turk, D. E., Zeigler, T. R. & Norris, L. C. (1962). Poult. Sci. 41, 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P. K. Jr, Grummer, R. H. & Hoekstra, W. G. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 627.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. K. Jr, Hoekstra, W. G. & Grummer, R. H. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., Livingstone, R. M. & McDonald, I. (1961). Anim. Prod. 3, 111.Google Scholar
McCall, J. T., Mason, J. V. & Davis, G. K. (1961). J. Nutr. 74, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Månsson, I., Askling, M. & Manheim, F. (1964). Acta wet. scand. 5, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberleas, D., Muhrer, M. E. & O'Dell, B. L. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dell, B. L. & Savage, J. E. (1960). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 103, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hara, P. J., Newman, A. P. & Jackson, R. (1960). Aust. vet. J. 36, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, E. A., Smith, W. H., Stob, M. & Beeson, W. M. (1964). J. Nutr. 82, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, H. D., Luecke, R. W., Baltzer, B. V., Miller, E. R., Ullrey, D. E. & Hoefer, J. A. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 1010.Google Scholar
Ritchie, H. D., Luecke, R. W., Baltzer, B. V., Miller, E. R., Ullrey, D. E. & Hoefer, J. A. (1963). J. Nutr. 79, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. H., Plumlee, M. P. & Beeson, W. M. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J. W. & Earle, I. P. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, N. F. (1964). Dietary factors affecting copper toxicosis in the pig. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Suttle, N. F. & Mills, C. F. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, H. F. & Salmon, W. D. (1955). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 88, 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, H. D., McCall, J. T., Bass, B. & Combs, G. E. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeigler, T. R., Leach, R. M. Jr, Scott, M. L., Huegin, F., McEvoy, R. K. & Strain, H. (1964). J. Nutr. 82, 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar