Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T03:36:07.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rumen development in the calf

1. The effect of diets containing different proportions of concentrates to hay on rumen development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

I. J. F. Stobo
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
J. H. B. Roy
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Helen J. Gaston
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Thirty Ayrshire bull calves were used in an experiment to study the effects of diets containing different proportions of concentrates to hay on rumen development at 12 weeks of age. In addition, six milk-fed calves were slaughtered at 3 weeks of age for comparison. 2. Restriction of the maximum daily allowance of concentrates to the lower levels was accompanied by an increase in the voluntary intake of hay, but the performance of calves from 3 to 12 weeks of age was significantly better in calves given the high-concentrate diets. 3. The weight of contents of the reticulo-rumen increased from 0.7 kg at 3 weeks of age in the milk-fed calf to 7.7 kg and 10.9 kg at 12 weeks in calves given the high-concentrate and high-roughage diets respectively. Between 68 and 79% of the total contents of the alimentary tract was contained in the reticulo-rumen of the ruminant calf. The weight of contents of the omasum was significantly greater in calves given 1.36 kg concentrates/day than in those given either 0.45 or 2.27 kg concentrates/day. Equations were developed from the results by which the weight of contents of the various parts of the alimentary tract, and hence empty body weight in the live animal, can be determined from a knowledge of the live weight and daily consumption of concentrates and hay, 4. Volume displacement of the reticulo-rumen tended to increase with increase in the proportion of hay in the diet. The volume displacement of the omasum increased in response to concentrate intake up to a maximum of 1.36 kg/day and thereafter declined, but the nature of the diet had no significant effect on the volume displacement of the abomasum. 5. Calves given the high-concentrate diets had a significantly greater weight of reticulo-rumen tissue at 12 weeks than those given the high-roughage diets. 6. Whereas the thickness of the muscular wall of the rumen did not differ significantly between treatments, there was an increase in the length and density of papillas, particularly in the anterior dorsal and ventral sacs of the rumen, as the intake of concentrates was increased. The results show the marked relationship between the performance of the animal and an advanced stage of development of the rumen papillas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, D. G., Blaxter, K. L. & Graham, N. McC. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzie, D. & Phillipson, A. T. (1957). The Alimentary Tract of the Ruminant. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Hutcheson, M. K., Robertson, J. M. & Wilson, A. L. (1952). Br. J. Nutr. 6, i.Google Scholar
Brownlee, A. (1956). Br. vet. J. 112, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, E. J. & Hungate, R. E. (1954). Appl. Microbiol. 2, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1956). J. Physiol., Lond., 133, 76P.Google Scholar
Flatt, W. P., Warner, R. G. & Loosli, J. K. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatt, W. P., Warner, R. G. & Loosli, J. K. (1959). Mem. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn no. 361.Google Scholar
Freer, M. & Campling, R. C. (1963). Br. J. Nutr. 17, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, H. N. & Warner, R. G. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1178.Google Scholar
Kesler, E. M., Ronning, M. & Knodt, C. B. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 110, 969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. P., Arnold, P. T. D. & Becker, R. B. (1950). J. Dairy Sci. 33, 379.Google Scholar
Paloheimo, L. & Mäkelä, A. (1959). Suom. maatal. Seur. Julk. 94, 15.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. (1956 a). Agriculture, Lond, 62, 462.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. (1956 b). Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1956). Studies in calf nutrition with special reference to the protective action of colostrum. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Gaston, H. J., Shillam, K. W. G., Thompson, S. Y., Stobo, I. J. F. & Greatorex, J. C. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Shillam, K. W. G., Hawkins, G. M. & Lang, J. M. (1958). Br. J. Nutr. 12, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, E. G., Warner, R. G., Harrison, H. N. & Loosli, J. K. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillam, K. W. G. (1960). Studies on the nutrition of the young calf with special referknce to the incidence of Escherichia coli infections. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., McGilliard, A. D. & Jacobson, N. L. (1963). J. Dairy Sci. 46, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamate, H., McGilliard, A. D., Jacobson, N. L. & Getty, R. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. G., Flatt, W. P. & Loosli, J. K. (1956). J. agric. Fd Chem. 4, 788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar