Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T09:24:54.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The rumen buffering system of sheep fed pelleted roughage–concentrate rations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Bijan Emmanuel
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Biochemistry Department, The Agricultural Institute, Duminea, Castleknock, Co. Dublin
M. J. Lawlor
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Biochemistry Department, The Agricultural Institute, Duminea, Castleknock, Co. Dublin
D. M. Mcaleese
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Biochemistry Department, The Agricultural Institute, Duminea, Castleknock, Co. Dublin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Three wethers fitted with permanent rumen cannulas were given a pelleted roughage–concentrate ration containing 45% ground barley straw as roughage. The animals were given 1 kg of the diet at 08.00 h and 500 g at 17.00 h.

2. The measurements made to determine the buffering components of the rumen fluid were: rumen pH, buffering capacity value (β), total volatile fatty acids (VFA), CO2 and inorganic phosphorus concentrations. β was expressed as the quantity of titrant (m-equiv./l.) required to bring about 2 unit changes in rumen fluid pH. The pH ranges in which the β values were measured were 4–6, 5–7 and 6–8. All measurements were made at hourly intervals over a 9 h period commencing 1 h before feeding.

3. Rumen pH values were high before feeding, decreased to a minimum 2 h after feeding and then increased to approximately the original values. The concentrations of total VFA followed an inverse pattern. There was diurnal variation in the concentrations of CO2 but inorganic P levels varied very little throughout the day.

4. Significant correlations were obtained between VFA, inorganic P and CO2 levels and the β values. It would appear that the bicarbonate and phosphate buffers were not effective in regulating the rumen pH when sheep were given a roughage–concentrate ration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1969

References

Bailey, C. B. (1961). Br. J. Nutr. 15, 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1958). Br. J. Nutr. 12, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Br. J. Nutr. 11, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabezas, M. T., Hentges, J. F. Jr & Ammerman, C. B. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 303.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H., Huffman, C. F., Kleiber, M., Olson, T. M. & Schalk, A. F. (1945). J. Anim. Sci. 4, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1950). Microduffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error, 3rd ed. p. 208.Google Scholar
Cullison, A. E. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, Y. (1925). J. biol. Chem. 66, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1960). J. Physiol., Lond. 150, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, M. J., Giesecke, D. & Walser-Kärst, K. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G., Cunningham, H. M. & Friend, D. W. (1962). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 42, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G., Cunningham, H. M. & Friend, D. W. (1963). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 43, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, N. S., Burroughs, W. & Woods, W. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomas, F. M., Moir, R. J. & Somers, M. (1967). Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. W. & Hodgetts, V. E. (1955 a). Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. W. & Hodgetts, V. E. (1955 b). Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 124.Google Scholar
Van Adrichem, P. W. M. (1962). De Invloed Van Het Voeder Op Enige Fermentatierprodukten in de Pens Van Normale Runderen en Van Acetonaemiepatienten, p. 33. Drukkerij Stempel, Hoorn.Google Scholar