Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T09:33:16.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relation between food intake and abomasal emptying and small intestinal transit time in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

P. C. Gregory ,
S. J. Miller  and
A. C. Brewer
P. C. Gregory
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
S. J. Miller
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
A. C. Brewer
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The relation between the level of food intake and gastrointestinal motility and digesta flow in the abomasum and small intestine was studied in sheep fitted with nichrome-wire electrodes in the gut wall, an abomasal and a duodenal catheter and a terminal ileal cannula.

2. Abomasal volume and outflow were calculated from CrEDTA dilution in six sheep and small intestinal transit time by the passage of Phenol Red in ten sheep.

3. The frequency of the migrating myoelectric complex of the small intestine was not altered by the level of food intake but the duration of the periods of irregular spiking activity, the amplitude of abomasal activity and the frequency of duodenal rushes were decreased as the level of food intake was decreased.

4. There was a linear relation between the level of food intake (FI) and abomasal outflow (mean with SEM: 327 (69) ml/h for each kg FI/d; P < 0.01), and abomasal volume (mean with SEM: 344 (50) ml/kg FI per d; P < 0.001), without any significant change in the half-time of marker dilution in the abomasum. Small intestinal transit time decreased with an increase in food intake (mean with SEM: - 54.9 (5.6) min/kg FI per d; P < 0.001).

5.It is concluded that abomasal volume and the rate of digesta flow from the abomasum and along the small intestine are linearly related to the level of food intake.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 373 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

Alwash, A. H. & Thomas, P. C. (1971). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreiro, M. A., McKenna, R. D. & Beck, I. T. (1968). American Journal of Digestive Diseases 13, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnerts, W. T., van't Klooster, A. T. & Frens, A. M. (1968). Veterinary Record 82, 47.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). British Journal of Nutrition 10, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, L. (1977). Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie 171, 959–964.Google Scholar
Bueno, L., Fioramonti, J. & Ruckebusch, Y. (1975). Journal of Physiology 249, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, J. B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). British Journal of Nutrition 19, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C. & Journet, M. (1967). Annales de Zootechnie 16, 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). British Journal of Nutrition 18, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Griffiths, D. A. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. C. (1982). Journal of Physiology 328, 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, P. C. & Wenham, G. (1984). Gut. 25, A1321–A1322.Google Scholar
Grivel, M. L. & Ruckebusch, Y. (1972). Journal of Physiology 227, 611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Hecker, J. F. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 30, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973 a).British Journal of Nutrition 29, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973 b). British Journal of Nutrition 30, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, F. A. & Hill, K. J. (1962). Journal of Physiology 162, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. (1964). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, S. (1961). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, p. 35 [Lewis, D., editor]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. & Holmes, W. (1969). Animal Production 11, 11–18.Google Scholar
Poncet, C., Dimova, E., Leveille, M. & Dardillat, C. (1977). Annales de Biologie Animale Biochimie Biophysique 17, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckebuscb, Y. & Bueno, L. (1977). American Journal of Physiology 233, E483–E487.Google Scholar
Shellenberger, P. R. & Kesler, E. M. (1961). Journal of Animal Science 20, 416–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Smith, J. S. & Dewey, P. J. S. (1975). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. & Stacy, B. D. (1968). British Journal of Nutrition 22, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenham, G. & Wyburn, R. S. (1980). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar