Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T02:48:14.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Passage rate and total clearance rate from the rumen of cows fed on grass silages differing in cell-wall content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Marlou W. Bosch
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural University, Haagsteeg 4, NL 6708 PM Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Human and Animal Physiology, Agricultural University, Haarweg 10, NL 6709 PJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
Marianne Bruining
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural University, Haagsteeg 4, NL 6708 PM Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Four non-lactating, rumen-fistulated cows were fed ad lib. on two grass silages (first cut (FC) and second cut (SC)) harvested at different growth stages, resulting in different crude-protein (CP) and neutral-detergent-fibre (NDF) contents (FC, 152 g CP/kg, 515g NDF/kg and SC, 210 g CP/kg, 442 g NDF/kg). Voluntary intake and rumen contents, total as well as organic matter were higher for silage FC. Fractional passage rate from the rumen, calculated from the logarithmic decline in Cr-NDF rumen pool, was higher for silage FC (0·0395/h and 0·0446/h for silages SC and FC respectively). When fractional passage rates from the rumen were calculated by dividing the intake of indigestible organic matter by the mean rumen poo! of this fraction, the same differences between silages were found, although the actual levels were much lower (0·0258$sol;h and 0·0300/h for silages SC and FC respectively). The results from the present experiment suggest that disappearance rate from the rumen of particles with a size between 1·25 and 0·071 mm is the rate-limiting step in the control of rumen fill.

Type
Digesta kinetics and feed intake in silage-fed animals
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1995

References

REFERENCE

Bosch, M. W., Janssen, I. M., van Bruchem, J., Boer, H. & Hof, G. (1988) Digestion of alfalfa and grass silages in sheep. 1. Rates of fermentation in and passage from the reticulorumen. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 36, 175185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, M. W., Lammers-Wienhoven, S. C. W., Bangma, G. A., Boer, H. & van Adrichem, P. W. M. (1992). Influence of, stage of, maturity of, grass silages on, digestion processes in, dairy cows. 2. Rumen, contents, passage, rates, distribution of, rumen and, faecal particles and mastication activity. Livestock Production Science 32, 265281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruining, M. & Bosch, M. W. (1992) Ruminal passage rate as affected by Cr-NDF particle size. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37, 193200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1986) The kinetics of particulate matter in the rumen. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants. Proceedings of the VIth International Symposium on Rumen Physiology, pp. 173195 [Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A., editors]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gasa, J., Holtenius, K., Sutton, J. D., Dhanoa, M. S. & Napper, D. J. (1991) Rumen fill and digesta kinetics in lactating Friesian cows given two levels of concentrates with two types of grass silage ad lib. British Journal of Nutrition 66,381398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goering, H. K. & van Soest, P. J. (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses. Agricultural Handbook no. 379. Washington D. C.: ARS, USDA.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Poppi, D. P. (1984) Critical particle size in sheep and cattle. Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants. Canadian Society of Animal Science, Occasional Publication no. 1, p. 170 [Kennedy, P. M., editor]. Edmonton: Canadian Society of Animal Science.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. (1987) Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function. Journal of Animal Science 64, 15481558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penning, P. D. & Johnson, R. H. (1983) The use of internal markers to estimate herbage digestibility and intake. 2. Indigestible acid-detergent fibre. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 133138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Norton, B. W., Minson, D. J. & Hendricksen, R. E. (1980);.The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 275280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. L., Jung, G. A. & Thayne, W. V. (1988) Relationships between nutritive quality and fiber components of cool season and warm season forages: a retrospective study. Journal of Animal Science 66, 12751291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P. H., Tamminga, S. & van Vuuren, A. M. (1987) Influence of declining level of feed intake and varying the proportion of starch in the concentrate on rumen ingesta quantity, composition and kinetics of ingesta turnover in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 17, 3162.Google Scholar
SPSS, Inc. (1988) SPSS/PC+ Base Manual. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Sutherland, T. M. (1987) Particle separation in the forestomachs of sheep. In Aspects of Digestive Physiology in Ruminants, pp. 4373 [Dobson, A., editor]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S., Robinson, P. H., Vogt, M. & Boer, H. (1989) Rumen ingesta kinetics of cell wall components in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 25, 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, P., Colluci, P. E. & Van Soest, P. J. (1980) Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J. (1982) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Corvallis, OR:; O&B Books Inc.Google Scholar
Varian (1987) Operation Manual SpectrAA 300/400, Publication no. 85–100697–00.Google Scholar