Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:04:30.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nitrogen-sparing effect of methionine sulphoxide and some other sulphur-containing amino acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

L. R. Njaa  and
A. Aksnes
L. R. Njaa
Affiliation:
Government Vitamin Institute, Directorate of Fisheries, 5013 Bergen, Norway
A. Aksnes
Affiliation:
Government Vitamin Institute, Directorate of Fisheries, 5013 Bergen, Norway
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The nitrogen-sparing effect of methionine, methionine sulphoxide, homocystme, cystine and choline was studied in rats by determining daily N excretions during 5 d after changing from a high-protein diet to a protein-free diet, L-glutamic acid was used as a negative control.

2. L-, D- and DL-methionine were equally active in sparing N. L-methionine sulphoxide, DL-homocystine and L-cystine were as active as L-methionine. D-methionine sulphoxide was slightly less active than L-methionine sulphoxide, Choline hydrogen tartrate was not different from the negative control.

3. It is concluded that in short-term experiments cystine is the key substance in the N-sparing effect.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , November 1982 , pp. 565 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

REFERENCES

Allison, J. B., Anderson, J. A. & Seeley, R. D. (1947). J. Nutr. 33, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, M., William, W. & Swanson, P. P. (1947). J. Nutr. 33, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooke, W. W. & Simpson, W. E. (1971). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 22, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, J. J. (1970). S. Afr. med. J. 44, 336.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, J. D., Martin, J. J., Kyle, W. E. & Harris, B. J. (1980). Proc. Soc. expl. biol. Med. 164, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjøen, A. U. & Njaa, L. R. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 37, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, C., Swanson, P. & Stewart, H. M. (1949). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 8, 386.Google Scholar
Lubaszewska, S., Pastuszewska, B. & Kielanowski, J. (1973). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 31, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. L. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 152, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudd, S. H. (1980). Ciba Fdn Symp. no. 72, p. 239.Google Scholar
Muramatsu, T. & Okumura, J-I. (1980). J. Nutr. 110, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E. K., Gerber, L. P. & Corly, R. C. (1939). Am. J. Physiol. 126, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njaa, L. R. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njaa, L. R. (1963). Rep. Tech. Res. Norwegian Fish Ind. no. 5, p. 118.Google Scholar
Potts, T. J. (1967). J. Ass. Off. analyt. Chem. 50, 56.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, ch. 12, 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Yoshida, A. & Moritoki, K. (1974). Nutr. Rep. int. 9, 159.Google Scholar