Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T13:28:47.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methane production in the rumen and lower gut of sheep given lucerne chaff: effect of level of intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

R. M. Murray ,
A. M. Bryant  and
R. A. Leng
R. M. Murray
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia
A. M. Bryant
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia
R. A. Leng
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Methane production rates were estimated simultaneously in the rumen and caecum of sheep given 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 g lucerne (Medicago sativa) chaff/d using isotope dilution techniques. Estimates were also made of volatile fatty acid (VFA) production in the rumen at each level of feeding. In all studies three to four animals were used at each level of intake.

2. Production of VFA and of methane were both related to digestible energy (de) intake. Regression lines for both VFA production and methane production v.de intake had significant intercepts indicating an input of endogenous, fermentable organic matter into the rumen in excess of 50 g/d.

3. The values obtained for rates of methane production were compared with those calculated from stoicheiometric equations relating rates of methane and VFA production. Comparisons of methane production with that predicted from de intake were also made.

4. Balances for digestion of food determined for the rumen indicated that the energies in the end-products were more than 100% of the de intakes at low intakes of lucerne chaff. Correction for fermentation of apparent endogenous materials resulted in more realistic values. Endogenous materials appeared to make a significant contribution to VFA and methane production, particularly at low levels of intake.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , March 1978 , pp. 337 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

REFERENCES

Baldwin, R. L., Lucas, H. L. & Cabrera, R. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 319 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Coelho, da, Silva, J. F., Prescott, J. H. D. & Armstrong, D. G. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1961). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 10, p. 211.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeyer, D., Henderickx, H. & Van Nevel, C. (1972). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31, 54A.Google Scholar
Demeyer, D. I. & Van Nevel, D. J. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 366 [McDonald, I. W., Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale: University of New England Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 474 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1960). Bact. Rev. 24, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1968). In Handbook of Physiology. Section 6. Alimentary Canal, Vol. 5, ch. 130, p. 2725 [Code, C. F., Heidel, W., editors]. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 406 [A. T. Phillipson, editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. (1974). In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage, Vol. 3, p. 81 [Bailey, R. W., Butler, G. W., editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. & Leonard, G. J. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, J. M. & Armstrong, D. G. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. M., Bryant, A. M. & Leng, R. A. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 36, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C., Mason, V. C. & Mann, S. O. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, R. W., Bratzler, J. W., James, W. H., Tillman, A. D. & Meek, D. C. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 475.Google Scholar
Wolin, M. J. (1960). J. Dairy Sci. 43, 1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar