Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:58:25.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of the rate of flow of dry matter in digesta passing through the duodenum of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2007

J. D. Oldham
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics. LE12 5RD
J. R. Ling
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics. LE12 5RD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A total of seven sheep fitted with re-entrant cannulas in the proximal duodenum were used in three experiments to measure the passage of dry matter (DM) in duodenal digesta.

2. Fifty-three 24 h measurements and ten 48 h measurements of DM flow were made in Expt 1. Coefficient of variation (CV) of these measurements was 22.1 % which was similar to variability reported for chromic oxide ‘corrected’ flows and for an estimate of day-to-day variation. DM flow on day 1 was 103.2 % (SE = 8.94) of flow on day 2 in 48 h measurements.

3. In two 3 × 3 Latin-square design experiments, duodenal DM flow was measured continuously over 72 h and on days 1, 2 and 3 DM flow was 100.4, 102.6 and 96.9 % (SE = 5.82) of mean flow (Expt 2) and 95.8, 101.2 and 103.0% (SE = 6.70) of mean flow (Expt 3) respectively.

4. It was concluded that no depression in duodenal DM flow occurred during the first 24 h of collection in these experiments and that the variability of repeated 24 h measurements of flow was within day-to-day variation.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 3 Ruminants, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Axford, R. F. E., Evans, R. A. & Offer, N. W. (1971). Res. vet. Sci. 12, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J., Goodall, E. D., Kay, R. N. B., Phillipson, A. T. & Vowles, L. E. (1966). Proc. R. Soc. B. 166, 46.Google Scholar
Corse, D. A. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 141.Google Scholar
Corse, D. A. & Sutton, J. D. (1971). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30, 18A.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J., Holmes, J. H. G. & Garrett, W. N. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1972). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 493.Google Scholar
Goodall, E. D. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). J. Physiol., Lond. 176, 12.Google Scholar
Leibholz, J. & Hartmann, P. E. (1972). Aust. J. agric. Res. 23, 1059.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. (1975). In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant, p. 261. [McDonald, I.W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale: University of New England.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C., Ulyatt, M. J., Pearce, P. D. & Hendtlass, J. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 39.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G. & Sutton, J. D. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 585.Google Scholar
Offer, N. W., Axford, R. F. E. & Evans, R. A. (1972). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31, 39A.Google Scholar
Offer, N. W., Evans, R. A. & Axford, R. F. E. (1972). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31, 104A.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F. (1975). Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. 1974, p. 66.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods 6th edn.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Youssef, F. G. & Oldham, J. D. (1976). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 100A.Google Scholar
Tas, M. V., Offer, N. W., Evans, R. A. & Axford, R. F. E. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 69A.Google Scholar
Thompson, F. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. & Lamming, G. E. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Coelho, da, Silva, J. F. & Armstrong, D. G. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B. & Goodall, E. D. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 261.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. & MacRae, J. C. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van 't Klooster, A. Th., Kemp, A., Geurinck, J. H. & Rogers, P. A. M. (1972). Neth. J. agric. Sci., 20, 314.Google Scholar
van 't Klooster, A. Th., Rogers, P. A. M. & Sharma, H. R. (1969). Neth. J. agric. Sci. 17, 60.Google Scholar