Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T09:48:22.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The maximum capacity of the bovine liver to excrete manganese in bile, and the effects of a manganese load on the rate of excretion of copper, iron and zinc in bile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Eveline D. Hall
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berks, RG16 ONN
H. W. Symonds
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berks, RG16 ONN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The maximum capacity of the bovine liver to excrete manganese in bile was determined in three Friesian-cross steers surgically prepared to allow bile flow-rate to be measured and samples collected. Plasma Mn concentrations were increased by infusing manganese chloride solutions into a jugular vein and the biliary excretion rates of Mn, copper, zinc and iron were measured.

2. The maximum capacity of the liver to excrete Mn in bile was exceeded at an infusion rate of approximately 4000 μg Mn/min, and at this rate there was a significant decrease in the concentration of Cu, Fe and Zn in bile. The maximum concentration (mean ± SE) of Mn in bile was 193 ± 19 μg/ml, and the maximum excretion rate (mean ± SE) was 1210 ± 130 μg/min for the three animals. There was no reduction in bile flow or evidence of liver damage as a result of the infusions.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1981

References

REFERENCES

Bentley, O. G. & Phillips, P. H. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertinchamps, A. J., Miller, S. T. & Cotzias, G. C. (1966). Am. J. Physiol. 211, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, F. (1967). Feed Forum. 2, 33.Google Scholar
Carter, J. C. Jr, Miller, W. J., Neathery, M. W., Gentry, R. P., Stake, P. E. & Blackmon, D. M. (1974). J. Anim. Sci. 38, 1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cikrt, M. (1973). Arch. Toxikol. 31, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, G. N., Wise, M. B. & Barrick, E. R. (1966). J. Anim. Sci. 25, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1972). Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 12, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. M. (1972). Animal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination. VIIth Int. Congr. p. 2011. Munchen.Google Scholar
Gambino, S. R. & Schreiber, H. (1964). Technicon Symposium, Automation in Analytical Chemistry, Basingstoke, Hants, Technicon Instruments Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Gibbons, R. A., Dixon, S. N., Hallis, K., Russell, A. M., Sansom, B. F. & Symonds, H. W. (1976). Biochim. biophys. Acta. 444, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubler, C. J., Taylor, D. S., Eichwald, E. J., Cartwright, G. E. & Wintrobe, M. M. (1954). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 86,223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidiroglou, M. (1979). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M. & Grieve, C. M. (1975). J. Dairy Sci. 58, 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järvinen, R. & Ahlström, A. (1975). Med. Biol. 53, 93.Google Scholar
Jendrassik, L. & Grof, P. (1938). Biochem. Z. 81, 297.Google Scholar
Kimura, M., Yagi, N. & Hokawa, Y. (1978). J. Toxic. Environ. Hlth 4, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaassen, C. D. (1974). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 29,458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, R. M. & Lilburn, M. S. (1978). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 32, 124.Google Scholar
Rojas, M. A., Dyer, I. A. & Cassatt, W. A. (1965). J. Anim. Sci. 24,664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sansom, B. F., Symonds, H. W. & Vagg, M. J. (1978). Res vet. Sci. 24, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, W. D. (1956). (editor). In Handbook of Biological Data, p. 163. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders co.Google Scholar
Symonds, H. W., Vagg, M. J. & Mather, D. L. (1979). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38,21A.Google Scholar
Watson, L. J., Ammerman, C. B., Feaster, J. P. & Roessler, C. E. (1973). J. Anim. Sci. 36, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witzleben, C. L. (1969). Am. J. Path. 57, 617.Google Scholar
Witzleben, C. L. (1971). Am. J. Path. 62, 181.Google Scholar
Witzleben, C. L., Pitlick, P., Bergmeyer, J. & Benoit, R. (1968). Am. J. Path. 53, 404.Google Scholar