Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T15:46:52.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immune response in rats given irradiated wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Vijayalaxmi
Vijayalaxmi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania, Hyderabad-500007, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Rats given diets containing freshly-irradiated wheat showed significantly lower mean antibody titres to four different antigens, decreased numbers of antibody-forming cells in the spleen and rosette-forming lymphocytes as compared to rats given either unirradiated wheat or irradiated wheat stored for a period of 12 weeks.

2. The immune response in rats given 90 g protein/kg diet was essentially similar to that seen in animals given 180 g protein/kg diet.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , November 1978 , pp. 535 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1965). Methods of Analysis, 10th ed., p. 779. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bhaskaram, C. & Sadasivan, G. (1975). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 28, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluestein, H. G. & Green, I. (1970). Nature, Lond. 228, 871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, A. H. & Bryan, C. G. (1961). Bacteriology, principles and practices. p. 340. London: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Chandra, R. K. (1975). Science, N. Y. 190, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, L., Lofroth, G. & Ehrenberg, A. (1965). Arkiv. Zool. 18, 195.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, B. M. & Newberne, P. M. (1974). Immunology 26, 489.Google Scholar
Gopalan, C. & Srikantia, S. G. (1973). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 16, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerne, N. K. & Nordin, A. A. (1963). Science N. Y. 140, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Expert Committee (1970). WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 451, 1.Google Scholar
Lofroth, G., Hanngren, K., Ehrenberg, L. & Ehrenberg, A. (1966). Arkiv. Zool. 18, 529.Google Scholar
Mathur, M., Ramalingaswami, V. & Deo, M. G. (1971). J. Nutr. 102, 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (1963). Publs Natn Acad. Sci. no. 1100, p. 31.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, A.I., Ponomareva, L.A., Geller, I. S., Rozgan, M. I. & Garipova, F. S. (1972). Farmakol. Toksikol. 35, 352.Google Scholar
Reddy, V., Jagadeesan, V., Raghuramulu, N., Bhaskaram, C. & Srikantia, S. G. (1976). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 29, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrimshaw, N. S., Taylor, C. E. & Gordon, J. E. (1968). WHO Monogr. Ser. no. 57.Google Scholar
Sell, S. (1964). J. Immunol. 93, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillinger, (1975). As cited in Fd Irrad. Inf. 5, 52.Google Scholar
Tasman, A., Vanramshorst, J. D. & Smith, L. (1960). J. Microbiol. Serol. 26, 413.Google Scholar
Vijayalaxmi, (1976). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijayalaxmi, & Sadasivan, G. (1975). Int. J. radiat. Biol. 27, 135.Google Scholar
Vijayalaxmi, & Visweswara Rao, K. (1975). Int. J. radiat. Biol. 29, 93.Google Scholar
WHO (1970). Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no, 451.Google Scholar
Wostmann, B. S., Pleasants, J. R. & Bealmear, P. (1971). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 30, 1779.Google Scholar
Wybran, J., Chantler, S. & Fudenberg, H. (1973). Lancet i, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar