Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T04:16:28.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The hydrogenation of the series of methylene-interrupted cis,cis-octadecadienoic acids by pure cultures of six rumen bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Patrick Kemp
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT
David J. Lander
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge CB2 4AT
R. T. Holman
Affiliation:
The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, Minnesota 55912, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The hydrogenation of all the methylene-interrupted cis, cis-octadecadienoic acids was examined using pure cultures of six rumen bacteria able to hydrogenate linoleic acid to stearic acid or its immediate precursor, trans-1 1-octadecenoic acid, after first conjugating the linoleic acid to cis,truns-9, 1 1-octadecadienoic acid.

2. Only the Δ 14-cis, 17-cis-isomer was not hydrogenated by at least one of the bacteria and no evidence was found that conjugation was necessary before hydrogenation except for the Δ 2-cis,5-cis- and Δ 9-cis, 12-cis-isomers. Several isomers were hydrogenated to an extent close to that achieved with linoleic acid (Δ 9-cis, 124s).

3. Those bacteria only able to hydrogenate linoleic to trans-1 1-octadecenoic acid gave only octadecenoic acid products and those bacteria able to hydrogenate linoleic acid to stearic gave variable yields of octadecenoic acids and stearic acid except with the isomers Δ 12-cis, 15-cis and Δ 13-cis, Idcis when only octadecenoic acids were detected.

4. At the substrate levels used (20 μg/ml), both inhibition and stimulation of growth were found but no common pattern emerged, nor was the growth consistently related to the extent of hydrogenation.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1984

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. (1957). Veterinary Record 69, 11501155.Google Scholar
Christie, W. W. & Holman, R. T. (1967). Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 1, 407423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, R. M. C. & Kemp, P. (1970). In physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant, pp. 504518 [Phillipson, A. t., editor]. Newcastle upon tyne: Oriel PressGoogle Scholar
Garcia, P. T., Christie, W. W., Jenkin, H. M., Anderson, L. & Holman, R. T. (1976). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 424, 296302.Google Scholar
Hazlewood, G. P. & Dawson, R. M. C. (1975). Journal of General Microbiology 89, 163174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlewood, G. P. & Dawson, R. M. C. (1979). Journal of General Microbiology 112, 1527.Google Scholar
Hazlewood, G. P., Kemp, P., Lander, D. J. & Dawson, R. M. C. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 35, 293297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, I. & Keeney, M. (1966). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 962966.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. & Lander, D. J. (1983). Biochemical Journal 216, 519522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P. & Lander, D. J. (1984). Journal of General Microbiology 130, 527533.Google Scholar
Kemp, P., Lander, D. J. & Gunstone, F. D. (1979). Abstracts 11th FEBS Meeting, Copenhagen. A51, 750.Google Scholar
Kemp, P., Lander, D. J. & Gunstone, F. D. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 52, 165170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P., White, R. W. & Lander, D. J. (1975). Journal of General Microbiology 90, 100114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepler, C. R. & Tove, S. B. (1967). Journal of Biological Chemistry 242, 56865692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepler, C. R., Tucker, W. P. & Tove, S. B. (1971). Journal of Biological Chemistry 246, 27652771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, M. J. & Sharpe, E. M. (1971). In isolation of Anaerobes, pp. 133147 [Shapton, D. a. and Board, R. G., editors]. London: Academic press.Google Scholar
Nieman, C. (1954). Bacteriological Reviews 18, 147167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar