Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T15:13:49.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Folic acid in ruminant nutrition: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2008

Veronika Ragaller*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute (FLI), Federal Research Institute of Animal Health, Bundesallee 50, 38116Braunschweig, Germany
Liane Hüther
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute (FLI), Federal Research Institute of Animal Health, Bundesallee 50, 38116Braunschweig, Germany
Peter Lebzien
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute (FLI), Federal Research Institute of Animal Health, Bundesallee 50, 38116Braunschweig, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Veronika Ragaller, fax +49 531 596 3199, email veronika.ragaller@fli.bund.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Folic acid plays an essential role in DNA and methionine metabolism. Micro-organisms in the rumen can synthesise folates, but it has not been verified that these amounts are sufficient to achieve the best efficiency of dairy cows. However, the amount of folates synthesised in the rumen could possibly, to some extent, be affected by the forage:concentrate ratio. Degradation of orally supplemented folic acid in the rumen seems to be very high (about 97 %), as supplementation of folic acid hardly increases folate concentrations in the digesta at the duodenum. However, it must be considered that dietary supplements of folic acid higher than 0·5 mg/kg body weight increased serum folate concentrations in all available studies and milk folate concentrations in most studies. Additionally, milk production tended to be increased in some studies. Therefore, degradation of folic acid in the rumen may be overestimated as folates can be absorbed at the proximal duodenum. For future research it is necessary to consider the whole flow and the metabolic pathways of folates from the rumen to duodenum, blood, tissue, milk and transfer to calf to declare requirement values for cows. Consequently, the present review discusses current knowledge and emphasises areas for future research.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

In general, it is assumed that B-vitamin requirements for ruminants can be met by microbial synthesis in the rumen, even when the animals are fed a diet providing very small amounts of those vitamins. This hypothesis was already established in 1928 by Bechdel et al. (Reference Bechdel, Honeywell, Dutcher and Knutsen1). However, since that time average milk and milk component yields have increased drastically (already by about 33 % in the last 15 years in the USA), whereas the increase of average DM intake was considerably lower (only about 15 %)(Reference Weiss and Ferreira2). Furthermore, feeding strategies changed to support the increase in milk production and milk component yields. Changes in diet composition (from less forage towards more concentrate) influence the microbial population in the rumen, so it is a moot point whether the B-vitamin requirements of dairy cows are still being met.

Folic acid is very important during lactation and for DNA synthesis of fetal and placental tissue during pregnancy(Reference McNulty, McPartlin, Weir and Scott3), therefore a suboptimal supply should be avoided. In agricultural practice in dairy cows, gestation and lactation are concomitant during several months per year, so the avoidance of progressive folate deficiency must be a priority.

Up to now the folate content of feed is rarely analysed and values on microbial folate synthesis are scarce. So it is very difficult to estimate a cow's actual supply with folates(4). The National Research Council(4) tried to estimate requirement values of folates for cows, but they had to extrapolate the cows' requirements from data of swine and average vitamin contents found in cows' milk. They estimated a daily folate requirement of 33 mg/d for tissue and 2 mg/d for milk for a dairy cow with a body weight (BW) of 650 kg and a milk production of 35 kg fat-corrected (4 %) milk per d. However, final evidence in the form of studies on cows' requirements is still lacking, as the number of appropriate studies is limited. Therefore this review will present current knowledge of folate metabolism and the influence of folic acid supplementation on ruminal variables, folate absorption and performance, especially for dairy cows. Areas on which future research should focus will be highlighted.

Chemical structure

The vitamin folic acid (chemical name pteroylglutamic acid) consists of three parts: a pteridine nucleus, para-aminobenzoic acid and glutamic acid(Reference Girard5). The name folic acid is deduced from folium, the Latin word for leaf, because native forms of folic acid were originally isolated from spinach leaves(Reference Mitchell, Snell and Williams6). In chemistry the name folic acid is only used for the synthetic form. It is a stable compound and the basal structure of a wide family of vitamin coenzymes(Reference Lucock7). In nature, more than 100 compounds, with the basal structure of folic acid, feature a common vitamin activity. These pteroylglutamate forms of folic acid are generally called folates(Reference Girard5, Reference Bender and Bender8, Reference Finglas, Wright, Wolfe, Hart, Wright and Dainty9). Native folates vary in three chemical characteristics from folic acid: first, in the level of reduction of the pteridine nucleus (dihydrofolate or tetrahydrofolate (THF)); second, in the character of the one-carbon substituent linked to the N atoms N-5 and N-10 (for example, formyl, formimino, methyl, methylene or methenyl residues); third, in the chain length of the glutamyl residues which can be linked to the γ-carboxyl group of the glutamate via peptide linkages(Reference Girard5, Reference Wagner, Olson, Broquist, Chichester, Darby, Kolbye and Stalvey10).

Absorption and biochemical functions

There are several excellent reviews on absorption and biochemical functions of folates(Reference Scott11Reference Bässler14). Derived from studies with non-ruminant animals, two mechanisms of folate absorption from the intestinal tract seem to exist: an active saturable process and a non-saturable passive process. In fact, the relative importance of passive absorption changes according to folate supply, increasing with the amounts of folates available(Reference Selhub, Dhar and Rosenberg13, Reference Bässler, Golly, Loew and Pietrzik15). However, folates are perhaps degraded, converted and synthesised in the forestomachs of ruminants(Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16), and even absorbed on a small scale(Reference Rérat, Molle and le Bars17). Unfortunately the forms and the availability of the forms present in rumen contents and duodenal digesta are unknown.

In bovine blood, mainly 5-methyl-THF is found(18). Cells take up this compound and demethylate it to THF. To retain THF in cells it must be converted by folylpolyglutamate synthase to polyglutamate THF, the coenzymic form of folates(Reference Bässler14). Polyglutamate THF is involved in several biochemical pathways in mammals(Reference Choi and Mason19). Mainly, folates are donors and acceptors of one-carbon units(Reference Bender and Bender8, Reference Benevenga20). Thus they are involved in the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine, as an essential part of the methylation cycle. This reaction is also vitamin B12 dependent, as the catalysing enzyme methionine synthase needs vitamin B12(Reference Scott11). Furthermore, the transfer of one carbon unit involves folates in the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines and thereby in DNA synthesis and cell proliferation(Reference Bässler14). THF is regenerated after these catalytic reactions(Reference Bässler14). However, folate disappears through urinary excretion and through bile, although a very effective reabsorption by the enterohepatic cycle exists(Reference Bässler, Golly, Loew and Pietrzik15). Up to now only one study reported on the urinary excretion of folates in dairy cows (nine animals) after intramuscular (i.m.) injection of 0·3 mg folic acid per kg BW(Reference Girard and Matte21). The authors found an excretion of the injected dose of 35·1 % after 8 h and 44·2 % after 48 h.

A deficit of folates can lead to a decrease in S-adenosylmethionine levels and to an abnormal DNA precursor metabolism resulting in faulty DNA synthesis and a decrease in NAD(Reference James, Miller, Mcgarrity and Morris22), as a decrease in NAD levels is consistent with an increase in DNA repair activity(Reference James, Yin and Swendseid23). An indirect lack of folates can be caused by a vitamin B12 deficit. This results in an accumulation of 5-methyl-THF called a methyl-trap, as 5-methyl-THF cannot be regenerated to THF(Reference Bässler, Golly, Loew and Pietrzik15). If so, cells are unable to conjugate absorbed folate monoglutamates, resulting in a decreased intracellular folate polyglutamate level. Additionally, intracellular folate accumulation declines as only polyglutamates can be retained in cells(Reference Scott and Weir24).

As folates influence DNA synthesis and the methionine cycle, they are involved in the metabolic pathways of reproduction and milk protein synthesis; therefore they are very important especially in gestating and lactating cows. An additional special situation for cows is that they have a very high demand for methyl groups in early lactation. Concurrently some precursors for methylated compounds (for example, serine and glycine) are also needed for gluconeogenesis, as the amounts of glucose reaching the small intestine through the digestive system are generally low. So, coincident demand for precursors of methylated compounds leads to competition between different metabolic pathways, for example, gluconeogenesis, lecithin synthesis, DNA synthesis and remethylation of methionine(Reference Girard and Matte25, Reference Bruesemeister and Suedekum26).

Sources and stability of folates

The following section gives a survey of approximate folate concentrations in some feeds and foods. Different folate contents are given in the literature for the same feedstuffs (Table 1) and for most feeds they are not analysed at all, so only few data are available. It must be considered that as compilations were used in Table 1, the number of samples analysed is not known. Additionally, it must be pointed out that the native folate concentrations in feeds vary due to influences of climate, species, vegetation stage, habitat and fertiliser(Reference Albers, Gotterbarm, Heimbeck, Keller, Seehawer and Tran27). Furthermore, most naturally occurring folates are chemically relatively unstable. Thus folates exhibit a significant loss of activity during harvesting, storage and processing, but measured folate concentrations are also highly influenced by the method used for sample preparation(Reference Gregory28). The synthetic form, folic acid, is more resistant to chemical oxidation(Reference Scott11).

Table 1 Folate content of several feeds given in the literature

LfL, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft.

The figures generally show very low folate contents in feedstuffs. However, quantities are not the only decisive factor; the folates in the feed must also be available for absorption(Reference Wagner, Olson, Broquist, Chichester, Darby, Kolbye and Stalvey10). The so-called bioavailability describes the proportion of an orally administered dose which is available in plasma after absorption(Reference van den Berg and Schlemmer29). It is difficult to consider the bioavailability of native folates because unknown numbers and amounts of folate metabolites exist in every plant species or feedstuff. For ruminants the assessment of folate bioavailability is more difficult as their micro-organisms in the rumen synthesise, but also degrade, ingested folates. The synthesis and degradation of folates in the rumen is crucial for the amount absorbed from the small intestine of ruminants. Up until now the number of studies on rumen folate synthesis and degradation has been very low; therefore for ruminants no values of folate bioavailability from feedstuffs are available. Furthermore the bioavailability of native folates is influenced by different physico-chemical properties and certain feed constituents. For example, polyglutamyl folates have a lower bioavailability than monoglutamyl folates, as polyglutamyl folates must be hydrolysed to monoglutamates before absorption(Reference Seyoum and Selhub30). Additionally, the actual amount available for each individual animal varies depending on differences in intestinal pH or general living conditions(Reference Wagner, Olson, Broquist, Chichester, Darby, Kolbye and Stalvey10).

Microbial synthesis, degradation and absorption of folates in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants

It is well known that the microbial activity and the ruminal population are influenced by the level of concentrates in the diet and the type of feed(Reference Hungate and Hungate31). As some bacterial species are able to synthesise folates, and some others need them(Reference Wolin, Miller and Hobson32), different amounts of folates can be synthesised and used in the rumen depending on the feed composition. For steers, Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33) and Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34) described a relationship between the proportion of concentrates in the diet and the amount of folates in the rumen. High-concentrate diets resulted in an increase of folates (Table 2). The authors hypothesised that this increase is due to an enhanced microbial activity in the rumen, caused by rapidly degradable carbohydrates. But it must also be considered that concentrations are not necessarily representative of the total amount synthesised in the rumen, as digesta passage and rumen volume could vary between treatments, for example, due to fibre differing greatly in amount and length. Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35) could not corroborate this hypothesis for cows, because they found no difference in the amount of folates in the liquid fraction of ruminal content between the high-forage (58 % forage) and low-forage (37 % forage) diets (Table 2). However, the concentrate:forage ratio of the two diets used in the study of Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35) was not as extreme as in the studies with the steers(Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33, Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34) and additionally Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35) used diets with more ingredients than Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34) and Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33) (Table 2). Furthermore the steers had a BW of 340 kg(Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33) and 352 (se 27) kg(Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34), whereas primiparous and multiparous cows weighed 582 (se 17) kg and 692 (se 17) kg(Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35), respectively, which resulted in a different DM intake between cows and steers (Table 2). It should be noted that in all three studies folate concentrations in ruminal fluid were very different. One reason for this could possibly be the different diet composition used in the three studies (Table 2). Additionally, Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33), who found the highest values, used a different sample preparation method from Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34) and Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35). The higher values found by Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33) in the supernatant fraction could result from bacterial content, as the samples were centrifuged after freezing and thawing, which could have destroyed bacterial cells. Contrary to this, Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34) and Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35) centrifuged their samples before freezing. Furthermore, Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33) used a microbiological assay (Streptococcus faecalis) to analyse folate concentration in ruminal samples. In contrast, Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34) and Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35) analysed their samples by radioassay.

Table 2 Folate content of ruminal material and body weight (BW) (at the beginning of the trial) of steers and cows

(Mean values with their standard errors)

a,b,c Mean values within a trial with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P ≤ 0·05).

* In these studies no DM values of feed were given; therefore fresh matter values are presented here.

This study was conducted with steers.

In this study values of the solid and liquid fraction of the ruminal content were given as area under the curve; concentrations presented here are calculated on this basis.

§ Data from primiparous cows.

Data from multiparous cows.

An in vitro study by Hall et al. (Reference Hall, Cheng and Burroughs36) showed that the degradation of fibrous materials by rumen micro-organisms increases (42 %) with supplementation of folic acid (100 μg/20 ml medium). So it seems that cellulolytic micro-organisms require folates, which would endorse the findings of Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33) and Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34), who found decreased folate concentrations with high-forage diets. Studies on folate requirements of micro-organisms are rare. Some strains of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, a cellulolytic rod, seem to require either folic acid, THF or p-aminobenzoic acid(Reference Ayers37Reference Bryant and Robinson40) (which is a part of folic acid). Also two strains of Ruminococcus albus require folic acid(Reference Bryant and Robinson40). Furthermore Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Mitchell, Little and Bradley33) observed that the level of folates in the ruminal fluid correlated negatively with pH. This corroborates the previous findings, because R. flavefaciens is sensitive to acid(Reference Miyazaki, Hino and Itabashi41) and ruminal pH increases with diets rich in fibre. Since these studies were conducted, feeding strategies, genetics and keeping conditions have changed, and it would be interesting to see if similar and if possible even more detailed results relating to species of micro-organisms could be obtained today.

Consequent to folic acid supplementation to steers, Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34) observed an increase in folate concentration in the solid and liquid fractions of the rumen contents compared with a supplement-free diet (P = 0·0001 for both fractions; Table 2). However, different from supplement-free diets, the concentrate:forage ratio had no influence on the ruminal folate concentration. Furthermore, they observed that neither folic acid supplementation nor the nature of the diet made a difference to the quantity of protein synthesised per unit of microbial mass(Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34). Chiquette et al. (Reference Chiquette, Girard and Matte42) analysed the effect of folic acid supplementation on digestibility and ruminal fermentation in growing steers. They noticed a tendency (P = 0·08) of pH to decline 4–8 h after feeding a diet consisting of 70 % rolled barley, 30 % timothy hay and a supplementation of 2 mg folic acid per kg BW as compared with the unsupplemented diet. The results showed that the concentration of ruminal acetate and butyrate did not change due to folic acid supplementation, whereas ruminal propionate concentrations increased (P ≤ 0·05) after feeding, and the acetate:propionate ratio was numerically higher during the 24 h of observation due to folic acid supplementation. The apparent digestibility of DM, fibre fractions and crude protein was not influenced by the addition of folic acid(Reference Chiquette, Girard and Matte42). So it seems that folic acid has no major influence on digestibility and ruminal fermentation, but until today these processes have only been tested once (with eight steers), comparing few different diet compositions, so it is difficult to extrapolate these data to other experimental conditions.

Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43) and Schwab et al. (Reference Schwab, Schwab, Shaver, Girard, Putnam and Whitehouse44) determined the daily apparent ruminal folate synthesis for lactating cows without supplementation of folic acid, whereas Zinn et al. (Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16) provided data for growing steers (Table 3). On average, Schwab et al. (Reference Schwab, Schwab, Shaver, Girard, Putnam and Whitehouse44) calculated 16·2 mg daily apparent folate synthesis and Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43) 20·0 mg. Strikingly opposing these results, Zinn et al. (Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16) on average calculated a negative daily apparent ruminal folate synthesis of − 0·1 mg for growing steers (194 kg BW). These results could be due to the fact that growing male animals which were used in their experiment had a much lower organic matter intake (3·44 kg organic matter/d) than the adult female animals of Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43) (18·4 kg organic matter/d; calculated from DM intake and ash content of the diet) and Schwab et al. (Reference Schwab, Schwab, Shaver, Girard, Putnam and Whitehouse44) (18·7 kg organic matter/d) and due to the differences in the ruminal passage rate. Additionally, the negative values of Zinn et al. (Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16) could also result from a dietary effect, as Zinn et al. (Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16) fed a diet with a very high concentration of maize grain, in contrast to diets used in the studies of Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43) and Schwab et al. (Reference Schwab, Schwab, Shaver, Girard, Putnam and Whitehouse44) (Table 3).

Table 3 Folate intake, duodenal flow, ileal flow, apparent synthesis (AS) and body weight (at the beginning of the trial) of steers and cows

(Mean values with their standard errors)

NFC, non-fibre carbohydrates; s., steers; m., multiparous cows; p., primiparous cows.

* Apparent synthesis = duodenal flow minus intake.

Values did not differ significantly.

In Zinn et al. (Reference Rérat, Molle and le Bars17) and Santschi et al. (Reference Schwab, Schwab, Shaver, Girard, Putnam and Whitehouse44) apparent ruminal synthesis was not calculated by the authors, but daily intake and duodenal flows were given. Furthermore, Santschi et al. (Reference Schwab, Schwab, Shaver, Girard, Putnam and Whitehouse44) declare no levels of significance at all, therefore it was not possible to characterise significance in these studies.

§ Forage = 50 % maize silage, 33 % lucerne hay, 17 % grass hay.

sem, not se, was used.

Significant effects of NFC (P ≤ 0·05).

** Significant effects of forage (P ≤ 0·05).

It must be pointed out that disappearance rates, expressed as the amount of folates appearing at the duodenum relative to the quantity given, were very high in all experiments with dietary supplements of folic acid (about 97 %)(Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16, Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43). Therefore it is arguable whether unprotected folic acid can be supplemented effectively. However, one has to keep in mind that disappearance could either be caused by degradation or absorption(Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16). Indeed, a net flux across the rumen wall was only found if high amounts of folic acid were present in the rumen. So it seems that the rumen wall is able to absorb folic acid. However, the efficiency is very low, so net flux across the rumen wall into the blood circulation can be neglected(Reference Girard, Lapierre, Desrochers, Benchaar, Matte and Remond45, Reference Girard and Remond46). On the other hand, folates are absorbed at the proximal intestine(Reference Girard and Remond46), and therefore they could already be absorbed at the proximal duodenum before the cannula, hence ruminal disappearance of folic acid could be overestimated(Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43).

Table 3 gives a survey of the amount of folates found in the duodenum. The apparent intestinal disappearance (between duodenal and ileal cannula) seems to be very low(Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43). Without supplementation of folic acid, the duodenal flow of folates was lower than the ileal flow, and it rose above the ileal flow only by supplementation of folic acid (Table 3). So it seems that there is no apparent intestinal disappearance of folates without supplementation of folic acid and with supplementation the apparent intestinal disappearance approximates 4 %(Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43). Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43) hypothesised that the apparent intestinal absorption of folates is underestimated, as folates are extensively recycled by the enterohepatic cycle and then released between the duodenal and ileal cannula – thus explaining the higher values of folates in the ileal flow.

Generally, Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Lapierre, Desrochers, Benchaar, Matte and Remond45) reason that for dairy cows, folate absorption in the gastrointestinal tract is an active saturable process. With dietary supplements of 2·6 g folic acid/d this process was already saturated, as higher supplementations could not effectively increase the amount of folate reaching the blood circulation. Due to the destruction of folates by micro-organisms, and the low importance of passive absorption, they deduced the minor efficiency of folate absorption in ruminants ( < 5 %)(Reference Girard, Lapierre, Desrochers, Benchaar, Matte and Remond45)v. humans (10–46 %)(Reference Zettner, Boss and Seegmiller47). In general it should be considered that at present no studies are available comparing the amount of folates in the ruminal content and the amount in the duodenum, hence no statement can be made on the coherence between the amount of folates in the ruminal content and the amount of folates in the digesta at the duodenum.

Folate concentrations in blood, milk and liver

Blood

Table 4 shows serum folate concentrations in different feeding studies with cows. Without supplementation of folic acid serum folate levels varied between 13·6 and 17·2 ng/ml. In plasma Santschi et al. (Reference Santschi, Chiquette, Berthiaume, Martineau, Matte, Mustafa and Girard35) found significantly (P = 0·005) lower folate concentration for primiparous cows (12·7 (se 1·6) ng/ml) compared with multiparous cows (18·4 (se 1·6) ng/ml). These observations were not affected by the composition of the diet (58 or 37 % forage).

Table 4 Average serum folate concentration (ng/ml) of cows with and without dietary supplementation of folic acid

(Mean values with their standard errors)

p., Primiparous cows; m., multiparous cows; BW, body weight.

* Concentration determined in serum from cows before parturition.

Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay50) and Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54) declare no levels of significance between cows before parturition and after parturition; therefore it was not possible to characterise significance in these studies.

Concentration determined in serum from cows after parturition.

§ Significant effect between primiparous and multiparous cows.

Significant differences (P ≤ 0·05) between control and folate groups.

Concentrations determined in serum from cows 18 weeks after calving.

Without supplementation, serum and plasma folate concentrations increase after parturition, as the maternal–fetal complex no longer requires folates (Fig. 1). However, starting on the day of parturition, the cow requires folates for milk production, but it seems that this demand is lower than that for the maternal–fetal complex(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48, Reference Girard and Matte49). From mating (about 2 months after previous parturition) to parturition Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay50) found a decrease of total serum folates of 40 %, indicating that the maternal–fetal complex has an increasing demand for folate. Also, Girard & Matte(Reference Girard and Matte21) discovered a higher demand for folates in the tissues of lactating and gestating cows than in lactating non-gestating cows. Serum clearance was significantly slower (P = 0·04) in non-gestating cows after an intravenous injection of 50 μg folic acid. However, in another study, Girard & Matte(Reference Girard and Matte49) could not find a difference in serum folate concentrations between gestating and non-gestating cows.

Fig. 1 Serum folate concentration of cows fed different daily folic acid supplements (according to Girard & Matte(Reference Girard and Matte49), modified). (–♦–), Unsupplemented; (–□–), 2 mg folic acid/kg body weight; (–▲–), 4 mg folic acid/kg body weight.

Oral supplementation (Table 4) or i.m. injection of folic acid significantly increased serum folate concentrations(Reference Girard, Chiquette and Matte34, Reference Girard, Lapierre, Desrochers, Benchaar, Matte and Remond45, Reference Girard and Matte49Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54). Actually, oral doses higher than 0·5 mg folic acid/kg BW are required to produce a noticeable effect in serum folate concentration, as concluded from a dose–response study with heifers (150 kg BW)(Reference Girard, Matte and Levesque51). However, the heifers used in the present study were very young and therefore full ruminal function may not have been developed. Comparable investigations have not been carried out again and in all further studies supplementations higher then 0·5 mg folic acid/kg BW were used. As shown in Fig. 1, folic acid supplementation increased serum folate concentrations in cows from 4 weeks before calving until calving. The increase intensified with higher dietary supplementation(Reference Girard and Matte49). Unfortunately no further measurements were performed between the initial sampling time 4 weeks before calving and at the time of calving, so it is not evident if serum folate levels had already increased before calving due to dietary supplementation. After calving, supplemented cows had decreasing serum folate concentrations. The more folic acid was added to the diet, the sharper the decline, reaching a plateau value 16 weeks after parturition(Reference Girard and Matte49). As well as the influence of folic acid supplementation, Girard & Matte(Reference Girard and Matte49) (P = 0·0001) and Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53) (P = 0·02) showed a significant time effect, as the gain in serum folate concentration due to dietary supplementation was greater in the first 8 weeks of lactation than later in lactation (Fig. 1). It seems that increasing serum folate concentrations during early lactation could result from a decreased ability of the cells to retain and use folates(Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53). A reason for this may be generally lower serum vitamin B12 levels (181 pg/ml) at early lactation compared with 252 pg/ml in the later lactation(Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53); therefore folates can get into the methyl-trap mentioned above.

Three studies are available dealing with an influence of folic acid supplementation on packed cell volume and Hb concentrations in blood. In one study with an oral supplementation of 4 mg folic acid/kg BW an increase (P ≤ 0·05) in packed cell volume and Hb in primiparous cows was found 16 weeks after parturition compared with non-supplemented primiparous cows(Reference Girard and Matte49). Oral supplementation of folic acid had no effect on these variables in multiparous cows(Reference Girard and Matte49, Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53). These effects could be explained by generally lower vitamin B12 levels in primiparous compared with multiparous cows, as folates and vitamin B12 are both required for DNA synthesis (as described in the ‘Absorption and biochemical functions’ section)(Reference Girard and Matte49). Hence a lack of each individual vitamin or of both vitamins together can delay the maturation of blood cells(Reference Bills, Koury, Clifford and Dessypris55). Folic acid supplemented to primiparous cows, which have low vitamin B12 levels, may decrease the deficit in DNA synthesis that results in higher packed cell volume and blood Hb values. However, it must be pointed out that changes of packed cell volume and blood Hb due to folic acid supplementation are smaller than natural changes taking place during lactation(Reference Girard and Matte49, Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54). No effects on these parameters were found in either primiparous or multiparous cows with i.m. injections of 160 mg folic acid once per week(Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54).

Up to now Graulet et al. (Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48) are the only authors studying the influence of folic acid on plasma concentrations of amino acids and glucose. Between week 3 before calving and week 8 after calving, supplementation of folic acid significantly increased plasma concentrations of alanine, glycine, serine, threonine and total sulfur amino acids. Concurrently, plasma concentrations of glucose and aspartate significantly decreased(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48). As aspartate is one of the main N-donors during purine biosynthesis, a decrease in plasma aspartate levels due to folic acid supplementation could be based on an increased DNA formation. A higher availability of glycine and serine could induce an increase in 1-C-donors for synthesis of methyl-THF(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48). So far these are the only explanations for the observed effects. Therefore it would be interesting to conduct further studies on the influence of folic acid supplementation on plasma concentrations of amino acids and glucose.

As the few available studies show increasing folate concentrations in serum and plasma, it is important to study the influence of folic acid supplementation on blood variables and thus on whole-animal metabolism.

Milk

Supplementation of folic acid does not influence feed intake(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48, Reference Girard and Matte52, Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53). However, the effects of folic acid supplementation on milk production of cows vary (Table 5). For gestating primiparous and multiparous cows, Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54) found a non-significant increase in milk production of 14 % in the last part of lactation due to an i.m. injection of 160 mg folic acid once per week. However, they could not find an effect on milk production immediately after calving. In contrast, Girard & Matte(Reference Girard and Matte52) found an increased milk production of 6 % during the first 100 d of lactation (P = 0·06) for multiparous cows receiving 4 mg folic acid per kg BW and a 10 % increase from day 100 to day 200 (P = 0·05). For primiparous cows, however, milk production decreased in the first 100 d of lactation (P ≤ 0·08) with a supplementation of 2 and 4 mg folic acid per kg BW; in the following lactation no effect could be noticed. Graulet et al. (Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48) only studied the first 56 d of lactation; during this time cows fed a supplement of 2·6 g folic acid per d showed a significant (P = 0·01) increase in milk production (Table 5). The effects on multiparous cows could result from folate body stores depleted by several lactations and gestations. The effects on primiparous cows were explained by their generally lower vitamin B12 levels compared with multiparous cows(Reference Girard and Matte52, Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54). Graulet et al. (Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48) established the hypothesis that higher milk production during folic acid supplementation results from an improved synthesis of purines and pyrimidines which are necessary for DNA replication. This hypothesis could be supported by the decreased plasma aspartate levels mentioned earlier. These different hypotheses and observations make clear that more studies are necessary to find an explanation for the effects and to discover under which conditions the effects can be reproduced, as Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53) could not find any effect on the milk production of multiparous cows by either supplementing 3 or 6 mg folic acid per kg BW (Table 5).

Table 5 Influence of oral folic acid supplementation on milk production and composition

(Mean values and standard errors)

BW, body weight; m., multiparous cows; p., primiparous cows.

* BW measured at the beginning of the trial, 1 month before calving.

Data from multiparous cows.

This value was calculated and shows the average daily milk production for the whole lactation period.

§ Data from primiparous cows.

Significant effect between control and folate groups.

BW measured at the beginning of the trial, 3 weeks before calving.

** This value is the mean from data determined in the first 8 weeks of lactation.

Folate occurs in cows' milk mainly as 5-methyl-THF, whereas approximately half of it exists as mono- and the other as polyglutamates(Reference Wigertz and Jägerstad56). Almost all folate in cows' milk is bound to specific folate-binding proteins. Generally, the highest milk folate concentrations are found in the colostrum. Starting at parturition, folate concentrations in milk decrease until 4 weeks after parturition when folate concentrations reach a plateau which is stable until the end of lactation(Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54). All studies with different levels of oral folic acid supplementations showed significantly increased milk folate concentrations(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48, Reference Girard and Matte49, Reference Girard and Matte52, Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53) (Table 5). In humans the transfer of folates into milk is controlled by an active-transport mechanism in the mammary glands. The transfer is linked to the secretion of folate-binding proteins. Once the binding capacity is saturated no further folates can be transferred into the milk(Reference Kirksey, Hamosh and Goldman57). The same seems to be true for cows, as supplementations higher than 3 mg/kg BW could not increase milk folate concentrations while serum folate concentration increased(Reference Girard and Matte49, Reference Girard and Matte52, Reference Girard, Lapierre, Matte and Lobley53) (Tables 4 and 5). As observed for serum, the response of milk concentrations of folates to oral supplementation of folic acid was greater during the first 8 weeks after calving then later in lactation(Reference Girard and Matte49). However, i.m. injection of folic acid could not influence milk folate concentrations during the first part of lactation(Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay50, Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54). Furthermore, in contrast to the results after an oral supplementation of folic acid, i.m. injection of folic acid tended to increase the folate content only in the colostrum and during progressed lactation(Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54).

At present, only four studies are available dealing with milk components. In these four studies an influence of folic acid on milk protein and casein was detected for multiparous cows. It seems that i.m. injections and oral supplementations of folic acid increase milk protein and casein concentrations or yields(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48, Reference Girard and Matte52Reference Girard, Matte and Tremblay54) (see Table 5). The authors explained these effects by depleted folate body stores and generally higher folate requirements because of higher milk production and heavier calves of multiparous cows. Additionally, they hypothesised that the effects on milk protein, similar to the effect on milk production, arise from either an increased synthesis of purines and pyrimidines for DNA synthesis, from an increased secretory capacity of the cells, or from amino acid interconversion which perhaps results in a greater supply of essential amino acids.

It becomes apparent that more studies on supplementation of folic acid are needed to examine the influence on milk production and milk components and its causes.

Liver

After a single supplementation of 2·6 g folic acid Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Lapierre, Desrochers, Benchaar, Matte and Remond45) could not find a significant increase in the amount of folates taken up by the liver during a 24 h period (calculated from folate flow through portal-drained viscera and total splanchnic tissue). Before the supplementation approximately 50 % of the portal blood folates were extracted by the liver; after supplementation only approximately 30 % were extracted (calculated from averaged net flux per h). Graulet et al. (Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48) studied the concentration of folates in liver biopsies. Cows receiving a daily supplementation of 2·6 g folic acid had significantly (P = 0·0001) increased liver folate concentrations of 2·56 μg/g DNA compared with control cows with 1·50 μg/g DNA during the first 8 weeks of lactation. The results of these two studies led to the assumption that folic acid supplementation increases the liver folate concentration but decreases the percentage of extraction from arterial blood into the liver. Lower percentages of extraction reflect that more folates are available for post-splanchnic tissues, as for example the mammary glands. This fact was confirmed by the results of Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Lapierre, Desrochers, Benchaar, Matte and Remond45) who found 71 % of folates from arterial blood in post-splanchnic tissues after supplementation of 2·6 g folic acid and only 50 % without supplementation. Beside the increase in liver folate concentration Graulet et al. (Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48) found higher values of total lipids, TAG and cholesterol in the liver during the first 2 weeks of lactation following a daily supplementation of 2·6 g folic acid. They explained these higher values with an increased mobilisation of body reserves during the first weeks of lactation which is necessary to meet the requirements for the above-mentioned increases in milk production and milk protein yield. Another explanation for an increase in TAG could be an inhibition of the β-oxidation of fatty acids in the liver, caused by a lack of vitamin B12, as cows receiving folic acid and vitamin B12 had no increase in TAG(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48). If it can be proven that folic acid supplementations increase lipid values in the liver during the first weeks of lactation, a time when the risk of fatty liver is high, supplementation of folic acid during this time would be questionable. Therefore further studies with a higher number of animals are needed, as up to now only twenty-four multiparous cows have been tested.

Future research directions

For ruminants future research should focus on the determination of the demand for folates. Up until now only requirement values for tissue and milk have been estimated, but they were derived from swine experiments and folate concentrations in cows' milk. Therefore it is necessary to examine the influence of different amounts of folic acid supplementation under different feeding regimens on rumen variables (for example, pH, volatile fatty acids, microbial population, degradation and synthesis of folates by micro-organisms) and available quantity and forms of folates for absorption at the intestinal tract. Additionally, understanding of mechanisms and sites of folate absorption in ruminants is insufficient; some authors mentioned a possible absorption of folates before the duodenal cannula(Reference Zinn, Owens, Stuart, Dunbar and Norman16, Reference Santschi, Berthiaume, Matte, Mustafa and Girard43), for example, at the beginning of the duodenum or in the abomasum. Furthermore, knowledge on the passage of folates from the intestine to blood and their following distribution to tissues and milk is important. The influences of an oral folic acid supplementation on amino acids and glucose concentrations in blood were tested only once and significant differences were found, but so far no explanations exist(Reference Graulet, Matte, Desrochers, Doepel, Palin and Girard48). The present review shows that very often controversial results exist, for example, the influence of folic acid supplementation on milk production or the influence of feed ration on folic acid availability in the rumen, therefore surveys should be conducted to reassess the variability of previous studies. Also, maximum and minimum daily intake limits are neither available for folic acid, nor for any other B vitamins(58). Indeed, no toxic reactions appeared in any of the experiments mentioned above. As the present review shows, there are many unanswered questions regarding the effects of folates for cows. Therefore the following list points out desirable research areas concerning folates:

  1. (1) Studies with different feeding regimens, with and without folic acid supplementation, should be conducted to assess the influence of the diet on folate degradation, synthesis and absorption in the rumen and the duodenum on the one hand and the influence on digestibility and ruminal fermentation on the other hand.

  2. (2) In vitro studies with ruminal micro-organisms would be helpful to characterise their folate requirements and synthesis.

  3. (3) Research on the mechanism and the sites of folate absorption in ruminants is necessary.

  4. (4) Experiments on the interactions of physiological stage and folate metabolism in dairy cows are essential.

  5. (5) Surveys should be conducted to explain the available effects of folic acid supplementation on concentrations of amino acids and glucose in blood.

  6. (6) Studies to ascertain the whole flow of folates through the body and implications of folic acid supplementation on the whole organism of dairy cows are crucial.

  7. (7) Further studies should focus on the effects of folic acid supplementation on liver metabolism and milk.

  8. (8) Further determinations of folate concentrations in feedstuffs are required to calculate the folate intake.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the German Research Foundation (DFG) who supported V. R. with a grant. V. R. wrote the manuscript and the draft was discussed and revised by L. H. and P. L. None of the authors has a conflict of interest.

References

1Bechdel, SI, Honeywell, HE, Dutcher, RA & Knutsen, MH (1928) Synthesis of vitamin B in the rumen of the cow. J Biol Chem 80, 231238.Google Scholar
2Weiss, W & Ferreira, G (2006) Water soluble vitamins for dairy cattle. In Proceedings of the 2006 Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA, 25–26 April 2006, pp. 51–63.http://tristatedairy.osu.edu/Weiss.pdf.Google Scholar
3McNulty, H, McPartlin, JM, Weir, DG & Scott, JM (1993) Folate catabolism is increased during pregnancy in rats. J Nutr 123, 10891093.Google ScholarPubMed
4National Research Council (2001) Vitamins. In Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th revised ed., pp. 162177. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
5Girard, CL (1998) B-complex vitamins for dairy cows: a new approach. Can J Anim Sci 78, 7190.Google Scholar
6Mitchell, HK, Snell, EE & Williams, RJ (1944) Folic acid. I. Concentration from spinach. J Am Chem Soc 66, 267268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Lucock, M (2000) Folic acid: nutritional biochemistry, molecular biology, and role in disease processes. Mol Genet Metab 71, 121138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Bender, DA (1992) Folic acid and other pterins and vitamin B12. In Nutritional Biochemistry of the Vitamins, pp. 269317 [Bender, DA, editor]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
9Finglas, PM, Wright, AJA, Wolfe, CA, Hart, DJ, Wright, DM & Dainty, JR (2003) Is there more to folates than neural-tube defects? Proc Nutr Soc 62, 591598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Wagner, C (1984) Folic acid. In Present Knowledge in Nutrition, pp. 332346 [Olson, RE, Broquist, HP, Chichester, CO, Darby, WJ, Kolbye, AC and Stalvey, RM, editors]. Washington, DC: The Nutrition Foundation, Inc.Google Scholar
11Scott, JM (1999) Folate and vitamin B12. Proc Nutr Soc 58, 441448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Wright, AJA, Dainty, JR & Finglas, PM (2007) Folic acid metabolism in human subjects revisited: potential implications for proposed mandatory folic acid fortification in the UK. Br J Nutr 98, 667675.Google Scholar
13Selhub, J, Dhar, GJ & Rosenberg, IH (1983) Gastrointestinal absorption of folates and antifolates. Pharmacol Ther 20, 397418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Bässler, KH (1997) Enzymatic effects of folic acid and vitamin B12. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 67, 385388.Google ScholarPubMed
15Bässler, KH, Golly, I, Loew, D & Pietrzik, K (2002) Vitamin-Lexikon für Ärzte, Apotheker und Ernährungswissenschaftler (Vitamin Encyclopedia for Physicians, Pharmacists and Nutrition Scientists), 3rd ed.Munich and Jena: Urban & Fischer.Google Scholar
16Zinn, RA, Owens, FN, Stuart, RL, Dunbar, JR & Norman, BB (1987) B-vitamin supplementation of diets for feedlot calves. J Anim Sci 65, 267277.Google Scholar
17Rérat, A, Molle, J & le Bars, H (1958) Mise en évidence chez le Mouton de la perméabilité du rumen aux vitamines B et conditions de leur absorption à ce niveau (Demonstration in the sheep of the permeability of the rumen to the B vitamins and the conditions for their absorption at that level). C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci 246, 20512054.Google Scholar
18Anonymous (1992) Interspecies differences in folate metabolsim. Nutr Rev 50, 116118.Google Scholar
19Choi, SW & Mason, JB (2000) Folate and carcinogenesis: an integrated scheme. J Nutr 130, 129132.Google Scholar
20Benevenga, NJ (2004) The Encyclopedia of Farm Animal Nutrition. Wallingford, Oxon: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
21Girard, CL & Matte, JJ (1995) Serum clearance and urinary excretion of pteroylmonoglutamic acid in gestating and lactating dairy cows. Br J Nutr 74, 857865.Google ScholarPubMed
22James, SJ, Miller, BJ, Mcgarrity, LJ & Morris, SM (1994) The effect of folic-acid and/or methionine deficiency on deoxyribonucleotide pools and cell-cycle distribution in mitogen-stimulated rat lymphocytes. Cell Prolif 27, 395406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23James, SJ, Yin, L & Swendseid, ME (1989) DNA strand break accumulation, thymidylate synthesis and NAD levels in lymphocytes from methyl donor-deficient rats. J Nutr 119, 661664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Scott, JM & Weir, DG (1976) Folate composition, synthesis and function in natural materials. Clin Haematol 5, 547568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Girard, CL & Matte, JJ (2006) Impact of B-vitamin supply on major metabolic pathways of lactating dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci 86, 213220.Google Scholar
26Bruesemeister, F & Suedekum, K-H (2006) Rumen-protected choline for dairy cows: the in situ evaluation of a commercial source and literature evaluation of effects on performance and interactions between methionine and choline metabolism. Anim Res 55, 93104.Google Scholar
27Albers, N, Gotterbarm, G, Heimbeck, W, Keller, T, Seehawer, J & Tran, TD (2002) Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Wirkstoffe in der Tierernährung (Vitamins in Animal Nutrition). Bonn: Agrimedia.Google Scholar
28Gregory, JI (1989) Chemical and nutritional aspects of folate research: analytical procedures, methods of folate synthesis, stability, and bioavailability of dietary folates. Adv Food Nutr Res 33, 1101.Google Scholar
29van den Berg, H (1993) General aspects of bioavailability of vitamins. In Proceedings Bioavailability 93; Nutritional, Chemical and Food Processing Implications of Nutrient Availability, pp. 267278 [Schlemmer, U, editor]. Karlsruhe: Bundesforschungsanstalt für Ernährung.Google Scholar
30Seyoum, E & Selhub, J (1998) Properties of food folates determined by stability and susceptibility to intestinal pteroylpolyglutamate hydrolase action. J Nutr 128, 19561960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Hungate, RE (1966) Variations in the rumen. In The Rumen and its Microbes, pp. 376418 [Hungate, RE, editor]. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
32Wolin, MJ & Miller, TL (1988) Microbe–microbe interactions. In The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, pp. 343359 [Hobson, PN, editor]. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
33Hayes, BW, Mitchell, GE, Little, CO & Bradley, NW (1966) Concentrations of B-vitamins in ruminal fluid of steers fed different levels and physical forms of hay and grain. J Anim Sci 25, 539542.Google Scholar
34Girard, CL, Chiquette, J & Matte, JJ (1994) Concentrations of folates in ruminal content of steers – responses to a dietary-supplement of folic-acid in relation with the nature of the diet. J Anim Sci 72, 10231028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Santschi, DE, Chiquette, J, Berthiaume, R, Martineau, R, Matte, JJ, Mustafa, AF & Girard, CL (2005) Effects of the forage to concentrate ratio on B-vitamin concentrations in different ruminal fractions of dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci 85, 389399.Google Scholar
36Hall, G, Cheng, EW & Burroughs, W (1955) B-vitamins stimulatory to cellulose digestion by washed suspensions of rumen microorganisms. Proc Iowa Acad Sci 62, 273278.Google Scholar
37Ayers, WA (1958) Nutrition and physiology of Ruminococcus flavefaciens. J Bacteriol 76, 504509.Google Scholar
38Slyter, LL & Weaver, JM (1977) Tetrahydrofolate and other growth requirements of certain strains of Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Appl Environ Microbiol 33, 363369.Google Scholar
39Scott, HW & Dehority, BA (1965) Vitamin requirements of several cellulolytic rumen bacteria. J Bacteriol 89, 11691175.Google Scholar
40Bryant, MP & Robinson, IM (1961) Some nutritional requirements of genus Ruminococcus. J Appl Microbiol 9, 9195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Miyazaki, K, Hino, T & Itabashi, H (1992) Effects of extracellular pH on the intracellular pH and membrane-potential of cellulolytic ruminal bacteria, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Fibrobacter succinogenes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 38, 567573.Google Scholar
42Chiquette, J, Girard, CL & Matte, JJ (1993) Effect of diet and folic-acid addition on digestibility and ruminal fermentation in growing steers. J Anim Sci 71, 27932798.Google Scholar
43Santschi, DE, Berthiaume, R, Matte, JJ, Mustafa, AF & Girard, CL (2005) Fate of supplementary B-vitamins in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 88, 20432054.Google Scholar
44Schwab, EC, Schwab, CG, Shaver, RD, Girard, CL, Putnam, DE & Whitehouse, NL (2006) Dietary forage and nonfiber carbohydrate contents influence B-vitamin intake, duodenal flow, and apparent ruminal synthesis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 89, 174187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Girard, CL, Lapierre, H, Desrochers, A, Benchaar, C, Matte, JJ & Remond, D (2001) Net flux of folates and vitamin B12 through the gastrointestinal tract and the liver of lactating dairy cows. Br J Nutr 86, 707715.Google Scholar
46Girard, CL & Remond, D (2003) Net flux of folates and vitamin B12 through the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Can J Anim Sci 83, 273278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Zettner, A, Boss, GR & Seegmiller, JE (1981) A long-term study of the absorption of large oral doses of folic-acid. Ann Clin Lab Sci 11, 516524.Google ScholarPubMed
48Graulet, B, Matte, J, Desrochers, A, Doepel, L, Palin, M & Girard, C (2007) Effects of dietary supplements of folic acid and vitamin B12 on metabolism of dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 90, 34423455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Girard, CL & Matte, JJ (1999) Changes in serum concentrations of folates, pyridoxal, pyridoxal-5-phosphate and vitamin B12 during lactation of dairy cows fed dietary supplements of folic acid. Can J Anim Sci 79, 107113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Girard, CL, Matte, JJ & Tremblay, GF (1989) Serum folates in gestating and lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 72, 32403246.Google Scholar
51Girard, CL, Matte, JJ & Levesque, J (1992) Responses of serum folates of preruminant and ruminant calves to a dietary supplement of folic acid. J Anim Sci 70, 28472851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Girard, CL & Matte, JJ (1998) Dietary supplements of folic acid during lactation: effects on the performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 81, 14121419.Google Scholar
53Girard, CL, Lapierre, H, Matte, JJ & Lobley, GE (2005) Effects of dietary supplements of folic acid and rumen-protected methionine on lactational performance and folate metabolism of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 88, 660670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Girard, CL, Matte, JJ & Tremblay, GF (1995) Gestation and lactation of dairy cows – a role for folic acid. J Dairy Sci 78, 404411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Bills, ND, Koury, MJ, Clifford, AJ & Dessypris, EN (1992) Ineffective hematopoiesis in folate-deficient mice. Blood 79, 22732280.Google Scholar
56Wigertz, K & Jägerstad, M (1995) Comparison of a HPLC and radioprotein-binding assay for the determination of folates in milk and blood samples. Food Chem 54, 429436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Kirksey, A (1986) Effects of vitamin supplementation on vitamin levels in human milk: vitamin B6, vitamin C and folacin. Human lactation. 2. Maternal and environmental factors. In Proceedings of an International Workshop on Maternal Environmental Factors in Human Lactation, pp. 339348 [Hamosh, M and Goldman, A, editors]. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Anonymous (2005) Anlage 3 Zusatzstoffliste. Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1831/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 22. September 2003 über Zusatzstoffe zur Verwendung in der Tierernährung (Plant 3 Additive List. Regulation (EEC) no. 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and Advice from 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in Animal Nutrition)..Google Scholar
59Anonymous (1996) Novus Raw Material Compendium, 2nd ed.Brussels: Novus International.Google Scholar
60National Research Council (1998) Composition of feed ingredients. In Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 10th revised ed., pp. 130131Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
61Souci, S, Fachmann, W & Kraut, H (2000) Food Composition and Nutrition Tables, 6th ed.Stuttgart: Medpharm Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
62Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL) (2004) Gruber Tabelle zur Fütterung der Milchkühe, Zuchtrinder, Mastrinder, Schafe, Ziegen (Gruber Table for Feeding Dairy Cows, Breeding Cattle, Fattening Cattle, Sheep, Goats), vol.25, p. 36. Freising: LfL.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Folate content of several feeds given in the literature

Figure 1

Table 2 Folate content of ruminal material and body weight (BW) (at the beginning of the trial) of steers and cows(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 2

Table 3 Folate intake, duodenal flow, ileal flow, apparent synthesis (AS) and body weight (at the beginning of the trial) of steers and cows(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 3

Table 4 Average serum folate concentration (ng/ml) of cows with and without dietary supplementation of folic acid(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Serum folate concentration of cows fed different daily folic acid supplements (according to Girard & Matte(49), modified). (–♦–), Unsupplemented; (–□–), 2 mg folic acid/kg body weight; (–▲–), 4 mg folic acid/kg body weight.

Figure 5

Table 5 Influence of oral folic acid supplementation on milk production and composition(Mean values and standard errors)