Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T16:43:25.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of the β-agonist, cimaterol, on growth, body composition and energy expenditure in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. D. Sainz  and
J. E. Wolff
R. D. Sainz
Affiliation:
Growth Physiology Group, Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries, Hamilton, New Zealand
J. E. Wolff
Affiliation:
Growth Physiology Group, Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries, Hamilton, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 146·5 (se 4·3)g were fed on a semi-synthetic diet containing 0, 25 or 150 mg cimaterol/kg for 12 d. Net changes in weight and composition of carcass, liver, heart, gastrointestinal tract, gastrocnemius plus plantaris muscles, skin and remainder were estimated by comparative slaughter.

2. Cimaterol increased protein gains in gastrocnemius plus plantaris muscles from 0·09 g in controls to 0·14 and 0·12 g in 25 and 150 mg cimaterol/kg groups respectively. Carcass protein gains increased from 6·27 g in controls to 8·00 and 7·05 g in 25 and 150 mg cimaterol/kg groups respectively.

3. Rats treated with cimaterol either gained less fat or actually lost fat from all tissues studied, whilst control rats gained fat. These changes were reflected in lower energy retention in cimaterol-fed rats.

4. Energy intake was not affected by treatment. Cimaterol increased heat production from 776 kJ/kg body-weight0·75 in controls to 863 kJ/kg body-weight0·75 in both treated groups. Gross efficiency was reduced from 17·4% in controls to 8·0 and 7·7% in rats fed on 25 and 150 mg cimaterol/kg diets respectively.

5. These results indicate that cimaterol increases protein gain at the expense of fat in rats. In addition, subcutaneous adipose tissue appears to be more sensitive than abdominal fat, whilst protein gains are particularly enhanced in skeletal muscle relative to other body tissues.

Type
General Nutrition Papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , July 1988 , pp. 85 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Asato, G., Baker, P. K., Bass, R. T., Bentley, T. J., Chari, S., Dalrymple, R. H., France, D. J., Gingher, P. E., Lences, B. L., Pascavage, J. J., Pensack, J. M. & Ricks, C. A. (1984). Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 48, 2883–2888.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. B., Kitts, W. D. & Wood, A. J. (1960). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 40, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. K., Dalrymple, R. H., Ingle, D. L. & Ricks, C. A. (1984). Journal of Animal Science 59, 1256–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohorov, O., Buttery, P. J., Correia, J. H. R. D. & Soar, J. B. (1987). British Journal of Nutrition 57, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, R. H., Baker, P. K., Gingher, P. E., Ingle, D. L., Pensack, J. M. & Ricks, C. A. (1984). Poultry Science 63, 2376–2383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, P. W., Rothwell, N. J., Stock, M. J. & Winter, P. D. (1984). Bioscience Reports 4, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. A. C. & Treloar, B. P. (1981). Journal of Nutrition 111, 1797–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. W., Easter, R. A., McKeith, F. K., Dalrymple, R. H., Maddock, H. M. & Bechtel, P. J. (1985). Journal of Animal Science 61, 905–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1961). The Fire of Life. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mendez, J. (1966). Journal of Nutrition 89, 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeds, P. J., Hay, S. M., Dorwood, P. M. & Palmer, R. M. (1986). British Journal of Nutrition 56, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricks, C. A., Dalrymple, R. H., Baker, P. K. & Ingle, D. L. (1984). Journal of Animal Science 59, 1247–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, N. J. & Stock, M. J. (1985). Bioscience Reports 5, 755–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, N. J., Stock, M. J. & Winter, P. D. O'B. (1984). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 71A.Google Scholar
Sainz, R. D. & Wolff, J. E. (1987). In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores, pp. 153–154. Brisbane: Australian Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1981). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Suzuki, H., Goshi, H. & Sugisawa, H. (1975). Journal of Nutrition 105, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R. F., Tume, R. K., Payne, G., Larsen, T. W., Johnson, G. W. & Hohenhaus, M. A. (1985). Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45, 97–101.Google Scholar
Williams, P. E. V., Pagliani, L. & Innes, G. M. (1986). Livestock Production Science 15, 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. E., Dalrymple, R. H. & Ingle, D. L. (1987). In Proceedings of the 4th Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Animal Science Congress, p. 490. Hamilton, New Zealand: AAAP Organising Committee.Google Scholar