Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T02:56:30.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect on chick growth of inactivated penicillin, mineral sulphates or furazolidone supplements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. E. Coates  and
G. F. Harrison
M. E. Coates
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
G. F. Harrison
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1959 , pp. 345 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1959

References

Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G., Rook, J. A. F. & Rowell, J. G. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, L. R., Hamilton, C. M. & Bearse, G. E. (1956). Poult. Sci. 35, 876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R., Kon, S. K. & Porter, J. W. G. (1953). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 23, 473.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G., Barber, R. S. & Allen, M. M. (1957). Rep. nut. Inst. Dairy., Reading, p. 31.Google Scholar
Coates, M. E., Davies, M. K. & Harrison, G. F. (1956). Rep. nat. Inst. Dairy., Reading, p. 110.Google Scholar
Coates, M. E., Dickinson, C. D., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K., Porter, J. W. G., Cummins, S. H. & Cuthbertson, W. F. J. (1952). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 3, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elam, J. F., Gee, L. L. & Couch, J. R. (1951). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. N.Y., 78, 832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, R. V. & Stephenson, E. L. (1953). Poult. Sci. 32, 1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, D. W. & Schaffner, C. S. (1956). Poult. Sci. 35, 1371.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. S. & Sizer, I. W. (1955). Science, 122, 1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, R. L., Elam, J. F., Anderson, G. W., Gee, L. L., Fowler, J. & Couch, J. R. (1953). J. Nutr. 51, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowsey, J. R., Cook, F. D., Macgregor, H. I. & Blakely, R. M. (1957). Nature, Lond., 180, 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jukes, T. H. (1956). Fed. Proc. 15, 559.Google Scholar
Libby, D. A. & Schaible, P. J. (1955). Quart. Bull. Mich. agric. Exp. Sta. 38, 241.Google Scholar
Machlin, J. J. & Pearson, P. B. (1956). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N. Y., 93, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellen, W. J. & Waller, E. F. (1954). Poult. Sci. 33, 1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. H. (1957). Vet. Rec. 69, 278.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. H. & Gordon, W. S. (1955). Nature, Lond., 176, 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, A., Heyl, W., Büechl, H. & Holthoff, H. J. (1955). ArzneimForsch. 5, 702.Google Scholar
Wacker, A., Heyl, W., Büechl, H. & Holthoff, H. J. (1956). ArzneimForsch. 6, 712.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. E. & du Vigneaud, V. (1948). Science, 107, 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. E. & du Vigneaud, V. (1950). J. biol. Chem. 184, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar