Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T01:59:08.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of tertiary branched-chain carboxylic acids on the energy metabolism of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. L. Clapperton  and
J. W. Czerkawski
J. L. Clapperton
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
J. W. Czerkawski
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The introduction of certain tertiary branched-chain carboxylic acids into the rumen of sheep, either by continuous infusion or by direct incorporation of the acids in the concentrate food mixture, had no effect on the oxygen consumption or carbon dioxide production of the sheep. Methane production was depressed, the extent of the depression increasing with the molecular weight of the carboxylic acid.

2. There was a small decrease in the apparent digestibility of the food and a small increase in urinary energy output.

3. There was no significant increase in the metabolizable energy intake of the sheep. There was, however, a small increase in the amount of energy stored in the body. This small increase was about 84 % of the gross energy of the branched-chain acids added.

4. It is concluded that any practical advantage to be gained from the addition of branched-chain carboxylic acids to the diet of ruminants remains unproven.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , November 1971 , pp. 459 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 511.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Czerkawski, J. W. (1966). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 17, 417.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 411.Google Scholar
Clapperton, J. L. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 57A.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966 a). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 349.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966 b). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 485.Google Scholar
Garton, G. A. (1965). In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant p. 390 [Dougherty, R. W. editor]. Washington: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Blaxter, K. L. & Armstrong, D. G. (1958). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 8, p. 157.Google Scholar
Hodgman, C. D. (editor) (1962). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 44th ed. p. 1926. Cleveland, Ohio: Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1958). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 8, p. 85.Google Scholar