Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:34:54.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of meal composition on the degree of satiation following a test meal and possible mechanisms involved

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Christopher J. I. Driver
Christopher J. I. Driver
Affiliation:
Department of Science, Victoria College, Rusden Campus, 662 Blackburn Rd, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Possible links between metabolism and satiation were investigated using volunteer subjects given test meals based on milk solids. Satisfaction was rated by the subjects on a six-point scale and the course of metabolism was followed by measurement of the respiratory quotient (RQ).

2. The time-course of satiation was the same for a high-carbohydrate, a high-fat and a high-protein meal, in spite of the very different time-course of metabolism. The degree of satiation was reduced by added sodium chloride, without affecting the RQ rise. On the other hand, calcium chloride produced a suppression of the RQ rise without altering the satiation.

3. It is proposed that the results indicate that the primary receptors responsible for post-prandial satiation lie within the gut wall and that there is probably a number of receptor types. Likely candidates for these receptors are the gut hormone-secreting cells.

4. Although very-low-protein meals produce less satiation than meals containing 220 g protein/kg dry weight, there is no additional satiation obtained by increasing the protein level further. This is not inconsistent with the possibility of a protein hunger separate from an energy hunger.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition papers: Studies in Man
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , November 1988 , pp. 441 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Almquist, H. J. (1954) Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 52, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. H., Leprohohn, C., Chambers, J. W. & Coscina, D. V. (1979) Physiology and Behaviour 23, 751–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, D. V. M. & Anderson, G. H. (1977) Federation Proceedings 36, 4665.Google Scholar
Bernstein, I. L. & Goehler, L. E. (1983) Behavioural Neuroscience 97, 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. A. (1972) Physiology and Behaviour 9, 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, G. (1975). In Appetite and Food Intake, pp. 141–150 [Silverstone, T., editor]. Berlin: Dahlem Konferenzen.Google Scholar
Deutsch, J. A. & Gonzalez, M. F. (1980) Behaviour and Neural Biology 30, 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, J. A. & Hardy, W. T. (1977) Nature 266, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, T. & Kobayashi, S. (1981). In Gut Hormones, 2nd ed, pp. 90–101 [Bloom, S.R. and Polak, J. M., editors]. Edinburgh, London, Melbourne and New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J., Young, R. & Smith, G. P. (1973) Nature 245, 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A. J. & Blundell, J. E. (1986). Nutrition and Behaviour 3(2), 133–144.Google Scholar
Houpt, T. R. (1983). In Physiology Digestif Chez le Porc, p. 17 [Laplace, J.P., Corring, T. and Rérat, A., editors]. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
Koopmans, H. S. (1981). In Gut Hormones, 2nd ed., pp. 464–470 [Bloom, S.R. and Polak, J. M., editors]. Edinburgh, London, Melbourne and New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Kraly, F. S. (1981) Physiology and Behaviour 27, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Magnen, J. (1985). Hunger, pp. 83–95. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Louis-Sylvestre, J., Servant, J. M., Molimard, R. & Le Magnen, L. (1980) American Journal of Physiology 239, R66–R70.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. (1955) Annals of the New York Academy of Science 63, 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novin, D. (1983) Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System 9, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novin, D., Sanderson, J. & Gonzalez, M. (1979) Physiology and Behaviour 22, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russek, M. (1970) Physiology and Behaviour 5, 1207–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, I., Martinuik, E. & Grossman, M. I. (1952) American Journal of Physiology 169, 229.Google Scholar
Smith, G. P. & Gibbs, J. (1975). In Appetite and Food Intake, pp. 129–138 [Silverstone, T., editor]. Berlin: Dahlem Konferenzen.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, N. R., Van Der Kooy, D., Koob, G. F. & Wenger, J. R. (1983) Life Sciences 32, 2087–2094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurtman, J. J. & Wurtman, R. J. (1979) Life Sciences 24, 895–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar