Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T16:08:32.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of level of food intake on the incorporation of acetate into lipids and its distribution among various tissues in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

T. E. Broad
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division, DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
M. J. Ulyatt
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division, DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Romney wethers were infused intravenously with [2-14C]acetate for 5 d during which time they were given, three/group, different amounts of lucerne(Medicago sativa L.) chaff. The groups and the amounts fed were: MS, 700 g but starved during the infusion period; M, 700 g throughout; 1.3 M, 950 g throughout; AL, ad lib. throughout.

2. On day 4 of the infusion, the oxygen consumption, and production rate of expired 14CO2 were measured. At the end of the infusion, the sheep were killed and the amounts of radioactivity in the lipids of various tissues wre determined.

3. Significant differences were present between the specific activities of the tissues. The internal adipose tissues generally had higher specific activities than subcutaneous or intermuscular adipose depots. Although the intramuscular lipid also was highly labelled, the liver had the greatest specific activity.

4. Food intake did not significantly affect this pattern of specific activity of labelling of the tissues.

5. While most of the total lipid radioactivity was present in adipose tissues, the proportion in the liver increased to 40% during starvation.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 2, Ruminants. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ballard, F. J., Hanson, R. W. & Kronfeld, D. S. (1969). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 28, 218.Google Scholar
Baurnan, D. E. (1976). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 35, 2308.Google Scholar
Bergman, E. N. & Wolff, J. E. (1971). Am. J. Physiol. 221, 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, T. E. & Davies, A. S. (1980). Anim. Prod. (In the Press).Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (1973). In Form and Function of Phospholipids, p. 345 [Ansell, G. B., Hawthorne, J. N. and Dawson, R. M. C., editors]. Amsterdam-London-New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. F. (1974). Farm Fd Res. 5, 41.Google Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane Stanley, G. H. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourie, P. D., Kirton, A. H. & Jury, K. E. (1970). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 13, 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, H. & Kehinde, O. (1974). Cell 1, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausberger, F. X. (1965). In Handbook of Physiology, Section 5, Adipose Tissue, p. 519. [Renold, A. E. and Cahill, G.F. Jr, editors]. Washington, DC: Waverly Press Inc.Google Scholar
Ingle, D. L., Bauman, D. E. & Garrigus, U. S. (1972). J. Nutr. 102, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannan, R., Palmquist, D. L. & Baker, N. (1976). Biochim. biophys. Acta 431, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsholme, E. A. & Start, C. (1973). Regulation in Metabolism, ch. 5. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Prior, R. L. (1978). J. Nutr. 108, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Dellow, D. W., Egan, A. R. & Walker, D. J. (1973). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 33, 149.Google Scholar
Wright, D. E., Payne, E. & Kirton, A. H. (1974). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 17, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar