Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T14:56:18.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of different levels of wheat bran on iron absorption in rats from bread containing similar amounts of phytate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

S. J. Fairweather-Tait
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Iron absorption was studied in weanling rats using balance techniques from semi-synthetic diets containing dried white bread (60·5 g dietary fibre/kg, White & Southgate, unpublished results), brown bread (130·2 g dietary fibre/kg) or wholemeal bread (221·2 g dietary fibre/kg) at a level of 300 g/kg and compared with a control group given a diet containing added FeSO4 at a similar Fe level to that for the bread groups. The dried bread contained 6·2–6·4 g phytate/kg.

2. Absorption of Fe was significantly higher (P < 0·001) in the control group (0·45) than in the white (0·28), brown (0·31) or wholemeal (0·24) groups.

3. A second experiment was carried out on 6-week-old rats in which the dried bread was extrinsically labelled with 59Fe and absorption from a single meal measured by both faecal excretion and incorporation of 59Fe into the blood. Control animals were given 59FeSO4 for comparison.

4. The excretion of 59Fe (% of administered dose) was significantly lower (P < 0·001) in the control group (31) than in the white (48), brown (45) or wholemeal (47) groups. After 10 d the control group had significantly more 59Fe in the blood than the bread groups, but there were no differences between the bread groups.

5. It appears that wheat bran fibre itself has no effect on the retention of Fe from the diet in the rat, when supplied in amounts similar to those found in commercially-available bread.

Type
Papers of direct reference to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

Björn-Rasmussen, E. (1974). Nutr. Metab. 16, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, S. T. & Warner, G. T. (1970). Lancet i, 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, J. W., Esfahani, M., Salji, J. P. & Azzam, S. A. (1966). J. Nutr. 90, 423.Google Scholar
Davies, N. T. & Nightingale, R. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 243.Google Scholar
Davies, N. T. & Reid, H. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 579.Google Scholar
Huang, K. & Bondurant, J. H. (1956). Am. J. Physiol. 185, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail-Beigi, F., Faradji, B. & Reinhold, J. G. (1977). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 30, 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, D. J. A., Hill, M. S. & Cummings, J. H. (1975). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 28, 1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A., Edgecombe, C. N. & Widdowson, E. M. (1943). Lancet ii, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, E. R. & Ellis, R. (1980). J. Nutr. 110, 2000.Google Scholar
Ranhotra, G. S., Lee, C. & Gelroth, J. A. (1979). Nutr. Rep. int. 17, 851.Google Scholar
Ranhotra, G. S., Loewe, R. J. & Puyat, L. V. (1974). Cereal Chem. 51, 323.Google Scholar
Reinhold, J. G., Ismail-Beigi, F. & Faradji, B. (1975). Nutr. Rep. int. 12, 75.Google Scholar
Reinhold, J. G., Nasr, K., Lahimgar Zadeh, A. & Hedayati, H. (1973). Lancet i, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandstead, H. H., Mŭnoz, J. M., Jacob, R. A., Klevay, L. M., Reck, S. J., Logan, G. M. Jnr, Dintzis, F. R., Inglett, G. E. & Shuey, W. C. (1978). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 31, 5180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1969). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 20, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, R. C. Y. & Lei, K. Y. (1979). J. Nutr. 109, 1117.Google Scholar
Vohra, P., Gray, G. A. & Kratzer, F. H. (1965). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 120, 447.Google Scholar
Walker, A. R. P., Fox, F. W. & Irving, J. T. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & McCance, R. A. (1942). Lancet i, 588.Google Scholar