Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T08:23:22.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early life undernutrition in rats

2. Some contractile properties of skeletal muscles from adult animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2009

A. C. Wareham
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT
M. Mahon
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT
K.S Bedi
Affiliation:
Department of Child Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT
J. L. Smart
Affiliation:
Department of Child Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The contractile properties of soleus and extensor digitorum longus muscles from animals at 12 months of age whose mothers had been undernourished during pregnancy and lactation (PU rats) have been compared with those of muscles from age-matched controls.

2. Body-weight and muscle wet weight of PU rats was significantly reduced. Muscle: body-weight values were, however, no different from controls.

3. No significant alterations in whole muscle speeds of contraction or relaxation could be delected when compared with those of age-matched controls.

4. Twitch and tetanic forces of both SOL and EDL were greater per unit weight of muscle in PU rats. Apart from SOL twitch these differences were significant. The tetanus:twitch values were, however, not different.

Type
Papers of direct reference to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

Barany, M. & Close, R. I. (1971). J. Physiol., Lond. 213, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedi, K. S., Birzgalis, A. R., Mahon, M., Smart, J. L. & Wareham, A. C. (1982). Br. J. Nutr. 47, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. C., Jansen, J. K. S. & Van Essen, D. (1976). J. Physiol., Lond. 261, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, A. J., Eccles, J. C. & Eccles, R. M. (1960). J. Physiol., Lond. 150, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, R. (1965). Nature, Lond. 206, 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, R. (1969). J. Physiol., Lond. 204, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, R. (1972). Physiol. Rev. 52, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbing, J. & Smart, J. L. (1974). Br. Med. Bull. 30, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. C., Eccles, R. M. & Kozak, W. (1962). J. Physiol., Lond. 163, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldspink, D. F. (1977). J. Physiol., Lond. 264, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldspink, G. (1962). Comp. Bioch. Physiol. 7, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldspink, G. (1962). Am. J. Physiol. 209, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldspink, G. & Ward, P. S. (1979). J. Physiol., Lond. 296, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, E., Melichna, J. & Syrovy, I. (1974). Physiol. Bohemoslav. 23, 19.Google Scholar
Haltia, M., Berlin, O., Schucht, H. & Sourander, P. (1978). J. Neurol. Sci. 36, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, K. F., Matthews, D. R. & Jordan, T. C. (1978). Res. Exp. Med. 173, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, G. (1980). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 66A, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulieri, L. A. (1972). J. Physiol., Lond. 223, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D. A. (1977). Brain Res. 134, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandow, A. (1966). M.C.V. Quarterly 2, 82.Google Scholar
Sandow, A., Pagala, M. K. D. & Sphicas, E. (1975). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 404, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafiq, S. A., Asiedu, S. A. & Milhorat, A. T. (1972). Exp. Neurol. 35, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sourander, P., Sima, A. & Haltia, M. (1974). Early Malnutrition and Neonatal Development (Symposium of Swedish Nutritional Foundation XII). p. 39. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. M., Bedi, K. S., Davies, C. A. & Dobbing, J. (1979). Early Human Develop. 3, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar