Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T05:37:59.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The course of digestion of different food proteins in the rat

2*. The effect of feeding carbohydrate with proteins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. Buraczewski
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
J. W. G. Porter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
B. A. Rolls
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
Teresa Zebrowska
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9 AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Single meals of protein (24.3 mg nitrogen/100 g body-weight) were fed with and without carbohydrate (167 mg/100 g body-weight) to groups of rats kept in anticoprophagy cages after an 18 h fast. The contents of the gastro-intestinal tract were collected and analysed and the rises in plasma amino acid concentrations were also determined.

2. After ingestion of different proteins with sucrose, the passage of protein from the stomach was delayed compared with that when the meal was of protein alone: the initial stomach emptying was little affected by the nature of the protein in the diet, but subsequently the relative rates of evacuation of different proteins were similar to those when the proteins were given alone.

3. When proteins were given with different carbohydrates the subsequent digestion and absorption of the meal was modified in a way which could be explained by the observed properties of the carbohydrates given alone, particularly with regard to solubilization in the stomach.

4. The rises in concentration of plasma free amino acid were lower after ingestion of proteins with carbohydrate than when the proteins were eaten alone, and different carbohydrates affected these rises to different degrees.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

Chang, V. (1962). J. Nutr. 78, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, R. & Holdsworth, E. S. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, R. & Porter, J. W. G. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, C. E. & Schilling, J. A. (1949). Biochem. J. 44, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreisbach, L. & Nasset, E. S. (1954). J. Nutr. 53, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggenheim, K., Halevy, S. & Friedmann, N. (1960). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 91, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankes, L. V., Henderson, L. M., Brickson, W. L. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1948). J. biol. Chem. 174, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. E. & Katayama, M. C. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. E., Katayama, M. C. & Jelinek, B. (1952). Can. J. med. Sci. 30, 578.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. M., Deodhar, T., Krehl, W. A. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1947). J. biol. Chem. 170, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S., Spackman, D. H. & Stein, W. H. (1958). Analyt. Chem. 30, 1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peraino, C., Rogers, Q. R., Yoshida, M., Chen, M.-L. & Harper, A. E. (1959). Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Register, U. D. & Peterson, E. W. (1958). J. Nutr. 64, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Q. R. & Harper, A. E. (1966). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 6, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. & Nasset, E. S. (1958). J. Nutr. 66, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H. & Moore, S. (1958). Analyt. Chem. 30, 1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, H. E., Katayama, M. C., Yoshida, M. & Harper, A. E. (1958). Am. J. Physiol. 193, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebrowska, T. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar