Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:22:14.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the dye-binding and fluorodinitrobenzene methods for determining reactive lysine in leaf-protein concentrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Ann F. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Reading, London Road, ReadingRGi 5AQ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Twenty-eight leaf-protein concentrate (LPC) samples, subjected to different thermal treatments, were produced from five curd batches. For these samples, the fluorodinitrobenzene (FDNB)-reactive lysine values gave closer agreement with dye-binding lysine (DBL) than with the dye-binding capacity (DBC).

2. No relationship was established between the dye-bound-after-propionylation (DBAP) and the histidine+arginine value.

3. Comparison of dye-bound-protein values with those for tungstic-acid-precipitated nitrogen ×6.25 for the LPC samples showed the heat-damaged samples to lie below the regression line for the other samples.

4. Reactive-lysine values by dye-binding and by FDNB methods correlated well with total lysine, but the slopes of the regression line indicated closer agreement for values for samples not damaged by heat.

5. The correlation coefficients between DBC and total basic amino acids, DBC and histidine+arginine+DBL, and DBC and histidine+arginine+FDNB-reactive lysine were similar.

6. There was no correlation between the lightness of colour of the LPC samples and the availability of lysine.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Allison, R. M., Laird, W. M. & Synge, R. L. M. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 29, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickoff, E. M., Booth, A. N., de Fremery, D., Edwards, R. H., Knuckles, B. E., Miller, R. E., Saunders, R. M. & Kohler, G. O. (1975). In Protein Nufrifional Qualify of Foods and Feeds, part 2, p. 319 [Friedman, M., editor]. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Boctor, A. M. & Harper, A. E. (1968). J. Nufr. 94, 289.Google Scholar
Booth, V. H. (1971). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 22, 658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, W. J. & Hurnphries, C. (1978). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 29, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, M. (1971). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 22, 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. (1960). Biochem. J. 77, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. & Woodham, A. A. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranwell, P. A. & Haworth, R. D. (1971). Tetrahedron 27, 1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davys, M. N. G. & Pirie, N. W. (1960). Engineering 190, 274.Google Scholar
Davys, M. N. G. & Pirie, N. W. (1965). J. agric. Engng Res. 10, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H. (1974). In Nutrienrs in Processed Foods – Proteins, p. 77. [White, P. L. and Fletcher, D. C., editors]. Acton, Massachusetts: Publishing Sciences Group Inc.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, K. M. (1964). Proc. 6th int. Nutr. Congr. 1963 p. 492.Google Scholar
Henry, K. M. & Ford, J. E. (1965). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, R. F. & Carpenter, K. J. (1975). Br. J. Nurr. 33, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, R. F. & Carpenter, K. J. (1976). Proc. Nurr. Soc. 35, 23A.Google Scholar
Hurrell, R. F. & Carpenter, K. J. (1978). J. Agric. Fd Chem. 26, 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, R. F., Carpenter, K. J., Sinclair, W. J., Otterburn, M. S. & Asquith, R. S. (1976). Br. J. Nirtr. 35, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokinen, J. E. & Reineccius, G. A. (1976). J. Fd Sci. 41, 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, C. H. & Hannan, R. S. (1950). Biochim. biophys. Acta 5, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossberg, R. (1966). Agric. hort. Genet. 24, 193.Google Scholar
Perry, D. R. & Adam, W. A. (1971). Biochem. J. 125, 29 P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, N. W. (1971) (editor). Leaf Protein: its Agrononry, Preparation, Qualiry and Use. I.B.P. Handbook no. 20. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Roach, A. G., Sanderson, P. & Williams, D. R. (1967). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 18, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shurpalekar, K. S., Singh, N. & Sundaravalli, O. E. (1966). Proc. 7th int. Nutr. Congr. 3, 285.Google Scholar
Walker, A. F. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar