Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T21:54:38.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Musical Analysis: Back to Basics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Abstract

The traditional basics of elementary education – the three R's: Reading, Writing and Arithmetic – whilst problematic, not least in the poverty of alliteration involved, are seriously limiting in the promotion of technique at the expense of creative thinking. There appears to be a corresponding situation with current trends in musical analysis. Here, events have moved a notch further with the three S's: Schenker, Semiology and Set-Theory. No doubt the quality of alliteration has improved, but we should still be wary of adopting techniques which may be used as a substitute for the essential creative processes involved in coming to understand how music works. If a back to basics approach is seriously to be considered, then perhaps we should return to the three A's: Analysis, Awareness and Accessibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bent, I. (1987) Analysis (The New Grove Handbooks in Music). London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Cook, N. J. (1987) A Guide to Musical Analysis. London: DentGoogle Scholar
Dunsby, J. M. & Whittall, A. (1988) Music Analysis in Theory and Practice. London: Faber & FaberCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, T. (1989) Jean Sibelius: Progressive Techniques in the Symphonies and Tone-Poems. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Rosen, C. (1971) The Classical Style. New York: Viking/London: Faber & FaberGoogle Scholar