Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:07:08.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Music and Language: Commonalities in Semiotics, Syllabus, and Classroom Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Peter Dunbar-Hall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Music and language are often seen to be similar, and this has led to numerous music education methods based on language models. This paper describes a commonality between music and language at a semiotic level, compares their relevant syllabuses, and discusses a number of possible transfers between language teaching and music education.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 65 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. (1976) Psycholinguistic Experiments in Foreign Language Testing. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. (1990) Music and language in education. British Journal of Music Education 7, 1, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R. (1977) Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bent, I. & Drabkin, W. (1987) Analysis. London: Macmillan.Google ScholarPubMed
Byrne, D. (1981) Integrating skills. In Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. (Eds), Communication in the Classroom, pp. 108–14. Burnt Mill, Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Cope, B. (1988) Facing the Challenge of Back to Basics: an historical perspective. Sydney: Common Ground.Google Scholar
Cope, B. (1986) Traditional Versus Progressivist Pedagogy. Sydney: Common Ground.Google Scholar
Dunbar-Hall, P. (1984) The language of music: a new approach to intensive English. Education News 18, 8, 36–7.Google Scholar
Dunsby, J. & Whittall, A. (1988) Music Analysis in Theory and Practice. London: Faber and Faber.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, U. (1979) A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fokkema, D. & Ibsch, E. (1978) Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century: Structuralism, Marixism, Aesthetics of Reception, Semiotics. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Geddes, M. (1981) Listening. In Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. (Eds), op. cit., pp. 78–86.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1975) Learning How to Mean – Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hawkes, T. (1977) Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. (Eds) (1981) Communication in the Classroom. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jordan-DeCarbo, J. (1986) A sound-to-symbol approach to learning music. Music Educators Journal 72, 6, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. (1980) The Talent Education School of Shinichi Suzuki: an analysis, n.p.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (1967) Music, the Arts, and Ideas: patterns and predictions in twentieth-century culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nattiez, J. (1982) ‘Density 21.5’ by Varese, . Music Analysis 1, 243–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, C. (1982) Deconstruction: theory and practice. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noske, F. (1977) The Signifier and the Signified: studies in the operas of Verdi and Mozart. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C. & Rubin, L. (1966) Process as Content: curriculum design and the application of knowledge. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Pople, A. (1983) Skriabin's Prelude Op. 67, No 1: sets and structures. Music Analysis 2, 151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, B. (1970) A Philosophy of Music Education. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Stowasser, H. (1989) Discover Music Making (outline accompanying text). Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
Tarasti, E. (1979) Myth and Music: a semiotic approach to the aesthetics of myth in music, especially that of Wagner, Sibelius, and Stravinsky. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1980) Linguistics in Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wright, A. (1981) Visuals. In Johnson, K. & Morrow, K., op. cit., pp. 117–25.Google Scholar