No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Examining a collaborative community amongst music student teachers in Korea
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2022
Abstract
Teacher collaboration has been recognised as one of the most influential factors positively affecting school teaching practice. To add to the literature in this area, I investigated a collaborative community of Korean preservice music teachers. The results showed that the collaborative community was a place where these preservice music teachers were able to share their thoughts about their passion for music teaching and various philosophical issues closely related to the role of music in public education. In addition, the collaborative community played a role in helping preservice music teachers focus on the level of students’ current knowledge and understand the importance of instructional pacing. Finally, music student teachers freely and frequently expressed their worries and frustration about student teaching and gained emotional support from their peers.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
BARRET, J. R. (2014). Case study in music education. In Conway, C. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research in American Music Education (1st ed., pp. 113–132). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARRON, B. & DARLING-HAMMOND, L. (2008). Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. Powerful Learning: What We Know about Teaching for Understanding (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
BOND, N. (2013). Developing a professional learning community among preservice teachers. Current Issues in Education, 16, 1–14.Google Scholar
DRAVES, T. J. (2017). Collaborations that promote growth: music student teachers as peer mentors. Music Education Research, 19, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EOM, M. R. & UHM, J. Y. (2010). A survey on perception and needs for pre-service teachers before and after teaching practicum. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 17, 127–149.Google Scholar
GOODNOUGH, K. ET AL. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: Pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOODRICH, A., BUCURA, E. & STAUFFER, S. (2018). Peer mentoring in an university music methods class. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 27(2), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HARRIS, A. & JONES, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISMAIL, S. N., MUHAMMAD, F., KANESAN, A. G. & YAACOB, A. (2018). Teacher collaboration as a mediator for strategic leadership and teaching quality. International Journal of Instruction, 11, 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHN-STEINER, V. (2000). Creative Collaboration (1st ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
KILLIOM, J. (2015). High-quality collaboration benefits teachers and students. Journal of Staff Development, 36, 62–64.Google Scholar
LAMB, S., MAIRE, Q. & DOECKE, E. (2017). Key Skills for the 21st Century: An Evidence-Based Review (1st ed.). Sydney: NSW Department of Education.Google Scholar
LEE, S.-H. ET AL. (2015). The qualitative meta-analysis of attributes in teacher learning community. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 77–101.Google Scholar
LEE, W. (2016). Study on the process of student teaching in secondary schools: Application of mixed methods. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28, 225–255.Google Scholar
LEE, Y. S. & YIM, S. J. (2018). A study by the lesson study on early childhood science education cooperative mock class through preliminary early childhood teacher. Korean Journal of Children’s Media, 17(3), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NGUYEN, H. T. M. (2013). Peer mentoring: A way forward for supporting preservice Efl teachers psychosocially during the practicum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(7), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PATTON, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
RIGELMAN, N. M. & RUBEN, B. (2012). Creating foundations for collaboration in schools: Utilizing professional communities to support teacher candidate learning and visions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 979–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEO, K.-H. (2009). Teacher learning communities and professional development. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(2), 243–276.Google Scholar
SHIN, J. (2019). An investigation of preservice music teachers’ experience on microteaching: Focused on feedback and peer collaboration. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(1), 125–144.Google Scholar
SHULMAN, L. S. & SHULMAN, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SORENSEN, P. (2014). Collaboration, dialogue and expansive learning: The use of paired and multiple placements in the school practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THESSIN, R. A. & STAR, J. P. (2011). Supporting the growth of effective professional learning communities district wide. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VYGOTSKY, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Sociological Processes (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
WENGER, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (1st ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WENGER, E., MCDERMOTT, R. & SNYDER, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
YIN, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar