Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-mpvvr Total loading time: 0.359 Render date: 2021-08-03T02:40:35.231Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Educating good decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

Abstract

Can we educate decision-makers to make better decisions? In the present paper, I argue that we can in at least two broad ways: (1) teaching concrete knowledge about a specific decision or decision type; and (2) teaching more abstract decision-making competencies that are thought to lead to better decisions. Teaching knowledge can be done using decision aids and similar techniques that provide important information about a specific choice (e.g. a medical treatment option). In these cases, information presented using evidence-based techniques to improve comprehension and use of information will have greater effects on judgements and choices. Teaching more abstract decision competencies, on the other hand, involves formal schooling (with the bulk of formal education falling during childhood) or training in a specific competency that is important to decision processes and outcomes; I use numeracy interventions as an exemplar.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, C., Norman, P. and Conner, M. (2000), Understanding and changing health behaviour: From health beliefs to self-regulation, Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Annan, K. (1997), United Nations Press Release SG/SM/6268 23 June 1997 [29 November 2016].Google Scholar
Banks, J. and Oldfield, Z. (2007), ‘Understanding pensions: Cognitive function, numerical ability and retirement saving’, Fiscal Studies, 143170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. and Brown, R. V. (1991), Teaching decision making to adolescents, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Betz, N. E. and Hackett, G. (1983), ‘The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23(3): 329345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchette, I., Marzouki, Y., Claidière, N., Gullstrand, J. and Fagot, J. (2016), ‘Emotion-Cognition Interaction in Nonhuman Primates Cognitive Avoidance of Negative Stimuli in Baboons (Papio papio)’, Psychological Science, 0956797616671557.Google Scholar
Bosworth, H. B. (2012), ‘How can innovative uses of technology be harnessed to improve medication adherence?’, Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 12(2): 133135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosworth, H. B., Oddone, E. Z. and Weinberger, M. (eds), (2006), Patient treatment adherence: concepts, interventions, and measurement, Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Braddock III, C. H., Edwards, K. A., Hasenberg, N. M., Laidley, T. L. and Levinson, W. (1999), ‘Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics’, Jama, 282(24): 23132320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddock, C. H., Fihn, S. D., Levinson, W., Jonsen, A. R. and Pearlman, R. A. (1997), ‘How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions - Informed decision making in the outpatient setting’, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12(6): 339345.Google ScholarPubMed
Brewer, N. T., Hall, M. G., Noar, S. M., Parada, H., Stein-Seroussi, A., Bach, L. E., Hanley, S. and Ribisl, K. M. (2016), ‘Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial’, JAMA Internal Medicine. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2621 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brownell, K. D. and Cohen, L. R. (1995), ‘Adherence to dietary regimens 1: An overview of research’, Behavioral Medicine, 20(4): 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Cancer Society (2016), Cigarette Package Health Warnings: International Status Report, Fifth Edition. . [7 December 2016].Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, K., Huizinga, M. M., Wallston, K. A., Gebretsadik, T., Shintani, A., Davis, D., Gregory, R. P., Fuchs, L., Malone, R., Cherrington, A. and Pignone, M. (2008), ‘Association of numeracy and diabetes control’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(10): 737746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, J. T., Morton, S. C., Rubenstein, L. Z., Mojica, W. A., Maglione, M., Suttorp, M. J., Roth, E. A. and Shekelle, P. G. (2004), ‘Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials’, British Medical Journal, 328: 680–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesney, D. and Peters, E. (in review), The causal impact of numeracy on judgments: Improving numeracy via symbolic and non-symbolic arithmetic practice improves risky judgments.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N. and Master, A. (2006), ‘Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention’, Science, 313(5791): 13071310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dieckmann, N. F., Peters, E., Leon, J., Benavides, M., Baker, D. P. and Norris, A. (2015), ‘The role of numeracy and fluid intelligence in sex-related protective behaviors’, Current HIV Research, 13(5): 337346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillard, A. J., McCaul, K. D. and Klein, W. M. (2006), ‘Unrealistic optimism in smokers: Implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation’, Journal of Health Communication, 11(S1): 93102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estrada, C. A., Martin-Hryniewicz, M., Collins, C., Byrd, J. C. and Peek, B. T. (2004), ‘Literacy and numeracy skills and anticoagulation control’, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 328(2): 8893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, A. T., Peters, E., Strasser, A. A., Emery, L. F., Sheerin, K. M. and Romer, D. (2015), ‘Graphic Warning Labels Elicit Affective and Thoughtful Responses from Smokers: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial’, PloS One, 10(12): e0142879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Ubel, P. A., Jankovic, A., Derry, H. A. and Smith, D. M. (2007), ‘Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale’, Medical Decision Making, 27(5): 672680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H. and Nisbett, R. E. (1986), ‘The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems’, Cognitive Psychology, 18(3): 253292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, L., Matzko, C. K., Webb, D. E., Oppermann, B., Charpentier, P., Peters, E., Reyna, V. and Newman, E. D. (2015), ‘Use of decision support for improved knowledge, value clarification and informed choice in rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Care & Research, 67(11): 14961502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraenkel, L., Peters, E., Charpentier, P., Olson, B., Errante, L., Schoen, R. and Reyna, V. (2012), ‘A decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis’, Arthritis Care & Research, 64(7): 977985.Google ScholarPubMed
Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T. and Garcia-Retamero, R. (2014), ‘Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition’, Judgment and Decision Making, 9(1): 15.Google Scholar
Greene, J. and Hibbard, J. H. (2012), ‘Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes’, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(5): 520526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J., Hibbard, J. H., Sacks, R., Overton, V. and Parrotta, C. D. (2015), ‘When patient activation levels change, health outcomes and costs change, too’, Health Affairs, 34(3): 431437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackett, G., and Betz, N. E. (1981), ‘A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3): 326339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. C., Zhao, J. and Shafir, E. (2014), ‘Self-affirmation among the poor: Cognitive and behavioral implications’, Psychological Science, 25(2): 619625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heckman, J. J. (2007), ‘The economics, technology, and neuroscience of human capability formation’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(33): 1325013255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huizinga, M. M., Beech, B. M., Cavanaugh, K. L., Elasy, T. A. and Rothman, R. L. (2008), ‘Low numeracy skills are associated with higher BMI’, Obesity, 16(8): 19661968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jha, P., Ramasundarahettige, C., Landsman, V., Rostron, B., Thun, M., Anderson, R. N., McAfee, T. and Peto, R. (2013), ‘21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States’, New England Journal of Medicine, 368(4): 341350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kees, J., Burton, S., Andrews, J. C. and Kozup, J. (2010), ‘Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(2): 265276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenkel, D. S. and Chen, L. (2000), ‘Consumer information and tobacco use’, in Jha, P. and Chaloupka, F. J. (eds), Tobacco control in developing countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177214.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. D., Spafford, M. M., Parkinson, C. M. and Fong, G. T. (2011), ‘Knowledge about the relationship between smoking and blindness in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia: results from the International Tobacco Control Four-Country Project’, Optometry-Journal of the American Optometric Association, 82(5): 310317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logel, C., and Cohen, G. L. (2012), ‘The role of the self in physical health: Testing the effect of a values-affirmation intervention on weight loss’, Psychological Science, 23(1): 5355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. S. (2014), ‘The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence’, Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1): 544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L. and Ito, T. A. (2010), ‘Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation’, Science, 330(6008): 12341237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niederdeppe, J., Fiore, M. C., Baker, T. B. and Smith, S. S. (2008), ‘Smoking-cessation media campaigns and their effectiveness among socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged populations’, American Journal of Public Health, 98(5): 916924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, A. M., Stacey, D., Entwistle, V., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Rovner, D., Holmes-Rovner, M., Tait, V., Tetroe, J., Fiset, V., Barry, M. and Jones, J. (2003), ‘Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane Review)’, The Cochrane Library, 2.Google Scholar
O'Connor, A. M., Drake, E. R., Fiset, V., Graham, I. D., Laupacis, A. and Tugwell, P. (1998), ‘The Ottawa patient decision aids’, Effective Clinical Practice: ECP, 2(4): 163170.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, A. M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G. A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., McPherson, R., Bunn, H., Graham, I. and Drake, E. (1999), ‘A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation’, Patient Education and Counseling, 33(3): 267279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterberg, L. and Blaschke, T. (2005), ‘Adherence to medication’, New England Journal of Medicine, 353(5): 487497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, E. (2006), ‘The functions of affect in the construction of preferences’, in Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (eds), The Construction of Preferenc, New York: Cambridge University Press, 454463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. (2012), ‘Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1): 3135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Baker, D. P., Dieckmann, N. F., Leon, J. and Collins, J. (2010), ‘Explaining the effect of education on health a field study in Ghana’, Psychological science, 21(10): 13691376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Evans, A. T., Hemmerich, N. and Berman, M. (2016), ‘Emotion in the law and the lab: The case of graphic cigarette warnings’, Tobacco Regulatory Science, 2(4): 404413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, E., Meilleur, L. and Tompkins, M. K. (2014), ‘Numeracy and the Affordable Care Act: Opportunities and challenges. Appendix A. IOM (Institute of Medicine)’, in Health Literacy and Numeracy: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Peters, E., Romer, D., Slovic, P., Jamieson, K. H., Wharfield, L., Mertz, C. K. and Carpenter, S. M. (2007), ‘The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among US smokers and nonsmokers’, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9(4): 473481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Shoots-Reinhard, B., Tompkins, M. K., Schley, D., Meilleur, L., Sinayev, A., Tusler, M., Wagner, L. and Crocker, J. (in review), Improving numeracy enhances STEM and decision outcomes.Google Scholar
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K. and Dickert, S. (2006), ‘Numeracy and decision making’, Psychological Science, 17(5): 407413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrova, D. G., van der Pligt, J. and Garcia-Retamero, R. (2014), ‘Feeling the numbers: on the interplay between risk, affect, and numeracy’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3): 191199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M. J. and Engle, R. W. (2013), ‘No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2): 359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K. and Dieckmann, N. F. (2009), ‘How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making’, Psychological Bulletin, 135(6): 943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyna, V. F., Weldon, R. B. and McCormick, M. (2015), ‘Educating Intuition Reducing Risky Decisions Using Fuzzy-Trace Theory’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5): 392398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahyoun, N. R., Pratt, C. A. and Anderson, A. M. Y. (2004), ‘Evaluation of nutrition education interventions for older adults: a proposed framework’, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104(1): 5869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeichel, B. J. and Vohs, K. D. (2009), ‘Self-Affirmation and Self-Control’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4): 770782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroy, P. C., Emmons, K., Peters, E., Glick, J. T., Robinson, P. A., Lydotes, M. A., Mylvanaman, S., Evans, S., Chaisson, C., Pignone, M., Prout, M., Davidson, P. and Heeren, T. C. (2011), ‘The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision-making for colorectal cancer screening: A randomized trial’, Medical Decision Making, 31(1): 93107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, J. A., Seeff, L. C., Thompson, T. D., Nadel, M. R., Klabunde, C. N. and Vernon, S. W. (2008), ‘Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey’, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 17(7): 16231630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, D. K. and Cohen, G. L. (2006), ‘The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38: 183242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S. and Engle, R. W. (2012), ‘Is working memory training effective?’, Psychological Bulletin, 138(4): 628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinayev, A. and Peters, E. (2015), ‘Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making’, Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P. (2001), Smoking: Risk, Perception, & Policy. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P., Bansal-Travers, M., O'Connor, R., Brown, A., Banthin, C., Guardino-Colket, S. and Cummings, K. M. (2011), ‘Correcting over 50 years of tobacco industry misinformation’, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(6): 690698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strasser, A. A., Tang, K. Z., Romer, D., Jepson, C. and Cappella, J. N. (2012), ‘Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns’, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(1): 4147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Centers for Disease Control (2016), Smoking & Tobacco Use. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/ [29 November 2016]Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services (1994), Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google ScholarPubMed
Viscusi, W. K. (2000), ‘Comment: the perils of qualitative smoking risk measures’, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(2): 267272.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, M. M., Sundaramurthy, S., Lotstein, D., Bush, T. M., Neuwelt, C. M. and Street, R. L. Jr. (2003), ‘Participatory patient–physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus’, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 49(6): 810818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, N. D. (1998), ‘Accuracy of smokers' risk perceptions’, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20(2): 135140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, N. D., Marcus, S. E. and Moser, R. P. (2005), ‘Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk’, Tobacco control, 14(1): 5559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, N. D., Slovic, P., Waters, E. and Gibson, G. (2004), ‘Public understanding of the illnesses caused by cigarette smoking’, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6(2): 349355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilfley, D. and Brownell, K. D. (1994), ‘Physical activity and diet in weight loss’, in Dishman, R. K. (ed.), Advances in exercise adherence, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 361393.Google Scholar
Zullig, L. H., Shaw, R. J. and Bosworth, H. B. (2014), ‘Applying technology to medication management and adherence’, in Marsch, L. A., Lord, S. E. and Dallery, J. (eds), Behavioral health care and technology: using science-based innovations to transform practice, New York: Oxford University Press, 8194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Educating good decisions
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Educating good decisions
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Educating good decisions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *