Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:41:20.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humean replies to Regard for Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Neil Sinhababu Open the ORCID record for Neil Sinhababu [Opens in a new window]
Neil Sinhababu*
Affiliation:
NUS Philosophy, National University of Singapore, Singapore117570. neiladri@gmail.comhttps://www.neilsinhababu.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

First, I argue that the Humean theory is compatible with the commonsense psychological explanations May invokes against it. Second, I explain why desire provides better-integrated explanations than the mental states May describes as sharing its effects. Third, I defend individuating processes by relata, which May rejects in arguing that anti-Humean views are as parsimonious as the Humean theory.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e166
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

May, J. (2018) Regard for reason in the moral mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinhababu, N. (2017) Humean nature: How desire explains action, thought, and feeling. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar