Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:42:27.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lookout for learning: Exploring the links between drama and environmental education pedagogies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Susan J. Wake  and
Sally Birdsall
Susan J. Wake
Affiliation:
School of Architecture, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
Sally Birdsall*
Affiliation:
School of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, University of Auckland, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author: Email: s.birdsall@auckland.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Environmental educators remain challenged by how to encourage people to make connections between environmental quality and human development in a way that is socially just and equitable for all living things. This article explores links between performance-based learning and environmental education pedagogy as one way to address this challenge. Sixteen children (8–10 years) from an Auckland primary school worked with a performance artist to present Lookout, an intimate performance by a child for an adult. Its intent was to juxtapose people’s different backgrounds, experiences and ages in a two-way communication of their view of Auckland City through an environmental lens encompassing past, present and future, while surveying the city from a vantage point. Analysis of data from focus groups with the children and interviews with their parents (also participants) showed that the Lookout process led to children developing a deeper understanding of Auckland City’s issues, a stronger sense of connection to their city, an understanding of the future, and feelings of empowerment. However, their parents’ learning was more tenuous. Three key elements to the success of Lookout for learning are identified, and it is proposed that these could be used when developing performance-based environmental education programs.

Keywords

Environmental educationchildrenplacearts-based
Type
Research/Practice Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 36 , Special Issue 3: Making connections: Creating relationships with nonhuman nature, place and community , November 2020 , pp. 234 - 245
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock, L., & Ballantyne, R. (2007). Drama as a tool in interpretation: Practitioner preceptions of its strengths and limitations. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 23, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, S. (2010). Empowering students to act: Learning about, through and from the nature of action. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, K. (2011). Drama as a teaching tool. Retrieved from http://teachingthroughthearts.blogspot.co.nz/2011/07/drama-as-teaching-tool.html Google Scholar
Chawla, L. (2008). Participation and the ecology of environmental awareness and action. In Reid, A., Jensen, B.B., Nikel, J. & Simovska, V. (Eds.), Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability. pp. 98–110. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, D.J., Howden, M., Curtis, F., McColm, I., Scrine, J., Blomfield, T., … Ryan, T. (2014). Drama and environment: Joining forces to engage children and young people in environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2018). Lookout. Performance Research, 23, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenewald, D. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, P. (2010). No longer a ‘little added frill’: The transformative potential of environmental education for educational change. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 155–178.Google Scholar
Jickling, B., & Wals, A. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, G. (2006). Curriculum spaces: Situating educational research, theory and practice. The Journal of Educational Thought, 40, 229–245.Google Scholar
Lee, B., Patall, E., Cawthon, S., & Steingut, R. (2015). The effect of drama-based pedagogy on preK-16 Outcomes: A meta-analysis of research from 1985–2012. Review of Educational Research, 85, 3–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, S. (2005). Drama in environmental education. Green Teacher, 77(Fall), 15–19.Google Scholar
Malone, K., & Hartung, C. (2010). Playing with power: Children’s participation in theory. In Percy-Smith, B. & Thomas, N. (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation (pp. 24–38). Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNaughton, M.J. (2004). Educational drama in the teaching of education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 10, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, M.J. (2010). Educational drama in education for sustainable development: Ecopedagogy in action Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C., & Saxton, J. (2011). ‘To see the world as if it were otherwise’: Brain research challenges the curriculum of ‘organised chunks’. NJ, 35, 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNHCHR). http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009). Green at fifteen? How 15-year-olds perform in environmental science in PISA 2006. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
Stake, R.E. (1994). Case studies. In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sterling, S. (2010). Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in the paradigm of sustainable education. Environmental Education Research, 16, 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (2007a). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. (2007b). Schooling and environmental /sustainability education: From discourses in policy and practice to discourses of professional learning. Environmental Education Research, 13, 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability (Technical Paper No. 2). Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
van Eijck, M. (2010). Place-based education as a call from/for action. In Tippins, D.J., Mueller, M.P., van Eijck, M., & Adams, J.D. (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (pp. 323–330). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wals, A.E.J., & Benavot, A. (2017). Can we meet the sustainability challenges? The role of education and lifelong learning. European Journal of Education Research, Development and Policy, 52, 404–413.Google Scholar