Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T06:09:44.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of working memory on L2 linguistic knowledge and L2 listening comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2021

Miki Satori Open the ORCID record for Miki Satori [Opens in a new window]
Miki Satori*
Affiliation:
Department of World Liberal Arts, Nagoya University of Foreign Studies, Nisshin, Aichi Prefecture, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: msatori@nufs.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examined the relationship between working memory (WM) and L2 linguistic knowledge as well as L2 listening comprehension with 150 Japanese EFL learners. The study also investigated the extent to which these relationships vary across L2 proficiency levels. The results in the study were as follows: (a) WM capacity was more strongly associated with L2 listening comprehension, L2 perceptual processing, and L2 syntactic parsing processing in the lower-proficiency group than in the higher-proficiency group; (b) L1 WM capacity still accounted for the unique variance in L2 listening comprehension after adjusting for the L2 language-related variables in the lower-proficiency group. The results suggest that the relationship between WM capacity and L2 listening comprehension may be mediated by L2 proficiency and depend on the domain-general processing efficiency reflecting central executive attention when the listening comprehension task requires conscious attention for less proficient listeners. The findings provide suggestive evidence for variation in the role of WM in L2 listening comprehension across proficiency levels and the significant role of L1 WM capacity in L2 listening comprehension as the general cognitive factor independent of L2 linguistic knowledge for L2 learners with limited linguistic knowledge.

Keywords

second-language acquisitionlisteningworking memoryexecutive attention
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , September 2021 , pp. 1313 - 1340
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., & Shahnazari-Dorcheh, M. (2014). The relationship between working memory and L2 reading comprehension. Applied Research on English Language, 3(2), 19–32.Google Scholar
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., & Özemir, O. (2014). Effects of variations in reading span task design on the relationship between working memory capacity and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Shoonen, R., & Hulstin, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62(S2), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp.28–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.D. (2007). Working memory, thought and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (1990). Listening to spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brunfaut, T., & Revesz, A. (2015). The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çeçen, S., & Erçetin, G. (2016). Interrelationships among L2 linguistic knowledge, working memory functions, and L2 reading. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (Eds.), Bilingual processing and acquisition: Vol.3. Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 223–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bpa.3.11cec CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, D. C., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colflesh, G. J. H., & Conway, A. R. A. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 699–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in Favor of a Broad Framework for Pronunciation Instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, K., &Osaka, M. (2011). Individual differences of the strategy use in the Japanese listening span test. Paper presented at the 8th conference on working memory, Kyoto, JAPAN.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fujita, E. (2003). Sitteru eigonanoni nazekikitorenai (Why can’t we recognize spoken English that we already know)? Tokyo: Natsumesha.Google Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and the L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: Theory and research. New York, NY: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2019). An individual-differences framework for comparing nonnative with native speakers: Perspectives from BLC theory. Language Learning, 69, 157–183. doi: 10.1111/lang.12317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeno, O. (2006). L1 and L2 working memory: An investigation into the domain specificity and processing efficiency issues. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Ehime University, 53, 113–121.Google Scholar
Jincho, N., Namiki, H., & Mazuka, R. (2008). Effects of verbal working memory and cumulative linguistic knowledge. Japanese Psychology Research, 50, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, P. (2008). Linguistic knowledge and psycholinguistic skills as components of L2 listening comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Roehampton University, London.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 1371–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. (2014). Prosody and comprehension of ambiguous dative NPs in Korean. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 6(2), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J. H. (2007). The role of prosody in English sentence processing: Evidence from L1-Korean EFL learners. Language Research, 43(1), 175–201.Google Scholar
Masrai, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(3), 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323–348.Google Scholar
Milton, J., Wade, J., & Hopkins, N. (2010). Aural word recognition and oral competence in English as a foreign language. In Chacón-Beltrán, R., Abello-Contesse, C., & Torreblanca-López, M. (eds), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 83–98). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (Eds.). (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. & Osaka, M. (1998). Cue acquisition and syntactic comprehension in second language learning. Finding reported in Miyake, A., Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1994). Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Noreillie, A. S., Kestemont, B., Heylen, K., Desmet, P., & Peters, E. (2018). Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169, 212–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. W. (1993). Teaching reduced forms: An aid for improving lower-level students’ listening skills. Fukuoka Women’s Junior College studies, 46, 49–56.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading spans. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 30, 287–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osaka, M., Osaka, N., & Groner, R. (1993). Language-independent working memory: Evidence from German and French reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osaka, N. (Ed.). (2000). Brain and working memory. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal, 78, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N. (2008). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Han, Z. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp.133–147). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Satori, M. (2010). The effect of teaching phonetic information through repeated practice of dictation and reading aloud in L2 listening class. The Language Education & Technology, 47, 159–180.Google Scholar
Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 18, 617–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M. F., Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N.M. (2000). Working memory resources and children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 13, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipstead, Z., & Yonehiro, J. (2016). The domain-specific and domain-general relationships of visuospatial working memory to reasoning ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1504–1512. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1021-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Stӕhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanston, H. L., Howard, C. B., & Sáez, L. (2011). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushiro, Y. & Sakuma, Y. (2000). Modifying reading and listening span tests for group testing. JLTAT Journal, 3, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vafaee, P. & Suzuki, Y. (2020). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent development in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. C. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65, 390–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. C. (2018). Learner variables important for success in L2 listening comprehension in French immersion classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, M. P. (2020). Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Language Learning, 1(40), 1–40. doi: 10.1111/lang.12424 Google Scholar
Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representation of text to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistic, 25(3), 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, C. (2007). First- to second-language reading comprehension: not transfer, but access. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R., & Brown, C. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation-model construction. Discourse Processing, 21, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar