No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Communicative Language Teaching in ESP Contexts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2008
Extract
Five years ago book-length studies of the craft of English for Specific Purposes comprsied Munby's Communicative Syllabus Design (1978) and Robinson's ESP (English for Specific Purposes) (1980), substantive additions to this very short list had been made by widdowson (1984), Kennedy and Bolitho (1984), McDonough (1984), Trimble (1985), and Hutchinson and task-orinented collections of papers (Swales 1985b, Peterson 1986), several conference proceedings (e.g., Tickoo 1986) and comprehensive survey articles such as that by Maher (1986) on English for Medical Purposes. Nor has there been any abatement in the steady stream of ESP-related articles, papers, theses, and monographs.
- Type
- Communicative Language Teaching
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987
References
UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bridgeman, B. and Carlson, S.. 1983. A survey of academic writing tasks required of graduate and undergraduate foreign students. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. [TOEFL Research Report, No. 15.]Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. 1984. Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 1984. Case studies in business English. In James, G. (ed.) The ESP classroom. Exeter, (U.K.): Exeter Linguistic Studies. 7. 24–33.Google Scholar
Dhaif, H. 1983. Learning English for science and technology…an alternative approach. London: University of London. Ph. D. diss.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L.Poster sessions at biomedical meetings: Design and presentation. English for specific purposes. 4.1.37–48.Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T. 1984. The team-teaching of writing skills. In Williams, R., Swales, J., and Kirkman, J. (eds.) Common ground: Shared interests in ESP and communication studies. Oxford: Pergamon. 127–133.Google Scholar
Edge, J. 1984. Structuring the information gap. English language teaching journal. 38. 4. 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edge, J. and Samuda, V.. 1981. “Methodials”: The role and design of materials and method. In Richards, D. (ed.) Communicative course design. Singapore: Regional English Language Centre [RELC]. 50–67.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J. 1986. Cognitive style and specific-purpose course design. English for specific purposes. 5. 2. 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. et al. 1986. Patterns of thought in scientific writing: A course in information structuring for engineering students. English for specific purposes. 5. 2. 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, E. 1986. No new lamps for old yet, please. English for specific purposes. 5. 2. 147–160.Google Scholar
Hartnett, D. D. 1985. Cognitive style and second language learning. In Celce-Murcia, M. (ed.) Beyond basics: Issues and research in TESOL. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 16–33.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. 1984. Research into classroom culture as necessary input into syllabus design. In Swales, J. and Mustafa, H. (eds.) English for specific purposes in the Arab world. Birmingham, (U.K.): Language Studies Unit, Aston University, 29–51.Google Scholar
Johns, A. n.d. Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: Ethnography in the academic milieu. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Johns, A. 1987. The language of business. In Kaplan, R. B. et al. , (eds.) Annual review of applied liguistics, VII. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. 1985. Formative evaluation as an indicator of student wants and attitudes. English for specific purposes. 4. 2. 93–100.Google Scholar
Madden, C. and Reinhart, S.. 1987. Pyramids. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Maher, J. 1986. English for medical purposed. Language teaching. 19. 2. 112–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markee, N. 1985. The relevance of sociopolitical factors to communicative course design. English for specific purposes. 5. 1. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, P. W. (ed.) 1986. ESP in practice. Washington, DC: United Stats Information Agency.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. K. and Shettlesworth, C. C.. 1978. How to arm your students: A considerations of two approaches to providing materials for ESP. ELT document--ESP. London: The British Council. 23–35.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. 1986. English for communication engineers--A case study in two-way curricular development. In Tickoo, M. L. (ed.) Language across the curriculum. Singapore: Regional English Language Centre [RELC]. 76–92.Google Scholar
Scott, H. and Scott, J.. 1984. ESP and Rubic's Cube: Three dimensions in course design and materials writing. In Swales, J. and Mustafa, H. (eds.) English for specific purposes in the Arab world. Birmingham, (U.K.): Language Studies Unit, Aston University, 211–227.Google Scholar
Swales, J. 1985b. ESP--The heart of the matter or the end of the affair? In Quirk, R. and Widdowson, H. G. (eds.) English in the world. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press. 212–223.Google Scholar
Swales, J. 1987. Utilizing the literature in teaching the research paper. TESOL quarterly. 21. 1. 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, L. 1985. English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.Google Scholar
Waters, A. 1987. Participatory course evaluation in ESP. English for specific purposes. 6. 1. 3–12.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1981. English for specific purposes: Criteria for course desogn. In Selinker, L.. Tarone, E.. and Hanzeli, V. (eds.) English for academic and teachnical purposes. Rowkey, MA: Newbury House. 1–11.Google Scholar
Zak, H. and Dudley-Evans, T.. 1986. Features of word omission and abbreviation in telexes. English for specific purposes. 5. 1. 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar