Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:22:50.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applied Linguistics and Communicative Language Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Christopher Brumfit
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some linguists may well feel that it is inappropriate to devote an entire issue of the Annual Review of Applied Linguistics to a movement exclusively within language teaching. It would certainly be inaccurate to see language teaching as simply an application of linguistics, and some parts of this issue of ARAL will necessarily survey material that is not exclusively applied linguistics. Nonetheless, one particular tradition of applied linguistics has been heavily committed to the development of effective second language teaching strategies, and communicative language teaching has been responsive to changes in our approach to language study in its most central tenets and beliefs.

Type
Communicative Language Teaching
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 8 , March 1987 , pp. 3 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alatis, J. E., Stern, H. H., and Strevens, P. (eds.) 1983. Applied linguistics and the preparation of second language teachers: Towards a rationale. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. [Georgetown University Round Table.]Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. B. and Widdowson, H. G.. 1974. Teaching the communicative use of English. International review of applied linguistics. 12. 1.1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwright, R. L. 1977. Language learning through communication practice. ELT documents. 76. 3. 2–14.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, M. and Candlin, C. N.. 1980. The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied linguistics. 1. 2. 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. 1980. From defining to designing: Communicative specifications versus communicative methodology in foreign language teaching. Studies in second language acquisition. 3. 1. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. 1984a. Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of accuracy and fluency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. 1984b. Theoretical implications of interlanguage studies for language teaching. In Davies, A., Criper, C., and Howatt, A. P. R. (eds.) Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. 1985. Language and literature teaching: From practice to principle. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. and Johnson, K. (eds.) 1979. The Communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canale, M. and Swain, M.. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics. 1. 1. 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C. N. 1971. Sociolinguistics and communicative language teaching. Paper delivered to IATEFL Conference, London. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Clark, J. L. 1987. Curriculum renewal in school foreign language learning. Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1981. Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coste, D. et al. ., 1976. Un niveau seuil. [A threshold level.] Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. 1986. An introduction to discourse analysis. Harlow: Longman. [New edition; 1st ed. 1977.]Google Scholar
Davies, A., Criper, C., and Howatt, A. P. R. (eds.) 1984. Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Day, R. R. 1982. Children's attitudes towards language. In Ryan, E. B. and Giles, H. (eds.) Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.. 1986. Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ELT Documents. 1982. Humanistic approaches: An empirical view. ELT documents. 113.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M. and Brumfit, C. J.. 1983. The functional-notional approach: From theory to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, M., Spada, N., and Allen, J. P. B.. 1985. Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms. TESOL quarterly. 19. 1. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. (ed.) 1977. Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and semantics: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. [Vol. 3.]Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harding, A., Page, B., and Rowell, S. (eds.) 1980. Graded objectives in modern languages. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R. 1984. A History of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1967. Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of social issues. 23. 2. 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 1982. Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. and Morrow, K. (eds.) 1981 Communication in the classroom. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. and Porter, D. (eds.) 1983. Perspectives in communicative language teaching. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. (ed.) 1980. On the scope of applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. 1981. Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. 1983. Does second language instruction make a difference? TESOL quarterly. 17. 3. 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. 1985. Communicative interaction research project, final report. Department of Education: University of Stirling, Scotland.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. In press. Communicative interaction: A research report. London: Center for Information on language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Munby, J. L. 1978. Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newmark, L. 1966. How not to interfere with language learning. International journal of American linguistics. 32. 1. 77–83.Google Scholar
Oller, J. 1971. Language communication and second language learning. In Pimsleur, P. and Quinn, T. (eds.) The psychology of second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. 1987. Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. 1985. The secret life of methods. In Richards, J. C.The context of language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S.. 1986. Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. 1981. Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [2nd ed.; 1st ed. 1968]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1967. A short history of linguistics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Savignon, S. J. 1983. Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. and Richards, J. C.. 1980. Speech acts ans second language learning. Applied linguistics. 1. 2. 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, H. H. 1983. Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevick, E. W. 1976. Memory, meaning and method. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Stevick, E. W. 1980. Teaching languages: A way and ways. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swan, M. 1985. A critical look at the communicative approach. English language teaching journal. 39. 1. 2–12 and 39. 2. 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triangle 2. 1982. Approaches, methodik, enseignement, [Approaches, method, instruction.] Paris, Goethe-Institut, British Council, AUPELF.Google Scholar
Trim, J. L. M. 1973. Draft outline of a European unit/credit system for modern languages. In Trim, J. L. M. et al. , Systems development in adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
van, Ek J. 1975. The threshold level. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1972. The teachings of English as communication. English language teaching journal. 27. 1. 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1978. Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1979. Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1980. Models and fictions. Applied linguistics. 1. 2. 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1983. Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1985. Against dogma: A reply to Michael Swan. English language teaching journal. 39. 3. 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. 1972a. An investigation into the linguistic and situational common core in a unit/credit system. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. 1972b. Grammatical, situational and notional syllabuses. In Proceedings of the third international congress of applied linguistics, copenhagen 1972. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. 1976. Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yalden, J. 1983. The communicative syllabus: Evoluion, design and implementation. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar