Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:43:23.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquisition of Morphology and Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Bogdan Krakowian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The early development of second language acquisition [SLA] research in the area of morphology and syntax can be traced in some excellent publications both exemplifying and evaluating the state of the art in this area (e.g., Anderson 1981, Davies, Criper, and Howatt 1984, Hatch 1983, Wode 1981b). The research questions identified and pursued at that time have continued to occupy researchers. (The ones which are the most important and relevant for the discussion here are as follows: 1 the problem of regularity in interlanguage [IL] morphology and syntax; 2) the contribution of Universal Grammar to SLA, and 3) variability in IL performance. The problems enumerated above will provide a framework for the discussion of the acquisition of morphology and syntax. Some additional comments on other, related issues will be included.

Type
Process and product in sla
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 9 , March 1988 , pp. 42 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Unannotated Bibliography

Andersen, R. (ed.) 1981. New dimensions in second language acquisition research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1987. Markedness and salience in second language acquisition. Language learning. 37. 3. 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, P. 1981. Formal simplicity and functional simplification in second language acquisition. In Anderson, R. W.New dimensions in second language acquisition research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 146–152.Google Scholar
Davies, A.Criper, C., and Howatt, A. P. R. (eds.) 1984. Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M., and Krashen, S.. 1982. Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., and Nelson, D. (eds.) 1984. Universal of second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (ed.) 1987b. Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. and Madden, C. G. (eds.) 1985. Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. 1984. Krashen's Monitor and Occam's razor. Applied linguistics. 5. 2. 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. M. 1983. Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. and M., Pienemann (eds.) 1985. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. 1984. The empirical evidence for the influence of the L1 in interlanguage. In Davies, A., Criper, C., and Howatt, A. P. R. (eds.) Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 98–122.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. and M., Sharwood Smith (eds.) 1986. Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. 1985. Foreign and second language learning: Language acquisition research and its implications for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazurkevich, I. 1984. Dative questions and markedness. In Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., and Nelson, D. (eds.) Universals of second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 119–131.Google Scholar
Noyau, C. and Véronique, D.. 1986. Survey article. Studies in second language acquistion 8. 3. 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, B. 1987. A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language learning. 37. 3. 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1985. Learnability and syllabus construction. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M. (eds.) Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters. 23–75.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. 1987. The expression of temporality in basilang speech. Studies in second language acquisition. 9. 1. 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L. 1984. The current state of interlanguage studies: An attempted critical summary. In Davies, A., Criper, C., and Howatt, A. P. R. (eds.) Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 332–343.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. A. 1982. Language transfer: The state of the art. Finlance. 2.27.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. A. 1986. The competence/control model, crosslinguistic influence and the creation of new grammars. In Kellerman, K. and Smith, M. Sharwood (eds.) Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. 10–20.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. 1984. On the variability of interlanguage systems. In Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., and Nelson, D. (eds.) Universals of second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 3–23.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. 1987. Methodologies for studying variability in second language acquisition. In Ellis, R. (ed.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 35–46.Google Scholar
Van Patten, B. 1984. Processing strategies and morpheme acquisition. In Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., and Nelson, D. (eds.) Universals of second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 88–98.Google Scholar
Weinert, R. 1987. Processes in classroom second language development: The acquisition of negation in German. In Ellis, R. (ed.) Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 83–99.Google Scholar
White, L. 1987. Markedness and second language acquisition: The question of transfer. Studies in second language acquisition. 9.3.261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. 1981a. Language acquisitional universals: A unified view of language acquisition. Paper delivered at the Conference on Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition. New York. January. [Subsequuently published in Englisches Seminar der Universität Kiet. Arbeitspapiere zum Spracherwerb. Nr. 26.] Kiel: University of Kiel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. 1981b. Learning a second language: An integrated view of second language acquisition. Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wode, H. 1984. Some theoretical implications of L2 acquisition research and the grammer of interlanguage. In Davies, A., Criper, C., and Howatt, A. P. R. (eds.) Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 162–184.Google Scholar
Wode, H., et al. 1978. Development sequences: An alternative approach to morpheme order. Language learning. 28. 1. 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar