Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T20:07:52.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discourse analysis and social construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Extract

Complex social activities—such as maintaining a legal system, fostering a literary system, or developing communally validated knowledge—rely on language as the medium through which these activities are accomplished. Law, literature, science, religion, politics, and even economics are socially constructed through discourse. Special language tools and uses have developed in conjuction with the rise of these activities. Thus, we may well say that the construction of legal language is part and parcel of the construction of the legal instructions that order social lives, and that the language acts using legal language were developed in coordination with the elaboration of roles, responsibilities, and relationships of legal actors.

Type
Foundations of Discourse
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, W. 1984. Between the library and the laboratory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bames, B. 1974. Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bames, B. and Shapin, S. (eds.) 1979. Natural order: Historical studies of scientific culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental articles in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. 1989. Forms and forums of validation: The magical rhetoric of von Guericke's sulfur globe. Paper delivered at the Convention of the Society for the Social Studies of Science. Irvine, CA, 11, 1989.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. 1990 a. How natural philosophers can cooperate. In Bazerman, C. and Paradis, J. (eds.). Textual dynamic of the professions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 1144.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. 1990b. Electrifying words. paper delivered at the Convention of the Society for the Social of Science. Minneapolis, MN, 10, 1990.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T.. 1966. The Social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bijker, W., Hughes, T. and Pinch, T. (eds.) 1987. The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1977. A poetic for sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, J., Law, J. and Rip, A. (eds.) 1986. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G.. 1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. 1983. The sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual review of sociology. 9.265285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. and Pinch, T.. 1982. Frames of meaning: The social construction of extraordinary science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cozzens, S. 1985. Comparing the sciences: Citation contex analysis of papers from neuropharmocology and the sociology of science. Social studies of science. 15. 127153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, P. 1985. Totius in verba: Rhetoric and authority in the early Royal Society. Isis. 76.145161.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. N. 1977. Referencing as persuasion. Social studies of science. 7.113122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, D. 1990. Mapping experiment as a learning process: How the first electromagnetic motor was invented. Science, technology, & human values. 15.2.165201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, B. and Mullins, N.. 1972. Coherent social groups in scientific change. Science. 177.959964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutaions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1988. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. 1986. The rhetoric of economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Mulkay, M. 1985. The word and the world. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mullins, N., Hargens, L., Hecht, P. and Kick, E.. 1977. The group structure of cocitation clusters. American sociological review. 42.552562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, G. 1990a. Writing biology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Myers, G. 1990b. Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In Bazeman, C. and Paradis, J. (eds.) Textual dynamics of the professions. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 4575.Google Scholar
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M.. 1987. Discourse and social psychology. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Price, D. J. 1965. Networks of scientific papers. Science. 149. 510515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T.. 1973. The sturctures of the life world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. 1982. History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of science 20.157211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S.. 1985. Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
shotter, J. and Gergen, K. (eds.) 1989. Texts of identity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Small, H. 1978. Cited documents as concept symbols. Social studies of science. 8.327340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, R. (ed.) 1979. On the margins of science. Keele: Sociological Review Monographs.Google Scholar