^{page 197 note 1} All, that is, of whose provenance we have information: i.e., Nos. III. (IV.) and VI. in the present series, and all in the C.I.A. exe. Nos. 774–776, whose locality is unknown, and No. 771b, described as‘Athenis repertum.’

^{page 197 note 2} Buck, C. D., ‘Inscriptions found upon the Akropolis’ in the American Journal of Archaeology, iv. 1888 p. 149 foil.Google Scholar

^{page 197 note 3} See Clerc, M., Les Métèques Athéniens, Paris, 1893 p. 288 foil.Google Scholar; Foucart, G., De libertorum conditione apud Athenienses, Paris, 1896, p. 61 foll.Google Scholar; Thumser, V., ‘Lehrbuch der griechischen Staatsaltertümer’ in Hermann's, K. F.Lehrbuch der griechischen Antiquitäten, Vol. 1 part 2, (sixth edition, Freiburg i. B. 1892), p. 418 foll.Google Scholar

^{page 198 note 1} Pollux I. 28 τὰ δ᾿ ἀναθήματα ὡς ἐπὶ τὸ πολὺ στεφανοι, φιάλαι, ἐκπώματα, κτλ Cf. Wallon, , Mém. de l'acad. des inscr. xix. 2 p. 274 foll.Google ScholarΦιάλαι are shallow circular vessels, without handles and usually without bases, used chiefly for drinking and libations.

^{page 198 note 2} In a few inscriptions of this class ἀπέφυγε takes the place of ἀποφυγών and the words φιἀλη H are wanting; we must suppose that in these the reference to the ᾿Εφ.᾿Αρχ was included in the heading.

^{page 199 note 1} See note on Insc. III. col. iii. 1. 2.

^{page 199 note 2} Lüders, Die dionys. Künstler, p. 47; Ziebarth, Das griechische Vereinswesen, pp. 35 f., 135f.

^{page 199 note 3} Λθηναῖον 124(1839).

^{page 199 note 4} Antiq. Hell. 234, 881, 882.

^{page 199 note 5} Inscr. All. nuper repertae duodecim, p. 19 (1843).

^{page 199 note 6} Mémoires de l'acad. des inscr. et belles-lettres xix. 2 p. 266 foll. (1853). This article appears to have escaped the notice of M. Clerc and M. Foucart.

^{page 199 note 7} Mittheilungen aus Athen, III. (1878), p. 172 foil.

^{page 200 note 1} Wiener Studien, 1880, p. 213–218.

^{page 200 note 2} Zeiischr. f. oeterr. Gymn. 1881, p. 167 foll.

^{page 200 note 3} δίκη ἀποστασίου VIII. 528( =C.I.A. ii. 2. 776).

^{page 200 note 4} Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, in Hermes xxii. (1887), p. 110.Google Scholar

^{page 200 note 5} Köhler indeed in editing the Corpus insc. Attic, still hesitated: but the difficulty he felt about accepting Schenkl's explanation (cf. Lipsius in Meier-Schömann-Lipsius 621, note 373) rests upon the assumption that the προστάτης can only be brought if a freedman enrols himself under a patron ἀποστασίου δίκη τίς ἐστι κατὰ τῶν ἀπελευθερωθέντων δεδομένη τοῖς ἀπελευ other than his former master. In reality it covers a much wider field. Cf. also Clerc, op. cit. 292.

^{page 200 note 6} Harpocr. θερώσασιν ἐὰν ἀφιστῶνταί τι ἀπ᾿ αὐτῶν ἤ ἕτερον ἐπιγράφωνται προστάτην καὶ ἄ κελεύουσιν οἱ νόμοι μὴ ποιῶσιν καὶ τοὺς μὲν ἁλόντας δεῖ δούλους εἶναι, τοὺς δὲ νικήσαντας τελέως ἤδη ἐλευ θέρους δίκη ἀποστασίου Cf. Thumser, loc. cit. p. 418, n. 6.

^{page 200 note 7} Such appears to me one of the natural results of an acquittal in a δίκη ἀποστασίου I do not quite understand M. Th. Reinach's difficulty in accepting the. statement that ‘l'affranchi vainqueur dans la ᾿Εξελόμενος εἰς ἐλευθερίαν choisissait désormais librement son patron’ (Rev. Et. Gr. x. III).

^{page 201 note 1} Hermes xxii. p. 110, n. I.

^{page 201 note 2} δίκη ἀποστασίου See Thumser, l.c.; Wachsmuth, , Stadt Athen, ii. I. 151Google Scholar, n. 2.

^{page 201 note 3} Thumser, l.c., 418 n. 7.

^{page 201 note 4} G. Foucart, op. cit. 64 foll. M. Foiicart appears to have arrived at this result independently of Wilamowitz-Moellendorff and Thumser, since he does not refer to their works.

^{page 201 note 5} G. Foucart, p. 76, and others.

^{page 201 note 6} Bull. de Corr. Hell. 1887, p. 364, foll.

^{page 202 note 1} Like Clerc (op. cit. p. 290) I am unable to understand Wachsmuth's note (Stadt Athen, ii. 151 n. 2): since, however, he speaks of a ‘Freilassung durch Loskauf, die vor Gericht in Form einer χαλκέας (φάσιν εἶναι) τοὺς τὸν σίδηρον ἐργαζομένους erfolgte’ there may be some reference to a theory such as I have above stated.

^{page 203 note 1} Besides the well-known works of Büchsenschütz, , Besitz und Erwerb im Griechischen Alterthume Halle, 1869Google Scholar; and Blümner, , Technologie und Terminologie der Gewerbe und Künste bei Griechen tind Römern, 4 vols. Leipzig, 1875–1887Google Scholar, I may specially mention Scherling, G., Quibus rebus singulorum Atticae pagorum incolae operam dederint in Vol. xviii, of Leipziger Studien für Classisschen Philologie, Leipzig, 1897Google Scholar, and the Appendix to Clerc, op. cit. p. 450. Clerc, Book III. sect. ii. pp. 387 foll, should also be consulted.

^{page 203 note 2} Aristoph. Lys. 408; Demosth. in Meid. 23 foll.

^{page 203 note 3} Arist. Poet. 26. 21 χαλκεύς Hesych. πᾶς τεχνίτης, καὶ ὁ ἀργυροκόπος, καὶ ὁ χρυσοχόος χαλκεύς =χρυσοχόος In Od. 3. 432 ἐπρίατο δοῦλον, βυρσοδέψην Παφλαγόνα (cf. 1. 425); and in Od. 9. 391 it = ‘worker in iron’ (cf. 1. 393).

^{page 203 note 4} See note on the inscription published below, No. III. col. ii. 1. 14.

^{page 203 note 5} Aristoph. Eq. 44 Σκυλόδεψος Nub. 581 (the reference in the Thesaurus to Eq. 447 is an error); cf. Plut. 167, Pax 753. These passages, amongst many, show in what repute tanners were held by the Athenians.

^{page 203 note 6} σκυλοδέψιος occurs in [Dem.] xxv. 781. 18; the edd. restore it in Hesych. (s.v.) for the MS. σκυλοδέψης More common is χαλκῆς, κεραμῆς, σκυλοδέψαι e.g. Aristoph. Av. 490 σκυτῆς, βαλανῆς, κ.τ.λ. σκυλάδεψος, σκυλαδέψης Eccl. 420. Eustath. quotes by-forms γποδηματάριος

^{page 204 note 1} Il. 7. 221; Plato, Resp. x. 60Ic; Xen. Hell. iii. 4. 17; Cyrop. vi. 2. 37; and cf. below, note 6.

^{page 204 note 2} See note on inscription III. iii. 4. ὑποδηματορράφος occurs in Curtius Inscrr. Ait. p. 32, n. 192. 8, νευρορράφοις καὶ σκυτοτόμοις καὶ βυρσοπώλαισιν in Arcadius, p. 84. 26; Synes. p. 117.

^{page 204 note 3} Arist. Eq. 739, Νευρορράφους εἶπε Λυκοῦργος τοὺς τὰ νεῦρα ῥάπτοντας ταῖς λύραις Plato Resp. iv. 421A speaks of them with contempt; cf. Themist. in Sophista, p. 263B. Another sense of the word is given by Schol. Plat, ad l.c. p. 402 ταλασιουργοί οἱ ἱστουργοἱ. The word has not hitherto been known in the feminine.

^{page 204 note 4} Kirchner, , Hermes xxxi. p. 254.Google Scholar

^{page 204 note 5} Scherling, op. cit, p. 39.

^{page 204 note 6} Aristoph. Lys. 414, 416: Eccl. 385; Plato, Gorg. 447D, 490E, etc.; Aristot. Eth. Nic. I. 1101A4; Pollux vii. 80.

^{page 204 note 7} See note on inscription III. ii. 21, and add Pollux vii. III. Kollytos seems to have been the centre of the wood-working industry; see Scherling op. cit, p. 48.

^{page 204 note 8} There does not seem to be any warrant for confining the word (as L. and S. ) to spinning: it probably includes carding, spinning, and weaving (cf. Bek ker, Anecd. Gr. ταλασιουργία). The woollen manufacture was considered as belonging naturally, we might almost say essentially, to the women; see Plato, Ion 540c; but especially Suid. s.v. κάπηλος πονη

^{page 205 note 1} Aristoph. Pax, 190.

^{page 205 note 2} G. Foucart, op. cit. p. 52.

^{page 205 note 3} Diog. Laert. iii. 41.

^{page 205 note 4} Loewy, Insch. griech. Bildhauer, note to No. 537.

^{page 205 note 5} Scherling, op. cit. p. 41, foll.

^{page 205 note 6} Oed. Col. 16 foll., 58 foll., 668 foll.

^{page 205 note 7} Plato, , Resp. ii. 371DGoogle Scholar; cf. Schol. Aristoph. Pl. 521, and the following note.

^{page 206 note 1} Plato, Polit. 290A, Protag. 313c. Metaphorically in [Dem.] xxv. 57, p. 784 ρίας καὶ παλιγκάπηλος καὶ μεταβολεύς κάπηλοι. The contrast between ἔμποροι and καπήλους καλοῦμεν τοὺς πρὸς ὠνήν τε καὶ πρᾶσιν διακονοῦντας ἱδρυμένους ἐν is emphasised in Plato, , Resp. ii. 371DGoogle Scholarἀγορᾷ, τοὺς δὲ πλανήτας ἐπὶ τὰς πόλεις ἐμπόρους κάπηλοι. The σχεδόν τι οἱ ἀσθενέστατοι τὰ σώματα καὶ ἀχρεῖοί τι ἄλλο ἔργον πράττειν are spoken of in the preceding paragraph as Πάσανος

^{page 206 note 2} Aristoph. Thesm. 347; Plut. 435, 1120.

^{page 206 note 3} Pollux vii. 196.

^{page 206 note 4} Pollux vii. 21; Hesych. s.v. ᾿Αγοραστής. The bread seems usually to have been sold by women; see, e.g. Aristoph. Vesp. 238; Ran. 858.

^{page 206 note 5} Plut. Mor. 631D; Lucian, Vilt. aucl. c. II; Pollux vii. 27. Blümner, Griech. Privatalterth. p. 227, note 1, in K. F. Hermann's Lehtbuch.

^{page 206 note 6} C. Scherimg, op. cit. p. 30; neither the mase. nor the fern, form occurs in the Thesaurus.

^{page 206 note 7} Cratin. ap. Athen, xiv. 661E; Pollux vii. 196.

^{page 206 note 8} Aristoph. Eg. 129 and Schol. Pollux vii. 72.

^{page 206 note 9} ὀψώνης (Pollux iii. 126; Athen, iv. 171A), or ὀψώνης. For this account of the Athenian Agora, I am indebted chiefly to the excellent chapter in Wachsmuth, , Die Stadt Athen im Alterthum, Leipzig, 1890, Vol. II.Google Scholar part I, pages 443 foll.

^{page 206 note 10} Theophr. Charact. 22.

^{page 207 note 1} Hesych. s.v. ὀψώνης Pollux vii. 132, from which passages we learn that they were also called by ὀψώνης and προυνικοί Wachsmuth l.c. 456, n. I.

^{page 207 note 2} Wachsmuth, l.c. 451, n. 5.

^{page 207 note 3} Demosth. liv. 10, p. 1258. 21 (Ariston speaks) Βυζάντιοι[plut]Vit. X orat.9, p. 849E (Hypereides)ἐποιεῖτο τὸν περίπατον ἐν τῇ ἰχθυοπώλιδι ὁσημέραι ἐωθινός[cod.εἰκός]Athen. viii. 342c ῾´ Ερμιππος δὲ φησιν . . . ἐωθινὸν τὸν ῾Γπερείδην ποισῖσθαι νῦν τοὺς περιπάτους ἐν τοῖς ἰχθύσι.

^{page 207 note 4} It is mentioned in Aristoph. Eccl. 686.

^{page 207 note 5} Athen, xiii. 612A.

^{page 207 note 6} Pollux x. 18 ϊνα δ᾿ ἐπιπρἁσκετο τὰ σκεύη, τῆς ἀγορᾶς τὸ μέρος τοῦτο κύκλοι ὀνομάζοντο, κ.τ.λ. (Pollux proceeds to quote Diphilos and Alexis); Hesych. s.v.; Wachsmuth l.c. 462. Plato adopts this arrangement in Leges ix. 849E, and xi. 915D.

^{page 207 note 7} E.g. Aristoph. Vesp. 789; Antiphanes ap. Athen, vii. 287E; Alexis ap. Athen, iii. 104D.

^{page 207 note 8} Dem. De fals. leg. xix. 272, p. 417. Aristoph. Av. 13 οὑκ τῶν ὀρνέων and Schol. ad. loc. (Rutherford, , Schol. Aristoph. i. 427. 8Google Scholar).

^{page 207 note 9} Aristoph. Lys. 557; Alexis op. Athen, viii. 338E; Diphilos ap. Athen, vi. 227E.

^{page 208 note 1} moeris s.v σήσαμα

^{page 208 note 2} Wachsmuth l.c. 483. Pollux ix. 48 explains the word differently, as the places where cooks were hired.

^{page 208 note 3} C. Plaut. Aulul. 280 f. postquam obsonavit erus et conduxit coquos = tibicinasque has apud forum. Wachsmuth, l.c. 491; Becker, Charikles ii. 318 foll.

^{page 208 note 4} Plaut. loc. cit.; Theophylact. Ep. 12; Theophr. Char. 11.

^{page 208 note 5} Pollux ix. 47 (quoting Eupolis) περιῆλθον εἰς τὰ σκόροδα καὶ τὰ κρόμμυα καὶ τὸν λιβανωτόν κεὐθύ τῶν ἀρωμάτων Athenaeus xv. 691C.

^{page 208 note 6} Athen, ix. 374B Pollux l.c.

^{page 208 note 7} Pollux ix. 78 ἐκαλεῖτο δέ τις ᾿Αθήνησιν ἱματιόπωλις ἀγορά . According to an almost certain restoration of Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, we have in C.I.A. ii. 772B 2 [ἀ]κέστριαν (female tailor) a word which occurs in Lucian, Rhet. Praec. 24.

^{page 208 note 8} Pollux ix. 47; Aristoph. Lys. 557.

^{page 208 note 9} Bekker, , Anecdota Graeca i. 316Google Scholar. 23. Wachsmuth, , op. cit. i. 180.Google Scholar

^{page 208 note 10} Pollux x. 19. Wachsmuth, l.c. 462, n. 2, 490, n. 2.

^{page 209 note 1} Wachsmuth, l.c. 488.

^{page 209 note 2} Pollux vii. 193; Lucian, Hermot. c. 58. Cf. Suid. and Etym. Magn. s.v. The κάπηλοι were proverbially knavish, as we learn from Greek writers from Aeschylus downwards; Wallon, (Mém. de l'Acad. des Inscr. et Belles-Lettres vol. XIX. 2, p. 271Google Scholar, n. 2), calls attention to the fact that ‘chez les chrétiens, le métier de κάπηλος fut regardé comme tellement vil, qu'il était défendu è l'évêquê d'accueillir l'offrande de ceux qui l'exerçaient (Constit. apost. iv. 6, t. i. p. 294).’

^{page 209 note 3} In Plato, Resp. ii. 373c the κουρεῖς appear in company with παιδαγωγοί, τίτθαι, τροφοί, κομ μώτριαι Plut, de Garnil. 509?, refers to their proverbial talkativeness, which is also alluded to in Archelaus'celebrated reply preserved in Plut. Apophthegm, p. 177A ᾿Αδολέσχου κουρέως ἐρωτήσαντος αὐτὸν ῾πῶς σε κείρω ᾿῾σιωπῶν ᾿ ἔφη Cf. Athen, iii. 98E; Aristoph. Plutus, 338; Av. 1441.

^{page 209 note 4} Aristoph. Thesm. 491; Xen. Hell. 5. 4. 42; Plut. Mor. 130E; Plato, Lysis. 208B, etc.

^{page 209 note 5} [Dem.] xlii. p. 1040. 28; Plut, de cohib. ira 461A; Pollux vii. 56. 148; Macho, ap. Athen. 582c.

^{page 209 note 6} Pollux vii. 131 τῷ φορτηγῷ ἐπὶ τῶν τὰ φορτία ἀγόντων ἐμπόρων κέχρηται Αἰσχύλος . . . . . .φόρτα κας μέντοι ἠ παλαιἀ κωμῳδία τοὺς ἀχθοφροῦντας ἐκ τοῦ ἐμπορίου καλεῖ Cf. Lycophr. 1293 φορτηγοὶ λύκοι

^{page 209 note 7} Moeris, s.v.; Suid. s.v. ὀ κεράμις μισθοῦ φέρων The latter quotes Menander Ραπιζομένη for ἀμφορεαφόροσ (I do not understand why it appears as an adjective in L. and S. ) and Aristophanes ῾´ Ηρωεσ for ἀμφορεαφορεῖν (Arist. Frag. 285. 3). Neither L. and S. nor the Thesaurus refers to Pollux vii. 130.

^{page 209 note 8} Ασκοφόρος ἀσκοφορεῖν occur only in Bekker Anecd. Graec. 214; Etym. Magn. p. 155; Suid. s.v. τὸ ἐν ταῖς Διονυσιακαῖς πομπαῖς τοὺς ἀστοὺς . . . ἀστοὺς κατὰ τῶν ὤμων φέρειν καὶ οἰ τοῦτο ποιοῦντες ἀσκοφόροι καλοῦνται(Bekker l.c.).

^{page 210 note 1} Harpocr. s.v. Κολωναίτασ (s. Κολωνέτας): Wachsmuth op. cit. i. 177 foll. ii. 277. Plato, Resp. ii. 371E; Polit. 290A; Aristoph. Av. 1152.

^{page 210 note 2} The word bears the sense of messenger in Aesch. Prom. 942; Soph. Phil. 497; Aristot. Eth. N. vii. 6 Κολωνέτας It appears to be used for one who waits at table in Athen, x. 420E τὸν οἰνοχόον τὸν διάκονον τὸν μάγειρον

^{page 210 note 3} See note on inscription no. IV. iii. 1. 16.

^{page 210 note 4} In one case only, I believe, is the term used for a boy—Insc. VI. ii. 10. 11.

^{page 210 note 5} De Cor. xviii. 162, p. 269. 20; dé fals, leg. xix. 109, p. 371. 21 πανοῦργος καὶ θεοῖς ἐχθροσ καὶ γραμματεὺσ Lept. xx. 178, p. 506. 20.

^{page 211 note 1} xxx. 36. Cf. Antiphon, vi. 35.

^{page 211 note 2} The word occurs only in Plut. Pericl. 12 οἰ δὲ κατὰ γῆν ἀμαξοπηγοὶ καὶ ζευγοτρόφοι καὶ ἠνιοχοι καὶ καλωστρόφοι καὶ λινουργοὶ καὶ σκυτοτόμοι καὶ ὀδοποιοὶ καὶ μεταλλεῖσ it is to be noticed that the company in which they here appear is far from being aristocratic. The verb ζευγοτροφῶ appears in Pollux viii. 132 ζευγήσιόν τι τέλος οἰ ζευγοτροφοῦντες ἐτέλουν

In reviewing the various occupations mentioned in the ‘catalogi paterarum agentearum,’ I have purposely omitted the στιχιστήσ of Inscr. I. 7, being unable to say anything as to his function, and feeling uncertain of his very existence.

^{page 226 note 1} In the former case this would be one of the latest examples, if not absolutely the latest, of the representation of the pseudo-diphthong ει by a simple E. With reference to this pseudodiphthongal ει Meisterhans (Gramm. der Att. Inschr. ³ § 10. 15. p. 20) says: ‘Der Uebergang von der Schreibung E zu der heute üblichen Schreibweise EI vollzieht sich in einem mehr als zweihundertjährigen Zeitraum; denn die ersten, freilich ganz vereinzelten Spuren der diphthongischen Schreibweise führen in den Anfang des VI. Jahrhunderts hinauf: ᾿ Ειμί neben μελεδαίν Εν (Infinitiv, c. 570V. Chr.), und die letzten Spuren der monophthongischen Schreibweise lassen sich verfolgen bis in die zweite Hälfte des IV. Jahrhunderts: ἀποδώς Εν (Infinitiv, 334 v. Chr.).’ Cf. C.I.A. i. 437.8