Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:57:52.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rods of Digenis: an Ancient Marble Quarry in Eastern Crete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Abstract

The paper describes a small ancient quarry in white and red variegated marble, located near Sitia in Eastern Crete. By examining the geological setting of marble occurrences in the district, and comparing the style of stoneworking with those reported from other ancient quarrying sites, it is possible to assess the viability of Cretan marble as a local building material in Classical times, and to speculate upon the role of one particular small quarry in providing such building material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acknowledgements. We are grateful for the advice and encouragement of C. Davaras, Ephor of Antiquities for eastern Crete, and for the kind co-operation of N. Platon. Special thanks are due to M. S. F. Hood, who originally inspired this investigation and who has freely given his help and guidance since its outset.

1 Robertson, D. S., A Handbook of Greek and Roman Architecture, 2nd edn. (C.U.P., 1943).Google Scholar

2 Ward-Perkins, J. B., ‘Quarrying in Antiquity: Technology, Tradition and Social Change’, Mortimer Wheeler Archaeological Lecture, ProcBritAc 57 (1972) 124.Google Scholar

3 Strabo, , Geography XXII. viii. 14.Google Scholar

4 Sanders, I. F., Roman Crete (Aris & Phillips, 1982) 34.Google Scholar

5 Topographic map of Crete, 3rd edn. (1944).

6 We are grateful to Mr. Pantelis Kampanos, Mayor of Chamezi, who accompanied us on our first visit in 1980.

7 Platon, N., KrChron (1953) 489.Google Scholar Cf. JHS 74 (1954) 51; BCH 78 (1954) 156.

8 Baumann, A., Best, G., Gwosdz, W., and Wachendorf, H., ‘The Nappe Pile of Eastern Crete’, Tectonophysics 30 (1976) 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Exploitation of the local hydrogeological conditions is seen in the Minoan house at Chamezi, where a cistern (‘Riesenzisterne’ of Noak, Ovalhaus und Palast in Kreta (Teubner, B. G., Leipzig 1908) 58Google Scholar) has been sunk through the limestone aquifer into an impermeable phyllite base.

10 Graben: a (relatively) downfaulted topographic trough, between high angle faults parallel to its long axis.

11 Gradstein, F. M., ‘The Neogene and Quaternary Deposits in the Sitia District of Eastern Crete’, Annales géologiques des pays helléniques 24 (1973) 527–72.Google Scholar There is also some evidence for ancient quarrying of the Skopi sandstone formation.

12 Several destructive earthquakes between 368 B.C. and A.D. 448 are listed by Thommeret, Y., Thommeret, J., Laborel, J., Montaggioni, L. F., and Pirazzoli, P. A., ‘Late Holocene Shoreline Changes and Seismotectonic Displacements in Western Crete (Greece)’, Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Suppl. 40 (1981) 127–49.Google Scholar

13 i.e. vertical before the marble mass foundered.

14 Platon's reference (op. cit.) to capitals may perhaps have included this object.

15 Such finds are rare indeed. A few examples are given by Dworakowska, A. in Quarries in Ancient Greece, Bibliotheca Antiqua 14 (1975) 42–4.Google Scholar

16 Ward-Perkins, J. B., ‘Quarries and Stoneworking in the Early Middle Ages: the Heritage of the Ancient World’, Settimane di Studio del Centro Italiano di Studi sull' Alto Medioevo 18 i (1971) 525–44. specifically 532.Google Scholar

17 Bowles, O., ‘The Technology of Marble Quarrying’, Bulletin U.S. Bureau of Mines 106, Mineral Technology 13 (1916) 137.Google Scholar

18 Notably the colossus at Apollonia, Naxos.

19 (a) Wedges, described by Kraus, T., Röder, J., and Müller-Wiener, W., ‘Mons Claudianus Mons Porphyrites’, Mitteilungen des deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abt. Kairo 22 (1967) 109205.Google Scholar (b) Abrasives, mentioned by Pliny, Naturalis Historia XXXVI. ix. 51.

20 Clarke, S. and Engelbach, R., Ancient Egyptian Masonry (O.U.P., 1930) 17.Google Scholar

21 Casson, S., The Technique of Greek Sculpture (O.U.P., 1933).Google Scholar

22 T. Kraus et al., op. cit. (n. 19); Asgari, N., ‘Roman and Early Byzantine Marble Quarries of Proconnessus’, Proc. 10th International Congress of Classical Archaeology, Ankara-İzmir, 23–30 Sept. 1973, ed. Akurgal, E., 1 and 3 (1978) 467–80 and pl. 135–42.Google Scholar

23 Kourouniotes, K. and Thompson, H. A., ‘The Pnyx in Athens’, Hesperia 1 (1932) 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Thompson, H. A., ‘Pnyx and Thesmophorion’, Hesperia 5 (1936) 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 A. Dworakowska, op. cit. (n. 15) discussed in some detail (p. 23 n. 77) the tenuous nature of evidence for dating quarrying operations here.

26 Casson, S., ‘An Unfinished Colossal Statue at Naxos’, BSA 37 (19361937) 21–5 and plates.Google Scholar

27 Pliny, , Naturalis Historia xxxvi. iv. 14.Google Scholar

28 Quoted and discussed by Drachmann, A. G., The Mechanical Technology of Greek and Roman Antiquity (Univ. Wisconsin Press, Copenhagen 1963)Google Scholar.

29 (a) a more complete version, in Arabic; (b) parts of the original text in Greek, cited by Pappos.

30 A. G. Drachmann, op. cit. (n. 28).

31 It is not known with certainty when Heron of Alexandria (ὁ μηχανικός) lived. Drachmann (op. cit.) is of the opinion that Heron should be dated about A.D. 62, but discusses (p. 9) various other views.

32 Pliny, op. cit. XXXVI. iv. 9, says that the first men to make a name for themselves as marble workers came from Crete, and can be dated to the 50th Olympiad (580–577 B.C.).

33 The archaeological site of Phalasarna is thought to be Hellenistic and that of Praessos to be Eteo-Cretan to Roman in age; the quarries associated with these two sites have not themselves been dated, but seem to show characteristics of Hellenistic quarrying.

34 Broneer, O., Corinth The Odeum 10 (American School of Classical Studies, 1932) 142 and fig. 10.Google Scholar This author tells of ‘extensive quarrying carried on in both Greek and Roman times’, and considers that the quarry had been in use until the 1st cent. A.D. The south-east side of the quarry (fig. 10) is not unlike the earlier parts of the Rods of Digenis quarry.

35 N. Platon, op. cit.

36 A. Dworakowska, op. cit. (n. 15) comments (p. 37): ‘The monolithic column shafts, if made of coloured marble, should generally be dated to the Roman period.’ Whether this generality extends to Crete we cannot say, but are inclined to think that Hellenistic examples (e.g. Lebena) are also to be found on the island.

37 Ward-Perkins, J. B., ‘The Marble Trade and its Organisation: Evidence from Nicomedia’, American Academy in Rome 36 (1980) 325–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Hankey, V., ‘A Marble Quarry at Karystos’, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 18 (1965) 5361.Google Scholar

39 J. B. Ward-Perkins, op. cit. (1980), referring to Karystos.

40 N. Asgari, op. cit. (n. 22).

41 Mr. Pantelis Kampanos informed us that a broken column was lying in a gully near Galanou Kefali, about 2 km to the east of the quarry.

42 I. F. Sanders, op. cit. (n. 4) 69 and pl. 27.

43 Falkener, E., ‘A Description of some Important Theatres and Other Remains in Crete, from a ms. History of Candia by Onorio Belli in 1586’, Suppl. to Museum of Antiquities (1854).Google Scholar

44 Sieber, F. W., Travels in the Island of Crete in the Year 1817 (Richard Phillip & Co., 1823) 94.Google Scholar

45 I. F. Sanders, op. cit. (no. 4) 137, ref. 1/31.

46 Renfrew, C. and Peacey, J. Springer. ‘Aegean Marble: a Petrological Study’, BSA 63 (1968) 4566 pl. 11–13Google Scholar; Ashmole, B., ‘Aegean Marble: Science and Common Sense’, BSA 65 (1970) 12.Google Scholar

47 We are grateful to Dr. E. H. Rutter for assistance in the interpretation of marble fabrics.

48 See section on Geology of the Phyllite Nappe, below.

49 The method used is described by Thompson, M., Ramsay, M., and Coles, B. J., ‘Interactive Matrix Matching: a New Method of Correcting Interference Effects in Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry’, Analyst 107 (1982) 1286–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar We are grateful to Dr. M. Thompson and Dr. M. Ramsay for their co-operation. CaO values quoted are subject to an error of ± 1 per cent; FeO and Fe2O3 proportions were calculated from total iron on the assumption that iron in the carbonate fraction is Fe2+ and the remainder is Fe3+.

50 Dissolution in mild acids is not a totally reliable method of separating carbonates from non-carbonates. Robinson, P., in ‘Determination of Calcium, Magnesium, Manganese, Strontium and Iron in the Carbonate Fraction of Limestones and Dolomites’, Chemical Geology 28 (1980) 135–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar, discusses the uncertainties. HCl effectively dissolves the magesium carbonates, but can leach ions from clay minerals.

51 Preparation was by LiBO2 fusion, as described by Watkins, P. J. and Thompson, M. (in press), Geostandards Newsletter (1983).Google Scholar Determination of SiO2 by the method of Maxwell, J. A., Rock and Mineral Analysis (Interscience, New York 1968), 339–40.Google Scholar The assistance of P. J. Watkins is gratefully acknowledged.

52 Loss on ignition conducted according to the method of Wolf, K. H., Easton, A. J., and Warne, S., ‘Techniques of Examining and Analyzing Carbonate Skeletons, Minerals and Rocks’ in Carbonate Rocks (Elsevier Publishing Co., 1967) 253341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 See section on Geology of the Phyllite Nappe, below.

54 e.g. Conforto, L., Felici, M., Monna, D., Serva, L., and Taddeucci, A., ‘A Preliminary Evaluation of Chemical Data (Trace Element) from Classical Marble Quarries in the Mediterranean’, Archaeometry 17 (1975) 210–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 e.g. Germann, K., Holzmann, G., and Winkler, F. J., ‘Determination of Marble Provenance: Limits of Isotopic Analysis’, Archaeometry 22 (1980) 99106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 See section on Geology of the Phyllite Nappe, below.

57 L. Conforto et al., op. cit. (n. 54).

58 Rybach, L. and Nissen, H.-U., ‘Neutron Activation of Mn and Na Traces in Marbles Worked by the Ancient Greeks’ in Proc. Symposium on Radiochemical Methods of Analysis, held by the International Atomic Energy Agency at Salzburg, 19–23 Oct. 1964, 1 (1965) 105–17.Google Scholar

59 Namely, a few hundred ppm. The Ca/Sr ratios reported by Lazzarini, L., Moschini, G., and Stievano, B. M., in ‘A Contribution to the Identification of Italian, Greek and Anatolian Marbles through a Petrological Study and the Evaluation of Ca/Sr Ratio’, Archaeometry 22 (1980) 173–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar, seem to be at variance with the Sr values reported from the same localities by other authors.

60 Warren, P., Minoan Stone Vases (C.U.P., 1969) 135.Google Scholar

61 Chalikiopoulos, L., ‘Sitia, die Osthalbinsel Kretas’, Veröff. d. Inst. für Meereskunde und d. Geogr. Inst, an der Universität Berlin 4 (1903) 1138.Google Scholar

62 A. Baumann et al., op. cit. (n. 8).

63 Creutzburg, N. and Seidel, E., ‘Zum Stand der Geologie der Präneogens auf Kreta’, Neues Jahrbuch Geol. Paläont. Abhandlungen 149 (1975) 363–83.Google Scholar

64 Seidel, E., Kreuzer, H., and Harre, W., ‘K/Ar Dates of the Cretan Phyllite-Quartzite Series’, Proc. VI Colloquium on the Geology of the Aegean Region, Athens, 3 (1977) 121–7.Google Scholar

65 Adapted after Baumann et al., op. cit. (n. 8).

66 For an up-to-date review of this complex subject, the reader is referred to the recent publication edited by MacClay, K. R. and Price, N. J., Thrust and Nappe Tectonics, Special Publication of the Geological Society of London, 9 (1981).Google Scholar

67 Not all authors uphold the plate tectonic interpretation of this region, e.g. Baumann et al., cited in n. 69 below.

68 Aubouin, J., Geosynclines (Elsevier Publishing Co., 1965).Google Scholar

69 Baumann, A., Best, G., and Wachendorf, H., ‘Die alpinischen Stockwerke der südlichen Ägäis’, Geologische Rundschau 66 (1977) 492522. table 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70 A. Baumann et al., op. cit. (n. 8).

71 Wachendorf, H., Baumann, A., Gwosdz, W., and Schneider, W., ‘Die ‘Phyllite-Serie’ Ostretas eine Melange’, Z. Deutsch. Geol. Ges. 125 (1974) 237–51.Google Scholar The mechanisms are explained by Best, G. and Wachendorf, H., ‘Nappe Tectonics and Principles of Melange Formation in Eastern Crete’, Proc. VI Colloquium on the Geology of the Aegean Region, Athens, 3 (1977) 8995.Google Scholar

72 According to Hsü, K. J., in ‘Mélanges and their distinction from Olistostromes’, Modern and Ancient Geosynclinal Sedimentation, Society of Economic: Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication no. 19 (1974) 321–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ‘Mélanges are bodies of deformed rocks characterized by the inclusion of tectonically mixed fragments or blocks, which may range up to several miles long, in a pervasively sheared matrix.’

73 P. Warren, op. cit. (n. 60) and subsequent works.

74 Baranyi, I., Lippolt, H. J., and Todt, W., ‘Kalium-Argon Datierungen an zwei Magmatiten von Kalo Chorio, Nord-Ost Kreta’, Neues Jahrbuch Geol. Paläont., Monatshefte (1975) 257–62.Google Scholar

75 Seidel, E., Okrusch, M., Kreuzer, H., Rashka, H., and Harre, W., ‘Eo-Alpine Metamorphism in the Uppermost Unit of the Cretan Nappe System—Petrology and Geochronology. Part II, Synopsis of High Temperature Metamorphics and Associated Ophiolites’, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 76 (1981) 351 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76 N. Creutzburg et al., Geological map of Crete, 2 sheets, 1: 200,000 (1977).