Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T09:51:09.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Figured Krater from Knossos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Jonathan H. Musgrave  and
Hugh Sackett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the summer of 1975 several rescue excavations at building sites in the Knossos area were undertaken by the British School, at the request of the Heraklion ephorate of antiquities. In the two areas investigated, Protogeometric or Geometric tombs and tomb deposits were found. The krater published here comes from one of these, and was found in a partly destroyed chamber tomb at Tekke (now Ambelokipi) about one kilometre to the north of Knossos. The site is near the Tekke crossroads, no more than 15 metres from the main Knossos to Heraklion road, on the south side of the minor road, and in the property of A. Kiladhi, plan FIG. 1. The tombs or pottery deposits labelled A to D on this plan, though productive, were in most cases disturbed, and need further study before publication is possible; we are here concerned only with Tomb E.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 71 , November 1976 , pp. 117 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Brothwell, D. R.Digging Up Bones. London: British Museum (Natural History), 1972.Google Scholar
Camps, F. E., and Cameron, J. M.Practical Forensic Medicine. Revised edn. (London, 1971).Google Scholar
Cleaver, F. H. ‘A contribution to the biometric study of the human mandible.’ Biometrika, xxix (1937), 80–112.Google Scholar
Dorsey, G. A. ‘A sexual study of the size of the articular surfaces of the long bones in aboriginal American skeletons.’ Boston Med. Surg. J., exxxvii (1897), 80–2.Google Scholar
Dwight, T. ‘The size of the articular surfaces of the long bones as characteristics of sex; an anthropological study.’ Am. J. Anat., iv (1905), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genoves, S. ‘Sex determination in earlier man.’ In Science and Archaeology. Edd. Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E.. Ch. 37, 429–39. 2nd edn. (London, 1969).Google Scholar
Gray's Anatomy. 35th edn. (1973). Edd. Warwick, R. and Williams, P. L.. London.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J. ‘Examination of the two skeletons in respect of sex, age and stature.’ In Medical and Scientific Investigations in the Christie Case. Ed. Camps, F. E.. Ch. 5, 74–99 (London, 1953).Google Scholar
Hood, M. S. F.The Minoans. Crete in the Bronze Age (London, 1971).Google Scholar
Hughes, D. R. ‘A study of a series of mandibles from the Mulu Cave, Sarawak.’ J. R. Anthrop. Inst., xciii (1963), 235–49.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, R. W.Prehistoric Crete (Harmondsworth, 1962).Google Scholar
Krogman, W. M.The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine (Springfield, 1962).Google Scholar
Mant, K. ‘Recent work on changes after death.’ In Modern Trends in Forensic Medicine. Ed. Simpson, K.. Ch. 4, 80–97 (London, 1953).Google Scholar
Martin, E. S. ‘A study of an Egyptian series of mandibles, with special reference to mathematical methods of sexing.’ Biometrika, xxviii (1936), 149–78.Google Scholar
Morant, G. M. ‘A biometric study of the human mandible.’ Biometrika, xxviii (1936), 84–122.Google Scholar
Parsons, F. G. ‘The characters of the English thigh bone.’ J. Anat. Lond. xlviii (1914), 238–67.Google Scholar
Pearson, K., and Bell, J. ‘A study of the long bones of the English skeleton.’ Drap. Co. Res. Mem. Biom., Ser. x (1919).Google Scholar
Stewart, T. D. ‘Identification by the skeletal structures.’ In Gradwohl's Legal Medicine. Ed. Gamps, F. E.. Ch. 11, 123–54. 2nd edn. (Bristol, 1968).Google Scholar
Stewart, T. D. ‘Recent improvements in estimating stature, sex, age and race from skeletal remains.’ In Modern Trends in Forensic Medicine, iii. Ed. Mant, A. K.. Ch. 9, 193–211 (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Thieme, F. P., and Schull, W. J. ‘Sex determination from the skeleton.’ Hum. Biol. xxix (1957), 242–73.Google Scholar