Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T04:45:41.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Bronze Age Apsidal and Oval Buildings in Greece and adjacent areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Extract

Apsidal and elliptical buildings are characteristic of rural societies. In Greece their tradition goes back to the late Neolithic period. Apsidal houses become common in the EH and especially the MH periods, while oval buildings do not occur as often. It is generally acknowledged that curvilinear plans went out of fashion at the end of the MH period and that they reappeared in the beginning of the EIA. This statement is fundamentally correct for rectangular constructions prevail throughout the Mycenaean era. Yet an attentive survey of LBA sites in Greece proves that curvilinear buildings were still constructed in certain regions. A rapid review of these sites could be beneficial, for it might help in elucidating some of the reasons of the resurgence of these particular building plans shortly after the final collapse of the Mycenaean civilization.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acknowledgements. This article is a revised version of an appendix of my Ph.D. dissertation, submitted in 1987 at the University of London. I wish to thank my supervisor, Professor J.N. Coldstream, for his valuable suggestions concerning this particular section of my thesis. I have bencfitted from friendly discussions or communications by Dr W. Coulson, Dr K. Kilian and Prof. W. Schiering. I am also grateful to the Greek Archaeological Society and its former secretary general the late Prof. G. Mylonas, for permission to consult J. Threpsiades' excavation notebook of Aulis (1959) and to publish the plan of the elliptical structure there. Lastly, I owe sincere thanks to the ‘A.S. Onassis’ Benefit Foundation which has partly supported financially the research for my Ph.D.

1 Concerning Neolithic, EH and MH curvilinear buildings see in general Sinos, S., Die vorklassischen Hausformen in der Ägäis, Mainz (1971) 21, 36f., 56f., 81–83Google Scholar; Sakellariou, M., Les Proto-Grecs, Athens (1980) 118126Google Scholar; Overback, J.C. III, A Study of Early Helladic Architecture, Ph.D. dissertation, Ann Arbor (1963) pl. II, IX–XII1, XXVII–XXXGoogle Scholar; Thompson, H.O., ‘Apsidal Construction in the Ancient Near East’, PEQ 101 (1969) 6986CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Konsola, D., Πϱομυϰηναϊϰή θήβα, Athens (1981) 5254, 106–109, 145–151Google Scholar;Η πρώϊμη αστιϰοποίηση στους Πρωτοελλαδιϰούς οιϰισμούς, Athens (1984) 61–68, 81–88; Dickinson, O.T.P.K., The Origins of Mycenaean Civilization, SIMA 49 (1977) 32fGoogle Scholar; Best, J.G.P., The Arrival of the Greeks, Amsterdam (1973) 1517, 20Google Scholar; ‘The Foreign Relations of the Apsis-House Culture in the Palestin’, Pulpudeva 2 (1976) 205—209; Warner, J., ‘The Megaron and Apsidal House in Early Bronze Western Anatolia; New Evidence from Karatas’, AJA 83 (1979) 133147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 McDonald, W.A./Howell, R.J., ADelt 29 (1973/1974) Chronika, 323, 325Google Scholar; Simpson, R. Hope, Hesperia 44 (1975) 80fGoogle Scholar; Rapp, J. Jr/Aschenbrenner, S.E. (ed.), Excavations at Nichoria in Southwest Greece I: Environs and Techniques, Minneapolis (1978) 118, 121f.Google Scholar

3 Hesperia 41 (1972) 243, fig. 6; Rapp/Aschenbrenner (supra n. 2) 118, fig. 8:2.

4 Valmin, N., The Swedish Messenia Expedition, Lund (1938) 175.Google Scholar

5 Personal communication by Dr K. Kilian. See also Catling, H.W., AR (1983/1984) 24Google Scholar and Touchais, G., BCH 108 (1984) 760.Google Scholar

6 Young, M., JHS 58 (1938) 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Benton, S./Water-house, H., ‘Excavations in Ithaca: Tris Langadas’, BSA 68 (1973) 124.Google Scholar

7 Soteriades, G., AE (1900) 171212Google Scholar; (1903) 75; PAE (1906) 136–139; Τα ελλειψοειδή ϰτίσματα του Θέρμου, Athens (1909); Rhomaios, K., ADelt 1 (1915) 225279Google Scholar; 2 (1916) 179–185; 6 (1920/21) 168; 9 (1924/25) Parartema, 4; PAE (1931) 64; (1932) 55f.

8 Robertson, D.S., Greek and Roman Architecture, Cambridge (1945)35153Google Scholar; Dinsmoor, W.B., The Architecture of Ancient Greece, London (1950)16, 42, 47fGoogle Scholar; Sinos (supra n. 1) 89f; Wardle, K.A., The Greek Bronze Age West of the Pindus, Ph.D. dissertation, London (1972) 5292Google Scholar; Rossi, R.F., Studi sull Etolia I, Trieste (1970) 1934.Google Scholar

9 Furumark, A., The Chronology of Mycenaean Pottery, Stockholm (1941) 49.Google Scholar

10 Wardle, K.A., ‘Cultural Groups of the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age in North-West Greece’, Godišnjak 15 (1977) 168172Google Scholar, fig. 5–7.

11 Benton, S., BSA 32 (1932) 239Google Scholar; Simpson, R. Hope/Dickinson, O.T.P.K., A Gazetteer of Aegean Civilisation in the Bronze Age I, SIMA 52 (1979) 104.Google Scholar

12 Wardle (supra n. 10) 164.

13 PAE (1906) 136f;Τα ελλειψοειδή ϰτίσματα του Θέρμου, Athens (1909) 10f.

14 Wardle (supra n. 10) 164 where it is noted that an EIA sherd was discovered in House α4.

15 Rhomaios, K., ADelt 1 (1915) 227229.Google Scholar

16 Lerat, L., RA 11/12 (1938) 192207, esp. 195, 197.Google Scholar

17 Pouilloux, J., Topographie et Architecture. La région nord du sanctuaire, FdD II (1960) plan 24.Google Scholar

18 The following details derive from the study of the plan in Threpsiades' note book. See also PAE (1959) 32 where the excavator mentions the discovery of these walls, which he identifies as peribolos walls.

19 Theocharis, D., PAE (1961) 47491Google ScholarErgon (1961) 52f.

20 Hansel, B., ‘Ergebnisse der Grabungen bei Kastanas in Zentral Makedonien, 1975–1978’, Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 26 (1979) 167202, esp. 174f., 182–186.Google Scholar

21 Heurtley, W. A., Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 12 (1925) 29f.Google Scholar; Prehistoric Macedonia, Cambridge (1939) 33, 35.

22 Dakaris, K., PAE (1967) 37. 3943.Google Scholar

23 Wardle (supra n. 10) 159, 176—187.

24 Korkuti, M., ‘Die Siedlungen der späten Bronze-und der Frühen Eisenzeit in Sudwest Albanien’, in Sudosteuropa zwischen 1600 und 1000 v. Chr., ed. Hänsel, B., Berlin (1982) 235253, esp. 243–248, fig. 8 at p. 242.Google Scholar See also Andrea, Z., AR (1983/1984) 116.Google Scholar

25 Pentazos, E., PAE (1971) 92Google Scholar; (1972) 86–89. The majority of the houses seem to be circular.

26 Schiering, W., IstMitt 9/10 (1959/1960) 78Google Scholar, Beilage 3. For a general plan of the LBA settlement see Voigtländer, W., ‘Zur Topographie Milets’, AA (1985) 87, fig. 10.Google Scholar

27 As Professor Schiering kindly informed me, the pottery which may be connected with these walls seems to be of the kind shown in IstMitt 9/10 (1959/60) pl. 8,2 & 9,1.

28 Kontis, J.D., PAE (1959) 195Google Scholar; Ergon (1959) 133f.; Simpson, R. Hope, Mycenaean Greece, Park Ridge (1981) 200.Google Scholar

29 Concerning the Italian excavations in the same area see Morricone, L., ASAtene 52/53 (1972/1973) 139396.Google Scholar

30 The excavator's note book does not contain further information than that in PAE, except that the edifice appears to have been oriented approximately N–S.

31 Warren, P., AR (1982/1983) 70f., 78.Google Scholar

32 Sakellarakis, J., PAE (1982) 468480Google Scholar; Ergon (1982) 55f.; Winter, N.A., AJA 88 (1984) 52f.Google Scholar

33 Quagliati, Q., NSc (1900) 411464Google Scholar; Taylour, Lord W., Mycenaean Pottery in Italy and Adjacent Areas, Cambridge (1958) 81126, 134.Google Scholar

34 See also a curious oval-like building of LM IA date at Phtellos in Thera [Doumas, Ch., AE (1973) 161–6Google Scholar, fig. 1 at p. 162; Building Δ].

35 Lauter, H., Lathuresa. Beitrage zur Architektur und Siedlungsgeschichte in spätgeometrischer Zeit, Mainz (1985) 33.Google Scholar

36 Such as the monumental apsidal building at Toumba (Lefkandi), Unit IV–I at Nichoria, or the apsidal edifice in the Karmaniola area at Asine. For references see Ainian, A. Mazarakis, ‘Early Greek Temples: Their Origin and Function’, in Early Greek Cult Practice (Skrifter utgivna av Svenska institutet i Athen XXXVIII) 106, 116.Google Scholar

37 Koukounara: Marinatos, S., PAE (1959) 175Google Scholar; Ergon (1959) 117f; Tiryns: Kilian, K., AA (1981) 155Google Scholar, fig. 5; (1982) 410, fig. 23.

38 See also the LM IA building at Phtellos: Doumas (supra n. 34).

39 Wardle (supra n. 10) 159, 164; BICS 22 (1975) 206, 208.

40 RA 11/12 (1938) 205.

41 (supra n. 10) 176–187, esp. 177.

42 Concerning Kastanas see C. Podzuweit, in Hänsel (supra n. 20) 203–223.

43 Shelmerdine, C.W., AJA 85 (1981) 319325CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McDonald, W.A., Hesperia 44 (1975) 137140CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chadwick, J., The Mycnaean World, Cambridge (1976) 47f.Google Scholar

44 Hope Simpson/Dickinson (supra n. 11) 273.

45 For a list of such building models see Mavriyiannaki, K., ‘Modellini fittili di costruzioni circolari della Creta minoica’, SMEA 15 (1972) 161170.Google Scholar

46 Sakellariou, M. [ASAtene 59 (1981) 343347 & (supra n. 1) 118–126]Google Scholar, Lorimer, H.L. [Homer and the Monuments, London (1950) 438f.]Google Scholar, Syriopoulous, K. [Οι Μεταβατιϰοί Χϱόνοι, Athens (1984) 1060, 1066]Google Scholar are among those who maintain this theory.

47 47 See for instance Howell, R.J., in Bronze Age Migrations the Aegean, ed. Crossland, R.A./Birchall, A., Park Ridge (1974) 82Google Scholar: ‘The apsidal house does not occur in EH II’; Best, J.G.P., The Arrival of the Greeks I, Amsterdam (1973) 15f.Google Scholar

48 Konsola, D., Πϱομνϰηναϊϰη θήβα, Athens (1981) 149151Google Scholar and Sakellariou (supra n. 1) 119f with references.

49 It is with such criteria thai one should examine for instance the discovery of the late SMyc house at Tiryns or the reappearance of free-standing curvilinear houses at Old Smyrna around 750 B.C. and especially during the last quarter of the 8th c., alter a long period during which buildings were rectangular. The problem of Old Smyrna was discussed during the congress at the Italian School in Athens in 1979 [ASAtene 59 ( 1981) 344] but the participants failed to suggest a suitable explanation. R.V. Nicholls (letter ol March 23, 1986) suggests that these may indicate an influx of refugees from the country; this assumption is based on the postulate that it is easier to build an apsidal or oval edifice than a rectangular one. For this and other reasons R.V. Nicholls would be willing to lower the traditional dating of the capture of Smyrna by the Ionians of Colophon [Herodotus I, 143, 3 and I, 150; Huxley, G.L., The Early Ionians, New York (1966 24. 36, 47Google Scholar; Boardman, J., The Greeks Overseas, London (1980)329Google Scholar: Coldstream, J.N., Geometric Greece, London (1977) 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar and n. 90 at p. 270; Akurgal, E., Alt-Smyrna I, Ankara (1983) 27Google Scholar and Cook, J.M., BSA 53/54 (1958/1959) 13f.]Google Scholar in the period which immediately-preceded the earthquake of c. 700 B.C. The question naturally remains open.

50 Griechische Baukunst in geometrischer Zeit, Archaeologia Homerica II. O, Göttingen (1969) 79f. and 85–87.

51 Parthenon and the Mycenaean Gity on the Heights, Copenhagen (1976) 151.

52 An interesting discussion of the problems related to the apsidal and oval plans can be found in ASAtene 59 (1981) 343–347.

53 Aristotle, Pol., 1252 b15–26.

54 Coldstream (supra n. 49) 304; ASAtene 59 (1981) 344.

55 Clemmensen, M., ‘Primitive hustyper i Aitolien’, Geografisk Tidsskrift 3/4 (1933) 121Google Scholar; Dyggve, E., Das Laphrion der Tempelbezirk von Kalydon, Kobenhavn (1948) 324331Google Scholar; Wells, B., ‘Absidhuset – en 5000 – arig tradition i Grekland’, Medusa 1:1 (1980) 3848Google Scholar: Dictz, S., Asine I, 1, Stockholm (1982) 52f.Google Scholar

56 This reasoning is also present in Chadwick, J., ‘Who were the Dorians?’, PdP 166 (1976) 103117Google Scholar and ‘The Mycenaean Dorians’, BICS 23 (1976) 115f. who assumes that the return of the Heraclids could apply to families which by moving south re-occupied lands that belonged to their ancestors in MH times. This is however debatable, for one should first prove that people of M H descent were driven away from their homes by the Mycenaeans, a fact which has not been demonstrated by excavations yet. For a roughly comparable opinion to Chadwicka's see Deshayes, J., Argos. Les fouilles de la Deiras, Paris (1966) 241251.Google Scholar