Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T01:35:54.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oxhide Copper Ingots in Crete and Cyprus and the Bronze Age Metals Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

N. H. Gale  and
Z. A. Stos-Gale
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lead isotope and neutron activation analyses of second millennium BC copper ingots are described. Examples from Cyprus, from the Mathiati hoard, and from Skouriotissa are consistent, and show similarities with Late Cypriot bronze artefacts from Hala Sultan Teke and Ayios Dhimitrios. Analysis of the Hagia Triada ingots shows that these Cretan examples were not imports from Cyprus. The possibility that they used Cretan ores is discussed and rejected. It is tentatively suggested they may be of Anatolian origin. It is clear that the Late Bronze Age metal trade was organized on a more complex basis than was previously assumed to be the case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 81 , November 1986 , pp. 81 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acknowledgements. We are very grateful to Professor Y. Sakellarakis both for allowing us to take samples from the Hagia Triadha ingots and for his generous assistance and advice. We wish to thank A. Fountoulakis for his valuable assistance in sampling the ingots and Dr H. W. Catling and other members of the British School at Athens for their continued support for and assistance with our work in Greece. This work was supported by grants from the Science and Engineering Research Council, NATO (Grant No. 574/83), and the Leverhulme Trust.

1 Principally Buchholz, H. G., PZ 37 (1959) 1–40Google Scholar and Schweizer Munzblätter 16 (1966) 62: Bass, G. F., Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 57 (8) (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and in Orient and Occident: Festschrift Cyrus H. Gordon (Kevelaer 1973) 29–38.

2 The scientific work on oxhide ingots has chiefly been conducted by R. Maddin, J. D. Muhly, R. F. Tylecote, and U. Zwicker. A complete list of the relevant publications is encompassed in the publications: Muhly, J. D., Acts of the International Archaeological Symposium ‘The Relations Between Cyprus and Crete, ca.2000–500 B.C.’ (Nicosia 1979) 87–100Google Scholar and in Early Metallurgy in Cyprus (Nicosia 1982) 251–69.

3 See Buchholz, op. cit. and Bass, op. cit. (n. 1 above).

4 Lo Schiavo, F., Rend. Linc. xxxv, fasc. 5–6 (1980) 379–88.Google Scholar

5 Dimitriov, B., Int. J. Nautical Archaeology 8 (1979) 70–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 See the discussion by Bass (1967), op. cit (n. 1 above).

7 Bass, op. cit (1967) (see n. 1 above).

8 Bass, G. F., Frey, D. A., and Pulak, C., Int. J. Nautical Archaeology 13 (4) (1984) 271–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Bass, op. cit. (1967), (see n. 1 above).

10 Seltman, C., Greek Coins (London 1955) 5 ff.Google Scholar; Kyrou, A. K., Nomismatika Chronika 1 (1972) 64–75.Google Scholar

11 See Buchholz, op. cit. (1959) and Bass, op. cit. (1967) (n. 1 above) for discussions of the variations in both shape and weight.

12 See Bass, op. cit. (1967) (n. 1 above).

13 Kempinski, A. and Košak, S., Tel Aviv 4 (1977) 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Catling, H. W., Cypriot Bronzework in the Mycenaean World (Oxford 1964).Google Scholar

15 Karageorghis, V. and Dernas, M., Pyla-Kokkinokremos (Nicosia 1984).Google Scholar

16 A. South-Todd, Report of the Department of Antiquities Cyprus (1983).

17 Betancourt, P., Wheeler, T. S., Maddin, R., and Muhly, J. D., MASCA Journal 1 (1978) 7–8.Google Scholar

18 Hood, S., Excavations in Chios (Oxford 1982) 665.Google Scholar

19 Caskey, J., Hesperia XL (1971) 388 pl. 75a.Google Scholar

20 Lo Schiavo, op. cit. (see n. 4 above).

21 One from Kourion, now in the British Museum, is described by Catling, op. cit. p. 205 pl. 34 (see n. 14 above); the other was published by Tushingham, A. D., Archaeology 32 (4) (1979) 53–5.Google Scholar

22 Schaeffer, C. F. A., Antiquity 39 (1965) 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar, pl. xvib, and Alasia i (Paris 1971) 505 ff.

23 Catling, , Alasia i (Paris 1971) 15–32.Google Scholar The statuette is in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford.

24 Karageorghis, V., Cyprus (London 1982) 103–4.Google Scholar

25 Bass, op. cit. (1967 and 1973) (see n. 1 above).

26 Karageorghis, op. cit. (1982) 104 (see n. 24 above).

27 The signs impressed or incised into many oxhide ingots have been compared with Cypro-Minoan, Linear A and Linear B, but Bass (1967, op. cit. in n. 1 above) has shown that no group of signs is uniquely related to any one of them. The signs cannot therefore be used to support a Cypriot origin for particular ingots.

28 The case for the equation Alashiya = Cyprus has recently been forcibly argued by Muhly, J. D., Proceedings First International Congress of Cypriot Studies i (Nicosia 1972) 201–10Google Scholar; the case against the equation was ably argued by R. S. Merrillees, ibid. 111–19.

29 Astrom, P., SCE iv (iD), 709–54Google Scholar and in Acts of the International Archaeological Symposium: The Relations Between Cyprus and Crete circa 2000–500 B.C. (Nicosia 1979) 122–7.

30 e.g. Enkomi, Hala Sultan Tekke, and Kition.

31 Tin, which was unavailable anywhere within the Aegean, seems an equally possible source of Western interest in Cyprus, which may have acted as a middleman for supplies coming from much further east, perhaps through Mari. See Gale, N. H. and Stos-Gale, Z. A., Report of the Department of Antiquities Cyprus (1985) 83–99.Google Scholar

32 Muhly, op. cit. (1979) (see n. 2 above) 94.

33 Catling, , Cyprus and the West 1600–1050 B.C. Ian Sanders Memorial Lecture (Sheffield 1980).Google Scholar

34 Ibid. 17–19.

35 Id., in Acts of the International Archaeological Symposium: The Relations between Cyprus and Crete, circa 2000–500 B.C. (Nicosia 1979) 69–75.

36 See, for instance, Bass, op. cit. (1967) 62–7 (n. 1 above), and Sakellarakis, E. and Sakellarakis, Y., Skrifter Utgivna av Svenska Institutet i Athen 4° xxxii (1984) 197–203.Google Scholar

37 For the typological classification of oxhide ingots, see Buchholz, op. cit. (1959), and Bass, op. cit. (1967) (n. 1 above).

38 Catling, , CAH 3 II/2 (Cambridge 1979) 188–216.Google Scholar

39 Faure, P., RAI (1966) 45–78Google Scholar and in Proceedings Second International Congress of Cretan Studies, ii (Athens 1968) 174–83.

40 Merrillees, , Trade and Transcendence in the Bronze Age Levant, SIMA xxxix (Göteborg 1974) 7.Google Scholar

41 Platon, N., Acts of the International Archaeological Symposium: The Relations Between Cyprus and Crete ca. 2000–500 B.C. (Nicosia 1979). 101–10.Google Scholar

42 Vermeule, E. and Wolsky, F., Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 122 (1978) 294–317Google Scholar and Toumba tou Skourou: The Mound of Darkness (Harvard 1974).

43 Pecorella, P. E.Le Tombe dell'Età del Bronzo Tardo della Necropoli a Mare di Ayia Irini ‘Paleokastro’ (Rome 1977).Google Scholar

44 Catling, op. cit. 4–8 (see n. 33 above), but later in the same article he inclines to the view that the LM IA pottery found at Toumba tou Skourou may reflect the presence there of refugees from Thera, and may have nothing to do with the copper trade.

45 Platon, op. cit. pl. ix. 2, (see n. 41 above).

46 Lagarce, J., Lagarce, E., Bounni, A., and Saliby, N., C. Rend. Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (1983) 249–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 In Buchholz, H. G. and Karageorghis, V., Altägäis and Altkypros (Tübingen 1971) 59.Google Scholar

48 Balmuth, M. S. and Tylecote, R. F., J. Field Archaeology 3 (1976) 195–201Google Scholar; Zwicker, U., Virdis, P., and Ceruti, M. L., in British Museum Occasional Paper 20 (1980) 135–55.Google Scholar

49 Muhly, J. D., Maddin, R., and Wheeler, T. S., Report of the Department of Antiquity (Cyprus 1980) 84–95.Google Scholar

50 Wheeler, , Maddin, , and Muhly, , Expedition 17 (1975) no. 4, 31–9.Google Scholar

51 Muhly, , Wheeler, , and Maddin, , J. Field Archaeology 4 (1977) 353–62.Google Scholar

52 For instance, in Muhly, Wheeler, and Maddin, op. cit. (1977) 355–6, (see n. 51 above), and in Muhly, op. cit. (1979) (see n. 2 above) 94.

53 Muhly, Maddin, and Wheeler, op. cit. (1980) 94 (see n. 49 above).

54 One of the Cape Gelidonya oxhide ingot fragments contained 10 per cent of iron; see Maddin, R. and Muhly, J. D., J. Metals 26 no. 5 (1974) 1–7.Google Scholar The oxhide ingot fragment found in Hattusa has now also proved, from measurements made in Oxford and Erlangen, to contain a large amount of iron.

55 Maddin and Muhly, op. cit. 4 6 (see n. 54 above).

56 Muhly, Wheeler, and Maddin, op. cit. (1977) 359 (see n. 51 above).

57 Muhly, op. cit. (1979) 94 (see n. 2 above).

58 Id., op. cit. (1982) 255 (see n. 2 above).

59 Ibid.

60 For neutron activation analyses of trace elements in ancient copper, see, e.g. Gilmore, G. R., J. Radioanalytical Chemistry 39 (1977) 113–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Gilmore, G. R. and Ottaway, B. S., J. Archaeological Science 7 (1980) 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61 Gale, and Stos-Gale, , Science 216 (1982) 11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar, see also Branigan, K., Nature 296 (1982) 701–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 See, e.g., Brill, R. H. and Wampler, J. M., AJA 71 (1967) 63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gale, , in Thera and the Aegean World i (1978) 529–45.Google Scholar

63 Gale and Stos-Gale, op. cit (1982) (see n. 61 above) and in Report of the Department of Antiquities Cyprus (1985) 83–99.

64 Tin or arsenic minerals, from an ore source different from the copper-ore source used to produce the copper metal, may rarely carry with them sufficient ‘foreign’ lead to disturb the signature of the lead characteristic of the copper-ore deposit, though in practice much ancient arsenical copper was probably an accidental product of the smelting of arsenical copper ores.

65 It was for this very reason, that ‘a single ingot was probably made from the ores of a single mine’, that the Philadelphia group chose to focus their archaeometallurgical studies on oxhide ingots. See Wheeler, Maddin and Muhly, op. cit. 32 (see n. 50 above).

66 Constantinou, G., in Early Metallurgy in Cyprus (Nicosia 1982) 14–7 fig. 2.Google Scholar

67 Commonly the ratios 208Pb/206Pb and 207Pb/206Pb vary less than ±0·3 per cent throughout an ore body; sometimes the variation is much less.

68 A more certain attribution, in the case of overlapping lead isotope ore fields, ideally requires field-work to determine whether the copper deposits were anciently worked, the age of mining, etc.

69 Gale, N. H., Stos-Gale, Z. A., and Zwicker, U., Report of the Department of Antiquity (Cyprus 1986) (in press).Google Scholar

70 Three isotope ratios can be formed from the isotopic abundances of the four naturally occurring isotopes of lead; these ratios can be combined in pairs to give the two diagrams customarily used in plotting graphically the measured lead isotope compositions.

71 The Mathiati Hoard, and the eleven oxhide ingot fragments which form part of it, have been published in Catling, op. cit. 268, pl. 49g (see n. 14 above).

72 Bear, L. M., The Mineral Resources and Mining Industry of Cyprus (Nicosia 1963) 36Google Scholar; Constantinou, , in Early Metallurgy in Cyprus (Nicosia 1982) 20.Google Scholar

73 The analyses are reported by Gale, Stos-Gale, and Zwicker, op. cit. (see n. 69 above).

74 Tylecote, R. F., Ghaznavi, H. A., and Boydell, P. J., J. Archaeological Science 4 (1977) 305–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

75 Paribeni, R., Rend. Linc. 12 (1903) 334–5Google Scholar; Carratelli, P., MA 40, 434, 455–8Google Scholar; Halbherr, F., Stefani, E., and Banti, L., Ann. 55 (1977) 123–4.Google Scholar

76 Full analyses of all sixteen ingots, including metallographic and electron microprobe analyses, are in progress and will be reported in due course.

77 See de Jesus, P., BAR International Series 74 (i) (1980) 21–2, 55, 109, 121, 147, 148Google Scholar; for the geology, see Griffitts, W. R., Albers, J. P., and Oner, O., Economic Geology 115 (1972) 701–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

78 Cumming, G. L. and Richards, J. R., Earth and Planetary Science Letters xxviii (1975) 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

79 Op. cit. (see n. 77 above).

80 Desmet, A., Lapierre, H., Rocci, G., Cagny, C., Parrot, J. F., and Delaloye, M., Nature 273 (1978) 527–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

81 The ingot with a patch bearing a sign, Ingot 726B according to Buchholz, op. cit. (1959) (see n. 1 above), who illustrates it on p. 33 pl. 4.3.

82 See Creutzberg, N., Geological Map of Crete, IGME (Athens 1977).Google Scholar

83 Op. cit. (see n. 39 above).

84 Branigan, , BSA 70 (1975) 18Google Scholar; BSA 72 (1977) 66; Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 13 (1971) 10–14; Aegean Metallurgy in the Early and Middle Bronze Age (Oxford 1974).

85 Op. cit. (see n. 50 above) 32.

86 Op. cit. (see nn. 49, 50 above).

87 Gale, N. H., Stos-Gale, Z. A., and Gilmore, G. R., Anatolian Studies (1985) 143–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Pernicka, E., Seeliger, T. C., Wagner, G. A., Begemann, F., Schmitt-Strecker, S., Eibner, C., Oztunali, O., and Baranyi, I., Jb DR-GZ (1984) 533–99.Google Scholar

88 See Gale, Stos-Gale, and Gilmore, op. cit. (n. 87 above).

89 Bass, op. cit. (see n. 1 above).

90 Catling, op. cit. (see n. 33 above).

91 Branigan, , in Early Metallurgy in Cyprus (Nicosia 1982) 203–12.Google Scholar